Subject Areas : Research On Surface Engineering and Nanomaterials Science

لیلا ابراهیمی قوام آبادی ¹ , پروین فرشچی ² , سید خطیب الاسلام صدرنژاد ³ , ناصر محرم نژاد ⁴ , محمود محمودی ⁵

1 - گروه محیط زیست، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابغ طبیعی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اهواز، ایران
2 - گروه محیط زیست ، واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران ،ایران.
3 - گروه مهندسی مواد ، دانشکده شیمی و مهندسی مواد، دانشگاه صنعتی شریف، تهران، ایران
4 - گروه محیط زیست ، واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران ،ایران.
5 - گروه آمار زیستی، دانشکده بهداشت، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران،تهران، ایران

Received: 2023-01-10 Accepted : 2023-02-20 Published : 2023-03-13

Keywords:

References:

1. US EPA, Nanotechnology White Paper. Science Policy Council, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C., EPA100/B-07/001 (2007).


2. C. Roco, C.A. Mirkin, M.C. Hersam. "Nanotechnology research directions for societal needs in 2020." Retrospective and Outlook. National Science Foundation (Sponsor) (2010).


3. Orru, H .Olstrup, A. Hagenbjörk, S. Nordin ,K. Orru. "Exposures, Symptoms and Risk Perception among Office Workers in Relation to Nanoparticles in the Work Environment." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health , 10 (2022) 5789.


4. Murphy, A. Alavi, M. Mullins, I. Furxhi, A. Kia, M. Kingston. "The risk perception of nanotechnology: evidence from twitter." RSC advances , 18 (2022) 11021-11031.


5. Oberdörster, V. Stone, K. Donaldson. "Toxicology of nanoparticles: a historical perspective." Nanotoxicology , 1 (2007) 2-25.


6. A. Kamarulzaman, K.E. Lee, K.S. Siow, M. Mokhtar . "Public benefit and risk perceptions of nanotechnology development: Psychological and sociological aspects." Technology in Society, 62 (2020) 101329.


7. Royal Society (Great Britain). Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties: Summary and Recomendations. Royal Society, 2004.


8. Miller, L .Archer, E. Pica, D.Bell, R .Senyen, G. Kimbrell. "Nanomaterials, sunscreens and cosmetics: small ingredients, big risks: Friends of the Earth Australia & Friends of the Earth United States." (2006).


9. Larsson, M. Jansson, Å. Boholm. "Expert stakeholders’ perception of nanotechnology: risk, benefit, knowledge, and regulation." Journal of Nanoparticle Research , 21 (2019) 1-17.


10. EPA, US. EPA Air Quality Criteria for Particulate Matter (Final Report, Oct 2004). US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. EPA 600/P-99/002aF-bF, 2004.


11. N .Gupta, H Fischer, L.J .Frewer. "Ethics, risk and benefits associated with different applications of nanotechnology: a comparison of expert and consumer perceptions of drivers of societal acceptance." NanoEthics, 9 (2015) 93-108.


12. Besley, "Current research on public perceptions of nanotechnology." Emerging Health Threats Journal ,1 (2010) 7098.


13. C. Besley, V.L. Kramer, S.H. Priest, "Expert opinion on nanotechnology: risks, benefits, and regulation." Journal of nanoparticle research, 10 (2008) 549-558.


14. D. Cobb, J Macoubrie. "Public perceptions about nanotechnology: Risks, benefits and trust." Journal of Nanoparticle Research ,6 (2004) 395-405


15. Siegrist, C. Keller, H. Kastenholz, S.Frey and A. Wiek. "Laypeople's and experts' perception of nanotechnology hazards." Risk Analysis: An International Journal , 1 (2007) 59-69.


16. Fujita. "Perception of nanotechnology among general public in Japan. Asian Pacific Nanotech Weekly 4, 6." Nanotechnology Research Institute (2006).


17. F. Bol, G.C. Carreira, A. Epp, E. Hafiner, M. Lohmann. "Risk Perception and Risk Communication on the Issue of Nanotechnology." Safety Aspects of Engineered Nanomaterials (2013) 341.


18. P Hart. "Awareness of and attitudes toward nanotechnology and synthetic biology." A Report of Findings. Washington (2008).


19. E. S. Smith, H. D. Hosgood, E. S. Michelson, M. H. Stowe. Stowe. "Americans' nanotechnology risk perception: Assessing opinion change." Journal of Industrial Ecology , 3 (2008) 459-473.


20. J Macoubrie. "Nanotechnology: public concerns, reasoning and trust in government." Public Understanding of Science , 2 (2006) 221-241.