Comparative Study of Understanding Hermeneutics from the Point of View of Gadamer and Rumi

Subject Areas : Islamic Mysticism

Arezou Boroomandi ¹ , reza fahimi ² , Malekmohamad Farokhzad ³

1 - دانشجوی دکتری زبان و ادبیات فارسی، واحد ساوه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ساوه، ایران.
2 - saveh azad university
3 - استادیار گروه زبان و ادبیات فارسی، واحد ساوه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ساوه، ایران.

Received: 2020-07-25 Accepted : 2020-07-25 Published : 2020-07-22

Keywords:

Abstract :

Georg Gadamer offered a unique and remarkable theory which today is named as Hermeneutics or Text Interpretation. Gadamer has investigated the soul of understanding issue of understanding; In other words, for him, ontology, understanding, and conditions are more understandable than how to understand the text, and that knowledge depends on history, language, and prejudices. In this regard, philosophical hermeneutics is discussed in relation to the principle of the understanding phenomenon, to interpret the rules and methods of understanding, or the bases of understanding and its existential conditions. Therefore, according to this, the Hermeneutics of Rumi should be regarded as a philosophical hermeneutics. According to Molana, understanding and thinking is one of the most important aspects of human differentiation from other beings. Molana’s first exploration of the nature of understanding the subject matter that is supposed to be exchanged between him and the audience, he selects the structure of the story for this. Molana believes human is equivalent to language, precisely the same idea Gadamer suggests in explaining the relationship between thought, understanding and language, that the relationship of thought and language is the relationship between matter and form. This research is descriptive-analytic and based on library data, and seeks to show that Molana, like Gadamer, attaches great importance to the ontology of understanding and its conditions.