The study of the formation and functioning of the “Response to Protect Doctrine” in International Law

Subject Areas : Iranian Political Research

Mohammadreza hakakzadeh ¹ , Arezoo Bozorg doagoo ²

1 - Assistant Professor, Department of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Qom Branch, Qom, Iran.
2 - M.A. Student of International Relations, Islamic Azad University, Qom Branch, Qom, Iran.

Received: 2019-11-08 Accepted : 2019-11-08 Published : 2019-10-23

Keywords: مداخله بشردوستانه, Humanitarian intervention, حقوق بین‌الملل, International law, دکترین مسئولیت حمایت, حقوق بشردوستانه, Response to protect, Humanitarian law,

Abstract :

The growing proliferation of UN-oriented international organizations and their role in shaping human life has led the international community to witness new horizons in international law, one of the most important doctrines presented in The new horizons of international law are the doctrine of the responsibility of support, a doctrine that has become a special place in the development of a universal normality today in the theoretical discussions of international law thinkers, which, given the importance of the subject in this The paper, while addressing the fundamentals and features of the doctrine of responsibility for support Opponents point of view and understand the meaning of it, the doctrine of responsibility to protect the fundamental question of how to operate Square has been achieved? Research findings suggest that although the doctrine has already been cited in crises such as the Darfur crisis, Libya, and even Tsunami Haiti and today in Syria, however, political restrictions are, in fact, the subject of the intervention of great powers and recourse to this doctrine to interfere with the pretext of human rights in other countries and undermine the principle of independence and sovereignty and regional instability.

References:

1. داداندیش، پروین (1391). تحولات لیبی و دکترین مسوولیت حمایت. راهبرد، 21(62): 192-169.

2. رشیدی‌نژاد، زینب (1386). موازین و مرزهای مداخله بشردوستانه در رویه شورای امنیت. حقوقی(معاونت حقوقی و امور مجلس ریاست جمهوری)، 37: 102-63.

3. سرتیپی، حسین (1386). مداخله بشردوستانه از تئوری تا عمل. تهران: پژوهشکده تحقیقات استراتژیک.

4. شایگان، فریده و دیگران (1382). تقویت همکاری‌های بین‌المللی در زمینه حقوق بشر. تهران: دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران.

5. قادری، سیدمحمد؛ قربان‌نیا، ناصر (1392). دکترین مسوولیت حمایت و تلاش برای مقابله با فجایع انسانی. روابط خارجی، 5(17): 234-199.

6. قربان‌نیا، ناصر (1382). مداخله بشردوستانه از منظر اخلاق. نامه مفید،37: 125-152.

7. مولایی، یوسف (1382). استقلال، دموکراسی و حقوق بشر. نامه، 28: 35-43.

8. مهرپور، حسین (1383). نظام بین‌المللی حقوق بشر. تهران: اطلاعات.

9. Chandler, D. (2004). The Responsibility to Protect? Imposing the Liberal Peace, Peacekeeping, 11(1):59-81.

10. Evans, G. (2008). The Responsibility to Protect: Ending Mass Atrocity Crimes Once and for All. Washington D.C: Brooking.

1. Chandler, D. (2004). The Responsibility to Protect? Imposing the Liberal Peace. The Journal of International Peacekeeping, 11(1):59-81. DOI: 10.1080/1353331042000228454

2. Dadandish, P. (2012). Libyan Developments and Doctrine of Responsibility for Support. Rahbord, 21(69): 192-169. [In Persian]

3. Evans, G. (2008). The Responsibility to Protect: Ending Mass Atrocity Crimes Once and for All. Washington D.C: Brooking.

4. Ghaderi, S.M. (2013). Doctrine of Responsibility for Support and Efforts to Counter Human Disasters. Foreign Relations, 5(17): 199-234. [In Persian]

5. Ghorbannia, N. (2003). Humanitarian intervention from the perspective of ethics. Mofid Letters, 37:125-152. [In Persian]

6. Mehrpour, H. (2004). International human rights system. Tehran: Information. [In Persian]

7. Mola'i, Y. (2003). Independence, democracy and human rights. Letter, 28: 35-43. [In Persian]

8. Rashidinejad, Z. (2007). Rules and Borders of Humanitarian Intervention in Security Council Procedure. Legal (Vice President of Legal Affairs and Presidential Affairs), 37:102-63.[In Persian]

9. Sartipi, H. (2007). Humanitarian intervention from theory to practice. Tehran: Institute for Strategic Research. [In Persian]

10. Shayegan, F. & Others (2003). Strengthening international cooperation in the field of human rights. Tehran: Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran. [In Persian]