Comparison of soil organic carbon estimation using remote sensing and Near Infrared spectrum in forest and agricultural land uses in Gyan area, Hamadan province
Subject Areas : Natural resources and environmental managementSoheilasadat Hashemi 1 , Parinaz Abdoli 2
1 - Assistant prof. Soil Science Department. Malayer University
2 - MSc student, Malayer university
Keywords: remote sensing, Landuse change, Band7, Near-Infrared,
Abstract :
In this study, the relationship between spectral reflections using Landsat 8 satellite sensors and near infrared spectrum with 48 soil samples were investigated in agricultural and forestry uses in Gyan Nahavand, Hamadan province . Soil samples were collected from 0-30 cm depth, randomly. The analysis of the correlation between main bands, artificial bands and soil surface organic carbon, as well as vegetation indices, composition of indicators and soil surface organic carbon were performed. Spectral analysis of soils using field spectrometer with wavelength range of 350-2500 nm was conducted. After recording the spectra, a variety of pre-processing methods were evaluated. The results showed that in the remote sensing method, only the 11 band shows a significant correlation at the level of 5% with organic carbon in agricultural. Also, band composition (band7/ band8) had a significant correlation at the level of 1% with organic carbon content. Three vegetation indices, NDVI, DVI and RAI with organic carbon showed a significant correlation at the level of 5%. The correlation between the calculated organic carbon in the laboratory and the image in agricultural land use was achieved R2 = 0.36. While the correlation of calculated organic carbon in the laboratory and the image was calculated (R2=0.32) at all points. In the spectroscopy method, the highest correlations were observed at wavelengths of 1404, 1907, and 2216, respectively. Among the fitted models given by the multiple regression, stepwise model is proposed for the estimation of organic carbon, a suitable model. Consequently if the number of samples is very low, the laboratory method may be appropriate, but if the number of samples is too high, the spectroscopy method is appropriate to save time, and in order to save costs. Due to the high cost of spectroscopy in Iran, the method of remote sensing is propose as appropriate method.
1. Abbas Nejad B, Khajedin SJ. 2014. Effect of urban reforestation on carbon sequestration in arid soils using remote sensing technology. Journal of RS and GIS for Natural Resources, 5(2): 75-88. (In Persian)
2. Askari MS, Rourke SM, Holden NL. 2015. Evaluation of soil quality for agricultural production using Visible Near Infrared spectroscopy. Geoderma, 243(244): 80-91. http://dx.doi. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.12.012.
3. Babaeean E, Jalali VR. 2016. Estimating soil organic carbon using hyperspectral data in visible, near-infrared and shortwave-infrared (VIS-NIR-SWIR) range. Journal of Soil Management and Sustainable Production, 6(2): 65-82. https://doi.10.22069/ejsms.2016.3143. (In Persian)
4. Banaei MH. 1998. Soil moisture and temperature regimes map of Iran. Soil and Water Research institute of Iran. (In Persian)
5. Bangelesa F, Adam E, Knight J, Dhau I, Ramudzuli Mand Mokotjomela TM. 2020. Predicting soil organic carbon content using hyperspectral remote sensing in a degraded mountain landscape in Lesotho. Applied and Environmental Soil Science, 2158573. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2158573.
6. Ben-Dor E, Banin A. 1995. Near infrared analysis as a rapid method to simultaneously evaluate several soil properties. Soil Science Society American Journal, 59: 364-372. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2158573.
7. Cozzolino D, Moron A. 2003. The potential of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy to analyze soil chemical and physical characteristics. Journal Agricultural Science, 140: 65-71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859602002836.
8. Esbensen, KH. 2006. Multivariate Data Analysis. CAMO Software AS. 589 Pp.
9. Fatemi SB, Rezaei Y. 2013. Introduction to remote sensing. Buali Sina University press, Hamadan.
10. Hassani A, Bahrami HA, Noroozi AA, Ostan Sh. 2014. Visible-near infrared reflectance spectroscopy for assessment of soil properties in gypseous and calcareous soils. Watershed Engineering and Management, 6(2): 140-154. https://doi.10.22092/ijwmse.2014.101721.
11. Henderson TL, Baumgardner MF, Franzmeier DP, Stott DE, Coster DC. 1992. High dimensional reflectance analysis of soil organic matter. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 56(3): 865-872.
12. Hunt GR. 1980. Spectroscopy properties of rock and minerals. In: C.R. Stewart (ed), Handbook of Physical Properties of Rocks. CRC Press Inc, Florida, 259 pages.
13. Khayamim F, Wetterlind J, Khademi H, Stenberg B. 2015. Using visible and near infrared spectroscopy to estimate carbonates and gypsum in soils in arid and sub humid regions of Isfahan, Iran. Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy, 23: 155-165. https://doi.org/10.1255/jnirs.1157.
14. Kuang B, Mouazen AM. 2012. Influence of the number of samples on prediction error of visible and near infrared spectroscopy of selected soil properties at the farm scale. Journal Soil Science, 63(3): 421-429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2012.01456.x.
15. Kunkel VR, Wells T, Hancock GR. 2022. Modelling soil organic carbon using vegetation indices across large catchments in eastern Australia. Science of The Total Environment, 817, 152690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152690
16. Miloš M, Bensab A. 2017. Prediction of soil organic carbon using VIS-NIR spectroscopy: Application to Red Mediterranean soils from Croatia. Eurasian Journal Soil Science, 6 (4): 365-373. https://doi. 10.18393/ejss.319208.
17. Mulders MA. 1987. Remote sensing in soil science. Wageningen: Elsevier.
18. Poormohamadi S, Ekhtesasi MR, Rahimian, MH. 2015. The reorganization and separation of calcite colluvium from non-calcite structure by using remote sensing and lithological characteristics combination (case study: Bhadoran area in Yazad province). Geology Engineering journal, 4: 33-45. https://doi.10.18869/acadpub.jeg.9.4.3113.
19. Rahmani N, Shahedi K, Miryaghobzadeh MH. 2011. Evaluation of vegetation indices using in remote sensing (case study: Herysk catchment). 24 th geomatics congress. Soil Survey institute. Tehran.
20. Ray SS, Singh JP, Dasa G, Panigrahy S. 2004. Use of high resolution remote sensing data for generating site specific soil management plan. Proceedings of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing congress, Istanbul, Turkey.
21. Saati Zarei S, Attaeian B. 2021. Investigation of firing effect in rangelands on soil organic carbon changes using remotely sensed based indices. Journal of RS and GIS for Natural Resources, 12(3): 82-100. http://dorl.net/dor / 20.1001.1.26767082.1400.12.1.1.2. (In Persian)
22. Stenberg B, Rossel RAV, Mouazen AN, Wetterlind G. 2010. Visible and near infrared spectroscopy in soil science. Advance in Agronomy, 107: 163-215.
23. Tsakiridis NL, Keramaris KD, Theocharis JB, Zalidis GC. 2020. Simultaneous prediction of soil properties from VNIR-SWIR spectra using a localized multi-channel 1-D convolutional neural network. Geoderma, 114208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
24. Walkley AJ, Black IA. 1934. An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37: 29-38.
25. Wang X, Zhangb Y, Atkinsonc MP, Yao H. 2020. Predicting soil organic carbon content in Spain by combining Landsat TM and ALOS PALSAR images. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinformation, 92: 102182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.
26. Wetterlind J, Stenberg B, Raphael A, Rossel V. 2013. Soil analysis using visible and near infrared spectroscopy. Plant Mineral Nutrients, 953: 95-107. doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-152-3-6.
27. Xu L, Hong Y, Wei Y, Guo L, Shi T, Liu Y, Jiang Q, Fei S, Liu Y, Mouazen AM, Chen Y. 2020. Estimation of organic carbon in anthropogenic soil by VIS-NIR spectroscopy: Effect of variable selection. Remote Sensing, 12, 3394. doi:10.3390/rs12203394.
28. Žížala D, Minarˇík R, Zádorová T. 2019. Soil organic carbon mapping using multispectral remote sensing data: prediction ability of data with different spatial and spectral resolutions. Remote Sensing, 11, 2947; doi:10.3390/rs11242947.