A Study of the Effect of Communicative Methods and Auditor Professional Expertise on Employers' Response to Auditing Questions
Subject Areas : Ethics and accounting
Mehrdad Panahi Dorcheh
1
,
Mahdi Nazemi Ardakani
2
,
Mahnaz Norouzi AslBalkanlou
3
1 - Ph.D., Student, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Management, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
2 - Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
3 - Ph.D., Student, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Management, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
Keywords: Employer, Professional Expertise, Auditing Questions, Communicative Methods, Auditor,
Abstract :
Purpose: The purpose of the present research is to study the effect of communicative methods and auditor professional expertise on employers' response to auditing questions. Method: The research statistical population consisted of all official auditors in the Iranian association of certified public accountants by the end of the first 6 months of 2020. According to the obtained statistics, the total number of participants was 550 and 1057 members respectively. The study sample by Morgan table and through random sampling was determined to be 225 and 285 among whom 205 members answered the questionnaire. The research method was descriptive-survey and its type was practical correlation. For data collection, a questionnaire was used and the hypothesis testing was conducted by Spss24.Findings: The results showed that there is a significantly negative relation between the method of sending audit questions and the partiality level of the employers' response to the auditor's questions. Besides, there's a significantly negative relation between the level of specialty of auditing questions and the partiality level of employers' response.Conclusion: Since the auditing process is related to humans and requires a suitable social relationship, auditors, in addition to specialized skills, should also improve their communicative skills to foster quality of work. Auditors ought to choose some communicative methods leading to their outstanding social presence and consequently less partiality of employers' response.
اشرفی، بختیار؛ حاجیها، زهره؛ تهرانی، رضا (1402). طراحی مدل تورش رفتاری حسابرسان با تاکید بر ویژگیهای فردی و عمومی حسابرس به روش داده‌بنیاد. دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، 12(45)، ص483-498.
ایوانی، فرزاد؛ عبدی، حدیث؛ خیراللهی، فرشید؛ علیمرادی، مهری (1401). بررسی رابطه بین شکاف انتظار حسابرسی و اطمینان سرمایه‌گذاران: بررسی نقش بهبود سطح ارتباطات حسابرسان. مطالعات تجربی حسابداری مالی، 19(73)، ص117-149. https://doi.org/10.22054/qjma.2021.62225.2286
جان‌نثاری، سید امیر (1391). ویژگیهای حسابرس موفق. حسابدار رسمی، پیاپی 32.
حسینی، سید حسین؛ بنی‌مهد، بهمن؛ صفری، زهرا (1399). بررسی تأثیر دیدگاه‌های تردید حرفه‌ای حسابرس بر ارزیابی ریسک تقلب با توجه به اثر مداخله‌کنندگی مهارت ارتباطی و تضعیف اجتماعی. دانش حسابداری،11(2)،
ص71-105. https://doi.org/10.22103/jak.2020.14079.2985
رابینز، استیفن (1386). مبانی رفتار سازمانی. ترجمه علی پارسائیان و سید محمد اعرابی. تهران: دفتر پژوهش‌های فرهنگی.
رضائیان، علی (1387). تجزیه و تحلیل و طراحی سیستم. تهران: سمت.
سالاری جائینی، زهرا (1392). رابطه ساختار سازمانی، سبک رهبری و فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات با نوع ارتباطات سازمانی کارکنان دانشگاه علوم پزشکی هرمزگان. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد. استاد راهنما مسلم صالحی. دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد مرودشت.
شیروانی‌هرندی، کیمیا؛ اسماعیلیان، ساناز (1401). تاثیر قدرت ارتباطات بر مدیریت ارتباط با مشتری با میانجی‌گری مهارت‌های ارتباطی (مورد مطالعه: شرکت ایران خودرو). پژوهش‌های علوم مدیریت، 11(4)، ص245-262.
صفرزاده، محمدحسین؛ هوشمند کاشانی، عباس (1399). ویژگیهای حسابرس، گرایش‌های حرفه‌ای و تجاری، و تأثیر آنها بر کیفیت حسابرسی. مطالعات تجربی حسابداری مالی، 17(68)، ص145-165.
https://doi.org/10.22054/qjma.2021.50466.2132
گریفین، مورهد (1385). رفتار سازمانی. ترجمه سید مهدی الوانی و غلامرضا معمارزاده. تهران: انتشارات مروارید.
ملکیان، اسفندیار؛ کامیابی، یحیی؛ ابراهیمی مجد، هادی (1401). ارائه مدلی برای ارتقاء کیفیت و مهارت حسابرس از دیدگاه حرفه و کارفرما. پژوهش‌های تجربی حسابداری، 12(3)، ص281-300.
https://doi.org/10.22051/jera.2019.24663.2353
منتی، وحید؛ بابایی، مقداد (۱۳۹۳). ارتباطات در حسابرسی داخلی. در: دومین کنگره سالانه حسابرسی داخلی؛ ارزش‌آفرینی در اقتصاد، نقش‌آفرینی در فرهنگ. تهران: انجمن حسابرسان داخلی ایران.
مهرانی، کاوه؛ یزدانی، سیما؛ بهبهانی‌نیا، پریسا سادات؛ اسکندر، هدی (1392). نحوه انتخاب استراتژی‌های مذاکرات با مدیر توسط حسابرس. پژوهش حسابداری، شماره 8، ص101-122. https://doi.org/10.22051/ijar.2013.425
نصیرزاده، فرزانه؛ خلیفه‌سلطانی، ناهید سادات (1397). شناسایی مهارت‌ها، دانش و نگرش‌های لازم برای حسابرسان امروز. مطالعات اقتصاد، مدیریت مالی و حسابداری، 17(4)، ص42-65.
Anderson, A.W. (2012). The characteristics of a successful auditor. Kansas Society of CPAs.
Bame-Aldred, C.W. & Kida, T. (2007). A comparison of auditor and client initial negotiation positions and tactics. Accounting Organizations and Society, 32, p.497–512.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.07.001
Bazerman, M.H., Curhan, J.R., Moore, D.A. & Valley, K.L. (2000). Negotiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, p.279–314.
Bennett, G.B. & Hatfield, R.C. (2013). The effect of the social mismatch between staff auditors and client management on the collection of audit evidence. The Accounting Review, 88(1), p.31–50. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50286
Berlo, D. (1960). The process of Communication, Michigan State University. New York: Rinehart and Winston.
Biek, M., Wood, W. & Chaiken, S. (1996). Working knowledge, cognitive processing, and attitudes: On the determinants of bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(6), p.547–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296226001
Brauer, M. & Chekroun, P. (2005). The relationship between perceived violation of social norms and social control: Situational factors in fluencing the reaction to deviance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(7), p.1519–1539. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02182.x
Brazel, J.F., Agoglia, C.P. & Hatfield, R.C. (2004). Electronic versus face-to-face review: The effects of alternative forms of review on auditors' performance. The Accounting Review, 79(4), p.949–966. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2004.79.4.949
Brock, T.C. (1967). Communication discrepancy and intent to persuade as determinants of counterargument production. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3(3), p. 296–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(67)90031-5
Daft, R.L. & Lengel, R.H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), p.554–571. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
Dixon, J., Belnap, C., Albrecht, C. & Lee, K. (2010). The importance of soft skills. Corporate Finance Review, 14(6), p.35–38.
Drolet, A.L. & Morris, M.W. (2000). Rapport in conflict resolution: Accounting for how face-to-face contact fosters mutual cooperation in mixed-motive conflicts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(1), p.26–50. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1395
Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. (2004). Social norms and human cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), p.185–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.007
Frohlich, N. & Oppenheimer, J. (1998). Some consequences of e-mail vs. face-to-face communication in experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 35(3), p. 389–403.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(98)00044-4
Gibbins, M., Salterio, S. & Webb, A. (2001). Evidence about Auditor-Client Management Negotiation Concerning Client’s Financial Reporting. Journal of Accounting Research, 39(3), p. 535563. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00027
Ham, C.C., Hann, R.N., Rabier, M. & Wang, W. (2022). Auditor skill demands and audit quality: Evidence from Job Postings.
Available at: SSRN 3727495 https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3727495
Hoffman, V.B. & Patton, J.M. (1997). Accountability, the dilution effect, and conservatism in auditors' fraud judgments. Journal of Accounting Research, 35(2), p. 227–237.
Hussein, A. (2017). Importance of Generic Skills in Accounting Education: Evidence from Egypt. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 7(2), p. 16-35.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ijafr.v7i2.11782
Jackson, D. (2012). Business undergraduates' perceptions of their capabilities in em-ployability skills: Implications for industry and higher education. Industry and HigherEducation, 26(5), p. 345–356. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2012.0117
Keating, J.P. & Brock, T.C. (1974). Acceptance of persuasion and the inhibition of counterargumentation under various distraction tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10(4), p.301–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(74)90027-4
Kleckner, R.A. (1985). The deregulation of public accounting. Accounting Education, p.157-162.
Kruglanski, A.W., Webster, D.M. & Klem, A. (1993). Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), p. 861–876. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.861
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), p. 480–498. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
Lancaster, L.C. & Stillman, D. (2010). The M-factor: How the Millennial Generation is Rocking the Workplace. New York: HarperBusiness.
Lindstedt, K. & Veerman, M. (2018). Auditing auditor identities – Auditor attributes, professional and commercial orientations, and the implications for audit practice. Working Paper, School of Health and Society, Hogskolan Kristiansad, Sweden.
Lynch, A.L., Murthy, U.S. & Engle, T.J. (2009). Fraud brainstorming using computermediated communication: The effects of brainstorming technique and facilitation. The Accounting Review, 84(4), p. 1209–1232. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.4.1209
May, C.A. & May, G.S. (2012). Effective Writing: A Handbook for Accountants (9th ed.). Boston: Prentice Hall.
McCracken, S., Salterio, S.E. & Gibbins, M. (2008). Auditor-client management re lationships and roles in negotiating financial reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4–5),
p.362–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.09.002
Messier, W.F., Glover, S.M. & Prawitt, D.F. (2017). Auditing & Assurance Services: A Systematic Approach (10th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
Nolder, C.J. & Kadous, K. (2018). Grounding the professional skepticism construct in mindset and attitude theory: a way forward. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 67, p.1-14.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.03.010
Norman, S.N. & Abdul Latiff, A.R. & Mohd Said, R. (2018). Employers Perception on Skill Competencies and the Actual Performance of Bachelor of Accounting Graduates in Malaysia. International Academic Journal of Accounting and Financial Management, 5(3), p. 88-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.9756/IAJAFM/V5I2/1810019
Osterhouse, R.A. & Brock, T.C. (1970). Distraction increases yielding to propaganda by inhibiting counterarguing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15(4), p. 344–358.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029598
Saiewitz, A. & Kida, T. (2018). The effects of an auditor's communication mode and professional tone on client responses to audit inquiries. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 65, p.33-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2017.10.002
Short, J., Williams, E. & Christie, B. (1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Short, J.A. (1974). Effects of medium of communication on experimental negotiation. Human Relations, 27(3), p.225–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872677402700303
Siegel, G. (2000). Changing work roles demand new knowledge and skills. Strategic Finance, 81(8), p.65-6.
Sorensen, K. & Ortegren, M. (2021). The next best thing: Social presence and accountability's impact on auditor professional skepticism. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 32(2), p.39-51. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22484
Suh, K.S. (1999). Impact of communication medium on task performance and satisfaction: An examination of media-richness theory. Information & Management, 35(5), p.295–312.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00097-4
Swaab, R.I., Galinsky, A.D., Medvec, V. & Diermeier, D.A. (2012). The communication orientation model: Explaining the diverse effects of sight, sound, and synchronicity on negotiation and group decision-making outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(1), p. 25–53.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311417186
Tetlock, P.E., Skitka, L. & Boettger, R. (1989). Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability: Conformity, complexity, and bolstering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), p. 632–640. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.632
Trompeter, G. & Wright, A. (2010). The world has changed – have analytical procedure practices?. Contemporary Accounting Research, 27(2), p.669 –700.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01021.x
Trotman, K., Wright, A. & Wright, S. (2009). An Examination of the effects of auditor rank on negotiation planning judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(1), p.191–203. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2009.28.1.191
Van Zant, A.B. & Kray, L.J. (2014). I can't lie to your face: Minimal face-to-face interaction promotes honesty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, p.234–238.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.07.014
Westermann, K., Bedard, J.C. & Earley, C.E. (2015). Learning the 'craft' of auditing: A dynamic view of auditors' on-the-job learning. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(3), p.864–896.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12107
Wood, W. (1982). Retrieval of attitude-relevant information from memory: Effects on susceptibility to persuasion and on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(5),
p. 798–810. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.5.798
