Identifying the Components and Indicators of Innovation in the Transition from Successful Schools to Sustainable Schools

Subject Areas : Other

Gasem  Shoormig ¹ (PhD Student, Department of Educational Sciences, tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University, tonekabon, Iran.)
Zohreh  Shakibaei ² (Department of Educational Management, tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran)
Fariman  Ebrahimzadeh ³ (Department of Educational Management, shirvan Branch. Islamic Azad University, shirvan, Iran.)

Received: 2022-04-26 Accepted : 2023-01-11 Published : 2022-11-22

Keywords: Successful schools, Sustainable schools, Transition to sustainable schools,

Abstract :

Introduction and Aim: sustainable schools are the product of a set of internal and external parameters in schools, and the quality of schools requires collective effort and coordination of all internal parameters of the school system. Therefore, the aim of the current research is to identify the components and indicators of transition from successful schools to sustainable schools and provide a qualitative model.Method: Delphi method was used in this research. The panel of research experts is a group of 22 experts from the fields of educational management, educational sciences, educational planning, philosophy of education and higher education management, who were selected by the snowball method. First, by using the theoretical foundations, indicators related to sustainable schools were extracted, and in the form of a preliminary questionnaire, it was simultaneously provided to the members of the expert panel for evaluation, and in three rounds of distribution and data collection, data entry and analysis were done. Descriptive statistics technique was used for analysis and W. Kendall's rank test was used to calculate the agreement coefficient of experts.Rindings: 132 indicators and 13 components with an acceptable mean and standard deviation were identified for the transition from successful schools to sustainable schools, which according to the results of the DeBilow Kendall test was 0.709 with a significance level of error less than 0.01 and with 99% certainty; it is the consensus of experts.Conclusion: According to experts, the organization and management component is the most important in a transition model from successful schools to sustainable schools. The characteristics of teachers of sustainable schools and the characteristics of managers are in the next ranks. The components of educational principles and methods, government and governance, educational content, methods of sustainable schools, human relations and participation, characteristics of students of sustainable schools, architecture and building and equipment, culture and society and family respectively in the next degree of importance for the transition of successful schools to Schools are permanent.

References:

حاجی بابایی، حمیدرضا. (1391). ویژگی‌های «مدرسه‌ای که دوست دارم» با توجه به سند تحول بنیادین در آموزش و پرورش. نوآوری‌های آموزشی، 11(2)، 74-51.

حبیبی، حمدالله؛ پرداختچی، محمدحسن؛ ابوالقاسمی؛ محمود و قهرمانی؛ محمد. (1392)، بررسی جو یادگیری محور مدرسه و ارتباط آن با اثربخشی مدرسه. پژوهش‌های آموزش و یادگیری، دانشگاه شاهد، 20 (3) 101-118.

حسنی،, محمد؛ سامری, مریم. (1389). بررسی اثربخشی سازمانی مدارس متوسطه ناحیه یک شهر ارومیه با استفاده از مدل پارسونز. مدیریت فرهنگ‌سازمانی. 8 (21)، 233-201.

حیدری فرد، رضا، رضا زین‌آبادی، حسن، بهرنگی، محمدرضا، عبدالهی، بیژن. (1394). طراحی، آزمون و پیشنهاد الگوی مدرسه نوآور: یک پژوهش آمیخته. رساله دکتری. دانشگاه خوارزمی. تهران. ایران.

خسروجردی؛ نرجس و محمودی؛ مسعود. (1393). مدرسه، خانه‌ای امن برای زندگی کردن وزندگی آموختن. نهمین سمپوزیوم پیشرفت‌های فنّاوری، مشهد، 29 آبان، کمسیون اول: همایش ملی معماری، شهرسازی و توسعه پایدار با محوریت خوانش هویت ایرانی.

رستمی هفشجانی، توران؛ فدوی، محبوبه سادات؛ یوسفی، زهرا. (1399). بازنمایی تجارب موفقیت و ناکامی مدیران مدارس. مدیریت مدرسه. 8 (4)، 91-73.

سبزیان پور، زهره؛ اسلام پناه، مریم. (1399). شناسایی نشانگرهای محوری مدیران آموزشی در فرایند یاددهی- یادگیری. تحقیقات مدیریت آموزشی. 11 (44) و 155-176.

عالی زاده، عبدالرضا. (1385). اجرای تحقیق به روش دلفی. تهران: یوسف.

حاجی پور،زهرا  (1398). تأثیر جوّ سازمانی حاکم بر مدرسه بر میزان فعالیت‌های نوآورانه معلمان مدارس ابتدایی شهر اهواز. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد علوم تربیتی گرایش آموزش ابتدایی، مؤسسه آموزش عالی باختر ایلام.

حسینی، افضل السادات (1398). ماهیت خلاقیت و شیوه‌های پرورش آن. تهران: انتشارات آستان قدس رضوی.

حیدری فرد، رضا؛ زین آبادی، حسن رضا و قوره جیلی، ثریا (1394). تربیت معلمان نوآور لازمه ایجاد و توسعه مدارس کارآفرین؛ پژوهشی کیفی. نخستین کنفرانس ملی مدارس کارآفرین، اصفهان.

مشایخی، زهره؛ نادی، محمدعلی؛ کریمی، فریبا. (1399). ارائه الگوی رهبری مدارس موفق در دوره ابتدایی مبتنی بر نظریه زمینه‌ای. دوماهنامه علمی - پژوهشی رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی، 11 (44)، 210-181.

مهدیون، روح اله؛ پاهنگ، نظام الدین؛ یاریقلی، بهبود. (1396). شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر کیفیت مدارس و بررسی وضعیت موجود آن: پژوهش ترکیبی. مدیریت مدرسه، 5 (1)، 193-173.

موسوی سیرجانی، سهیلا؛ منصوری، مهدیه؛ (1395). سنایی و اخلاق حرفه‌ای نشریه ادبیات عرفانی و اسطوره‌شناختی 12(42).

نوربخش، پریوش و راشدی، مهری. (1393). رابطة علی بین منبع کنترل و اخلاق سازمانی با رضایت شغلی: ارائه مدلی برای محیط کار، نشریه مدیریت ورزشی. 6(3)، 544-531.

Balcı, A. (2008). de Eğitim Yönetiminin Bilimleşme Düzeyi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 54 (54), 181-209. Retrieved from:

   https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/kuey/issue/10343/126706

Benis, B. C. (2004). Research Methods: A Tool for Life. Boston, MA, USA: Pearson.

Brighouse, T. and Tomlinson, J. (1991). Successful schools. London: Institute of Public Policy Research.

Burris, C. & Cimarusti, D. (2021). Chartered for Profit: The Hidden World of Charter Schools Operated for Financial Gain. Network for Public Education.

Burris, C., & Cimarusti, D. (2021). Chartered for Profit: The Hidden World of Charter Schools Operated for Financial Gain. Network for Public Education.

Chua, P. M. H., Hung, D., & Toh, Y. (2020). Successful principalship of a high performing secondary school undergoing curriculum transition. Office of Education Research, National Institute of Education, Singapore.154-142.

Cohodes, S. R., Setren, E. M., & Walters, C. R. (2021). Can successful schools replicate? Scaling up Boston's charter school sector. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 13 (1), 138-67.

Coleman, J. et al. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.

Fedorchuk, Yu (2019). Proessional Standard of a School Principal: Russian and International Experience. Available online at http://creative commons.org/licenses.

Gordon, P. Stephen. (2022). Title Developing Successful Schools: A Holistic Approach. New York: Palgrave Macmillan Cham.

Gurr, D., Drysdale, L., & Goode, H. (2022). An open systems model of successful school leadership. Journal of Educational Administration.

Hasson F., S.K., McKenna H. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique; Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol.32, No.4.

Hasson F., S.K., McKenna H.; Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique; Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol.32, No.4, 2000.

Hower, M. (2019). Examining the Process of School Facilities Planning: A Closer Look at the Educational Predesign and Design (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh).‏

Jarl, M., Andersson, K., & Blossing, U. (2021). Organizational characteristics of successful and failing schools: a theoretical framework for explaining variation in student achievement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1-17.

Klein, E. D., Young, M. D., & Böse, S. (2021). Successful Leadership in Schools Serving Disadvantaged1 Communities in Germany and the USA. International Perspectives on School Settings, Education Policy and Digital Strategies, 47.

Lezotte, Lawrence W. (1991) "School Improvement Based on Effective Schools Research: The Decade Ahead," Educational Considerations: Vol. 18: No.

Linston H.A., Turoff M. (1975). Introduction to the Delphi method: Techniques and Applications; Edited: Harold A. Linston and Murray Turoff, London: Addison-Wesley.

Linston H.A., Turoff M.;(1975). Introduction to the Delphi method: Techniques and Applications; Edited: Harold A. Linston and Murray Turoff, London: Addison-Wesley, 1975.

Myende, P. E., Blose, S., & Adebiyi, D. O. (2021). Leading teaching and learning in a deprived Nigerian context: leadership practices of successful school principals. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1-19.

Neutzling, Misti; Pratt, Erica; Parker, Melissa. (2019). Perceptions of Learning to Teach in a Constructivist Environment. The Physical Educator. Vol. 76 No. 3 (2019).

       DOI: https://doi.org/10.18666/TPE-2019-V76-I3-8757.

Nguyen, N. G., & Pham, H. T. (2020). Constructivist Learning and the Law of Sines in Advanced 10th Grade Geometry Textbooks in Vietnam. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19 (1).

Peña-López, I. (2020). PISA 2018 Results. Effective Policies, Successful Schools.

Powell, C. (2003). The Delphi technique: myths and realities. Journal of Advanced Nursing. Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages 376–382.

Saraçoğlu, G. (2020). primary school teachers’opinions about educational environment in terms of constructivist approach. European Journal of Education Studies.

Sharkey, M., & Gash, H. (2020). Teachers’ Constructivist and Ethical Beliefs. Behavioral Sciences, 10 (6), 96. ‏