Design a fractal innovation model with a sustainable approach in a chaotic environment
Subject Areas : Organizational and managerial creativity-logy, creativity and innovation managementAmir Mehrbanpajooh 1 , Ghanbar Abbaspour 2 , Asghar Moshabaki Esfahani 3 , Gholamreza Hashemzadeh Khorasgani 4
1 - Department of Industrial Management Faculty of Management South
2 - Associate Professor, Department of Industrial Management Faculty of Management South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 - Professor, Department of Business Management Faculty of Management South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
4 - Associate Professor, Department of Industrial Management Faculty of Management South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Keywords: Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix (RIAM), sustainable innovation, Fractal Innovation Model, Four level focal model,
Abstract :
Today,sustainable innovation has become-one-of the requirements of-the-world,so that most managers and production-activists-who are concerned about the environment,use this type of innovation in order to be sustainable in a turbulent and turbulent economic environment,as well as to adapt to it.Due to its unique characteristics,fractal innovation is closely related to the concepts of sustainability(social and ecological) because this view of innovation seeks to minimize resources(raw materials,production resources,energy, water,waste-and-financial resources).The purpose of this study is to provide a model that can be used to consider the dynamics of innovation and business sustainability factors.Also,the present study is quantitative and-exploratory.In this-study,the-components of the fractal innovation model of sustainability were classified using Heidegger method and their originality was measured using the Iranian matrix method.In addition,in order to prioritize the components over the indicators,-the rapid impact assessment matrix method was used, then the four-level focal model was used to present the model.The statistical population of this research is science and technology parks active in the field of innovation in Iran,ten of which were selected as a sample(expert)and with the help of interviews and distribution of questionnaires,the data obtained with the help of Excel software were analyzed.As a result,30components of the fractal sustainable innovation were founded,the most important components included components of circular economy,large scale change,external capability,resource efficiency,stakeholder co-creation,competitive evaluation,economical innovation is the most important and prioritized.
آذر، عادل؛ رجبزاده، علی. (1393). تصمیمگیریکاربردی رویکرد MADM.تهران: انتشارات نگاهدانش، چاپششم.
جعفری، سیدمحمدباقر؛ عبدا...زاده، زهرا.(1398). بررسی تاثیر به کارگیری مکانیکهای بازیپردازی بر موفقیت طرحهای جمعسپاری در حکمرانی الکترونیکی، مورد مطالعه مشارکت شهروندان شهرکرد در زیباسازی شهر. فصلنامه تحقیقات فرهنگی ایران، 131-154.
حبیبی، آرش؛ ایزدیار، صدیقه؛ سرافراز، اعظم.(1393). تصمیمگیری چندمعیارهفازی. تهران: انتشارات کتیبه گیل.
خالدی،آرمان؛ الهی، شعبان؛ مجیدپور، مهدی؛ و اسدیفر، رضا.(1399).عوامل ضروری برای موفقیت همکاری فناورانه نامتقارن بین شرکتهای بزرگ و کوچک در بخش نانوفناوری ایران. فصلنامه علمی مدیریتنوآوری. (1)9، 168-139.
خلیفی، عطا؛ و ایمانی، فیروزه.(1398). گزارش تحلیل فضای کسبوکار ایران(الکام استارز98)، نصر(سازمان نظام صنفی رایانهای کشور).
ستاری،سورنا.(1397). استارتآپها؛ ایبنا، 27 فروردین1397.
سلطانی، مرتضی؛ شفیعی رودپشتی، میثم؛ حسینی، سید جاوید.(1397).شناسایی و اولویتبندی عوامل کلیدی موفقیت پروژههای طراحی محصول با رویکرد جمعسپاری در صنعت فناوریاطلاعات. مدیریتنوآوری، (3)7، 84-51.
عباسپور اسفدن، قنبر.(1393). کاربرد تئوری در مدیریت و مهندسی( کلاسیک و فازی) با رویکرد پایاننامهنویسی.تهران: انتشارات اساتیدبرتر، چاپ پنجم.
عزیزی، شهریار.(1397). روش پژوهش در مدیریت با تاکید بر مثالهای کاربردی و آماری، چاپ دوم. تهران: انتشارات سمت.
قاسمی، وحید.(1384). ضریبآلفایکرونباخ و ویژگیهای آن با تاکید بر کاربرد در پژوهشهایاجتماعی. مجله پژوهشی دانشگاه اصفهان(علومانسانی)، 19(2)، 174-155.
قاضینوری، سروش؛ مختارزاده، نیما؛ ایوبی، محمد؛ و رشیدیآستانه، متین؛ 1399. ظهور قابلیتهاینوپا در یک شرکت کوچک و متوسط دانشبنیان حوزه فینتک. فصلنامه علمی مدیریتنوآوری. (1)9، صفحات 101-138.
قبادیان، وحید(1397). مبانی و مفاهیم در معماری معاصر غرب. تهران: دفتر پژوهشهای فرهنگی. چاپ بیست و ششم.
کرمی، جهانگیر؛ رسولی نژاد، احسان.(1398).مطالعه تطبیقی سیاستهای کلی اقتصادی ن.ج.ا.ا با سیاستهای بلند مدت اقتصادی فدراسیون روسیه. فصلنامه سیاستهای راهبردی کلان. 7(2)، 223-209.
محمدی، محمود؛ فتحی، کیامرث؛ ممتاز، حسین.(1399). تکنیکهای نوین تصمیمگیری چندشاخصه. تهران: انتشارات ادیبان روز، چاپ دوم.
محمدی، مهدی؛ یزدانی، حمیدرضا؛ اجاقی، حامد.(1398). شناسایی بازیگران اصلی ونقشهای کلیدی در زیستبوم نوآوری نوپاها:مطالعهای در استان همدان. فصلنامه علمی مدیریتنوآوری. (1)8، 56-21.
مشبکی، اصغر؛ ممتاز، حسین.(1398). مفاهیم نوین سازمان و مدیریت. تهران: انتشارات ادیبان، چاپ دوم، 83-103.
ممتاز، حسین؛ فتحیهفشجانی، کیامرث؛ و احمدیشریف، محمود.(1399). راهنمای تصمیمگیری چندشاخصه برای کسبوکارها. تهران: انتشارات شرکت چاپ و نشر، چاپ اول. 135-160.
ممتاز، حسین؛ هاشمزاده خوراسگانی، غلامرضا.(1398). جمعسپاری. انتشارات شرکت چاپ و نشر، چاپ اول، 56-31.
Aka, K.G., (2019). Actor-network theory to understand, track and succeed in a sustainable innovation development process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 225, pp.524-540.
Albert, M., (2019). Sustainable Frugal Innovation-The connection between frugal innovation and sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, p.117747
Arnold, M.G., Hockerts, K., (2011). The greening Dutchman: Philips' process of green flagging to drive sustainable innovations. Bus. Strategy Environ. 20 (6), 394-407.
Barbieri, J.C., Vasconcelos, I.F.G.D., Andreassi, T., Vasconcelos, F.C.D., (2010). Innovation and sustainability: new models and propositions. Rev. Adm. Empres. 50 (2), 146-154.
Bilsen, V., et al., (2015). Review of the Eco-Innovation Action Plan (EcoAP). Prepared for the European Commission. DG Environment, Brussels.
Boons, F., Lüdeke-Freund, F., (2013). Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. J. Clean. Prod. 45, 9-19.
Boons, F.A.A., (2013). Organizing within dynamic ecosystems conceptualizing socioecological mechanisms. Organ. Environ. 26 (3), 281-297.
Bossle, M.B., de Barcellos, M.D., Vieira, L.M., Sauv_ee, L., (2016). The drivers for adoption of eco-innovation. J. Clean. Prod. 113, 861-872.
Boswell, C. and Cannon, S., (2012). Overview of evidence-based practice. Evidence-based teaching in nursing: A foundation for educators, pp.1-28.
Bouncken, R.B., Fredrich, V., Kraus, S. and Ritala, P., (2020). Innovation alliances: balancing value creation dynamics, competitive intensity and market overlap. Journal of Business Research, 112, pp.240-247.
Calabrese, A., Costa, R., Levialdi, N., Menichini, T., (2019). Integrating sustainability into strategic decision-making: a fuzzy AHP method for the selection of relevant sustainability issues. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 139, 155-168.
Caraiani, P., (2012). Stylized facts of business cycles in a transition economy in time and frequency. Economic Modelling, 29(6), pp.2163-2173.
Carrillo-Hermosilla, J., Río, P., Konnola, T., (2010). Diversity of eco-innovations: reflections from selected case studies. J. Clean. Prod. 18, 1073-1083.
Christensen, C.M., (2019). O dilema da inovação: quando as novas tecnologias levam empresas ao fracasso. M. Books Editora.
De Loura, I.C. and Dickinson, R., (2016). Fractal Sustainability: A systems approach to organizational change. Taylor & Francis.
De Medici, S., Riganti, P., Viola, S., (2018). Circular economy and the role of universities in urban regeneration: the case of ortigia, syracuse. Sustainability 10, 4305.
Edwards-Schachter, M. and Wallace, M.L., (2017). ‘Shaken, but not stirred’: Sixty years of defining social innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119, pp.64-79.
Gault, F. (2018). Defining and measuring innovation in all sectors of the economy. Research Policy, 47(3), 617e622.
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N.M.P., Hultink, E.J., (2017). The Circular Economy a new sustainability paradigm? J. Clean. Prod. 143, 757-768.
Ghisetti, C., Marzucchi, A., Montresor, S., (2015). The open eco-innovation mode. An empirical investigation of eleven European countries. Res. Policy 44 (5), 1080-1093.
Guthey, G.T., Whiteman, G., Elmes, M., (2014). Place and sense of place: implications for organizational studies of sustainability. J. Manag. Inq. 23 (3), 254-265.
Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L., Figge, F., (2015). Tensions in corporate sustainability: towards an integrative framework. J. Bus. Ethics 127 (2), 297-316.
He, B., Luo, T., Huang, S., (2019). Product sustainability assessment for product life cycle. J. Clean. Prod. 206, 238-250.
Hellstrom, M., Tsvetkova, A., Gustafsson, M. and Wikström, K., (2015). Collaboration mechanisms for business models in distributed energy ecosystems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 102, pp.226-236.
Inigo, E.A. and Albareda, L., (2016). Understanding sustainable innovation as a complex adaptive system: a systemic approach to the firm. Journal of Cleaner Production, 126, pp.1-20.
Karlsson, N.P.E., Hoveskog, M., Halila, F., Mattsson, M., (2018). Early phases of thebusiness model innovation process for sustainability: addressing the status quo of a Swedish biogas-producing farm cooperative. J. Clean. Prod. 172, 2759-2772.
Kuhlmann, S. and Rip, A., (2014). The challenge of addressing Grand Challenges: a think piece on how innovation can be driven towards the" Grand Challenges" as defined under the prospective European Union Framework Programme Horizon 2020.
Langhelle, O., (1999). Towards sustainable development: on the goals of development-and the conditions of sustainability. Springer.
Lazaretti, K., Giotto, O.T., Sehnem, S., Bencke, F.F., (2019). Building sustainability and innovation in organizations. Benchmark Int.
Makhdum, M., )2009(. Four Notes in assessing the developing impact. J Environ Develop, 2(3), pp.9-12.
Mandelbrot, B.B., (1982). The fractal geometry of nature (Vol. 2). New York: WH freeman.
Matviychuk, A., Novoseletskyy, O., Vashchaiev, S., Velykoivanenko, H. and Zubenko, I., (2019). Fractal analysis of the economic sustainability of enterprise. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 65, p. 06005). EDP Sciences.
Mazzucato, M., (2017). Mission-oriented innovation policy. UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose Working Paper.
McDonough, W., Braungart, M. and Kerry, T.H., (2003). The Hannover principles: Design for sustainability. W. McDonough Architects.
Michelino, F., Cammarano, A., Celone, A., Caputo, M., (2019). The linkage between sustainability and innovation performance in IT hardware sector. Sustainability, 11 (16), 4275.
MIT Sloan Management Review, The Boston consulting group, (2011). First look: the second annual sustainability & innovation survey. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 52 (2), 76-84.
Momtaz, H., (2018). Fractal organizations, Second International Conference on Management and Human Sciences. University of Tehran.
Onwuegbuzie, A.J. and Collins, K.M., (2007). A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. Qualitative Report, 12(2), pp.281-316.
Pastakia, C.M. and Jensen, A., (1998). The rapid impact assessment matrix (RIAM) for EIA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 18(5), pp.461-482.
Prahalad, C. K., McCracken, P., & McCracken, R. (2009). The new nature of innovation. Report for OECD. Copenhagen: FORA.
Reficco, E., Roberto Gutierrez, R., Jaen, M.H., Auletta, N., )2018(. Collaboration mechanisms for sustainable innovation. J. Clean. Prod. 203, 1170-1186.
Savaget, P., Geissdoerfer, M., Kharrazi, A., Evans, S., (2019). The theoretical foundations of sociotechnical systems change for sustainability: a systematic literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 206, 878-892.
Slawinski, N., Bansal, P., (2015). Short on time: intertemporal tensions in business sustainability. Organ. Sci. 26 (2), 531-549.
Tamayo-Orbegozo, U., Vicente-Molina, M.-A., Villarreal-Larrinaga, O., (2017). Ecoinnovation strategic model. A multiple-case study from a highly eco-innovative European region. J. Clean. Prod. 142, 1347-1367.
Tiwari, R., Fischer, L., Kalogerakis, K., (2017). Frugal innovation in Germany: a qualitative analysis of potential socio-economic impacts. In: Working Paper, Institute for Technology and Innovation Management, Hamburg University of Technology, No. 96.
Vila, A.I., (2020). International Consumer Protection at the United Nations: Towards Global Governance? Journal of Consumer Policy, 43(1), pp.91-103.
Wohlfart, L., Bünger, M., Lang-Koetz, C., Wagner, F., (2016). Corporate and grassroot frugal innovation: a comparison of top-down and bottom-up strategies. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 6 (4), 5-17.
Xavier, A.F., Naveiro, R.M., Aoussat, A., Reyes, T., (2017). Systematic literature review of eco-innovation models: opportunities and recommendations for future research. J. Clean. Prod. 149, 1278-1302.
_||_
