Adjective Typology from 4th to 6th Centuries With An Approach To Persian Interpretations
Subject Areas : Persian language and literature texts
Hasssan Dehghanipour
1
(
Ph.D. student, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Letterse and Humanities, , Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch,karaj,Iran
)
Iraj Mehraki
2
(
Associate Professor Department of Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Letterse and Humanities, Islamic Azad University , Karaj Branch,karaj,Iran.
)
Keywords: دستور زبان, Typology, Syntax, تفسیرهای فارسی, گونه شناسی, صفت های گونه ای, ساختمان صفت ها, Persian interpretations, Typical adjectives, Structure of adjectives,
Abstract :
“Adjective” is among the most important dependents of any nominal group. A large of nominal group structure’ features in the past can be learnt by examining different types of adjectives and approaching to Persian interpretations. These features are particularly created by crafted translators of Quranic verses, and so far, none of the historical structures, stylistics, and cultural references have addressed its important parts. The current research is an attempt to study adjective “typology” from 4th to 6th centuries with an approach to Persian interpretations. The question to be answered is whether it is possible to analyze and categorize adjectives from linguistic point of view? Which factors distinguish these attributes from each other? For this purpose, interpretations like Translation of Tafsir al-Tabari, An Interpretation Of The Holy Qur'an, An Interpretation Of Taj-Ul Tarajem Fi Tafsir-E Quran-Ul A’ajem, An Interpretation Of The Last Tenth Of The Holy Quran, An Interpretation Of The Holy Qur'an (Cambridge Version), Part Of The Ancient Interpretation, Part Of The Ancient Interpretation In Persian, A Classical Persian Commentary On The Qur‘An (Tafsīr-I Shunqushī), Nasafi Interpretation, Rawz Al-Jinan Wa Ruh Al-Jinan, and Kashf Al-Asrar Wa Udat Al-Abrar are reviewed to approve that, in these works of art, adjectives can be identified and categorized, typologically.
_||_