Designing & Ranking of LARGS Paradigms in Competitive Supply Chain Management

Subject Areas : Industrial Management

Alireza Anvari ¹

1 - Department of industrial engineering, Gachsaran branch, I.A.U. Gachsaran, Iran

Received: 2016-05-14 Accepted : 2017-01-17 Published : 2017-01-23

Keywords:

Abstract :

Nowadays, companies review trade samples and process of supply chain inevitably by using improving new techniques because of rapid environmental changes, customer and competitors’ expectations. Management of supply chain tries to apply lean, agile, resilience, green and sustainable in supply chain management in space of management of supply chain by use of the quintuple approach in order to benefit advantages of each of them and cover their deficiencies simultaneously. So, designing of the model of the supply chain by use of the quintuple paradigm approach is sufficient in preparing goods and services. The goal of this research is designing the compositional model of the supply chain by the quintuple paradigm approach in a company of rubber manufacturing of Shiraz - Dena. Method of partial least squares (PLS), FAHP and VIKOR is used for analyzing data. Results of this study showed that the quintuple paradigms have an effective role in the success of the performance of supply chain. So, the assertion of improving the LARG method to LARGS method is very valid. Also, results of this general model show that dimensions of performance have a determining role in getting a competitive advantage. So, findings of this study show that use of the compositional model of the quintuple paradigm of LARGS can have a positive effect on factors of performance for getting a competitive advantage. This developed model can be a model and approach for the so-called company and other similar companies and even it is effective for any other industries too. 

References:

1. Anvari, Alireza, Norzima Zulkifli, & Rosnah Mohd Yusuff. (2013). A dynamic modeling to measure lean performance within lean attributes. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 66(5-8), 663-677.


2. Anvari, Alireza, Norzima Zulkifli, Shahryar Sorooshian, & Omid Boyerhassani. (2014). An integrated design methodology based on the use of group AHP-DEA approach for measuring lean tools efficiency with undesirable output. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 69 (8-9), 1-18.


3. Azevedo, Susana G., Helena Carvalho, & V. Cruz-Machado. (2011). A proposal of LARG supply chain management practices & a performance measurement system. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management & e-Learning, 1(1), 7-14


4. Büyüközkan, Gülçin, & Çiğdem Berkol C. (2011). Designing a sustainable supply chain using an integrated analytic network process & goal programming approach in quality function deployment. Expert Systems with Applications. 38, 13731–13748.


5. Cabral, Izunildo, António Grilo, Rogério P. Leal, & Virgílio C. Machado. (2011). Modelling Lean, Agile, Resilient, & Green Supply Chain Management. Proceedings of the ITI 2011 33rd Int. Conf. on Information Technology Interfaces, June 27-30, Cavtat, Croatia.


6. Cabral, Izunildo, Antonio Grilo, & Virgílio Cruz-Machado. (2012). A decision-making model for Lean, Agile, Resilient & Green supply chain management, International Journal of Production Research, 50(17), 4830-4845.


7. Carter, Craig R., and Dale S. Rogers. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360-387.


8. Carvalho, Helena, & Susana Azevedo. (2014). Trade-offs among lean, agile, resilient & green paradigms in supply chain management: a case study approach. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Management Science & Engineering Management (pp. 953-968). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.


9. Ching, Hong Yuh, & Mayco Anderson Moreira. (2014). Management Systems & Good Practices Related to the Sustainable Supply Chain Management. Journal of Management & Sustainability, 4(2), 34.


10. Govindan, Kannan, Mathiyazhagan Kaliyan, Devika Kannan, & A. N. Haq. (2014). Barriers analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 555-568.


11. Huang, Chia-Ling, Rong-Kwei Li, Chih-Hung Tsai, Yi-Chan Chung, & Chun-Hsien Shih. (2014). A Comparative Study of Pull & Push Production Methods for Supply Chain Resilience. International Journal of Operations & Logistics Management, 3(1), 1-15.


12. Aravind Raj, S., S. Vinodh, W. S. Gaurav, and S. Shiva Sundaram. (2014). Application of hybrid MCDM techniques for prioritising the gaps in an agile manufacturing implementation project. International Journal of Services & Operations Management, 17(4), 421-438.


13. Razmi, Jafar, & Seifoory, Maryam. (2007). Investigation of Structural differences in lean manufacturing & agile supply chain, Journal of Industrial Engineering.


14. Teimoory, Ebrahim., & Alavijeh, Amir. (2008). Proposed a model to analysis the supply chain management structures in industries, the first international conference & the third national conference logistics & supply chain, Tehran.