Comparative Analysis and Quality Assessment of Urban Residential Environment in Navab and Ekbatan Neighborhoods Using HMR and EFA Methods

Subject Areas : environmental management

Mojtaba  Rafieian ¹ (Assist. Prof. Urban Planning, Tarbiat Modares University.)
Zahra  Asgarizade ² (MA of Urban Planning, Tarbiat Modares University)
Farzin  Amin Salehi ³ (MA of Urban Planning, Tarbiat Modares University)

Received: 2009-04-04 Accepted : 2009-06-26 Published : 2014-12-22

Keywords: Urban residential environment , Satisfaction approach, Hierarchical Multiple Regressi, Exploratory Factor Analysis,

Abstract :

Quality of the environment is part of the overall concept of quality of life (QOL). Quality of the environment is considered to be of minor importance as compared to other aspects of QOL including one's health, family life, work, and social network. Nowadays, decline or loss of environmental quality in the urban residential environment is one of the most important crises for urban planners and policy makers. The main goal of the present research is to perfom a comparative study in two residential areas including Navab and Ekbatan neighborhoods. To this end, a questionnaire was used based on satisfaction approach and theoretical model of environmental quality. Data collection was conducted at the study field using a questioner filled in for a sample of 540 residents. Data analysis has been also conducted using the SPSS software and statistical methods such as Hierarchical Multiple Regression (HMR) approach, one sample T test and One Way Anova. Reliability and validity of the questionnaires were tested by Exploratory Factor Analysis and Cronbach's Alpha methods. According to the results, environmental quality in the Navab residential area was lower than 5>98/2>1) Versus(5>23/3>1  the environmental quality in the Ekbatan residential. Results of Hierarchical Multiple Regression show that the environmental hygiene factor in Navab (β=0/657) and the sociability factor in Ekbatan (β=./288) were of top-importance from the residents point of view. The results of Exploratory Factor Analysis show that the experimental model of quality assessment was a good fit for quality evaluation. Results of Cronbach's Alpha in Navab (α=./87) and Ekbatan (α=./86) confirmed the validity of the questionnaire

References:

1. Van Poll, R., (1997). The Perceived Quality of the Urban Residential Environment. A Multi-Attribute Evaluation. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen.


2. RIVM, (2002). In: Bouwman, A., van Kamp, I., van Poll, R. (Eds.), Workshop livability 2002, 18 December 2001.


3. Ott, W. R., (1978). Environmental indices: Theory and practice, Ann Arbor: Ann Arbor Science publishers,.


4. Van Kamp, Irene., Leidelmeijer, Kess., Marsman, Gooitske., de Hollander, Augutinus., (2003). Urban environmental quality and human well-being Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts; a literature study, Journal of Landscape and Urban Planning,Vol 65, 5-18.

 

1. Porteous, J.D., (1971). ”Design with People-the Quality of the Urban  Environment”. Environmental and Behavior. No 3, 155–178.


2. Ge, Jian., Hokao, Kazunori., (2006). Research on residential lifestyles in Japanese cities from the viewpoints of residential preference, residential choice and residential satisfaction, J. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78, 165-178.


3. Lansing, J. B. and R. W. Marans., (1969).” Evaluation of Neighborhood”, J. of the American Institute of Planners, 35: 195-199.


4. Jelinkova, Z., and Picek, M., (1984). “Physical and Psychological Factors Determining Population Responses to Environment”. Active. Nerv. Sup., 26 (2), 144-146.


5. Gruber, J. B., and Shelton, G. G., (1987). “Assessment of Neighborhood Satisfaction by Residents of Three Housing Types”. Social Indicators Research, 19, 303-315.


6. Ha, M., and Weber, M. J., (1994). “Residential Quality and Satisfaction: Toward Developing Residential Quality Indexes”. Home Economics Research Journal, 22 (3), 296-308.


7. C.Galster, George., W.Hesser, Garry., (1981). Residential satisfaction: Compositional and contextual correlates, J. Environment and Behavior, 13(6), 735-758.


8. Galster, George C., (1987). Homeowners and Neighborhood Reinvestment. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.


9. McCray, J.W. and Day, S.S., (1977). Housing Values, Aspirations and Satisfactions as Indicators of Housing Needs, Home Economics, 5 (4), 244-254.


10. Onibokun, A.G., (1974). Evaluating Consumers’ Satisfaction with Housing: An Application of a System Approach, J. American Institute of Planners, 40(3), pp.189-200.


11. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., and Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: perceptions, evaluations and satisfactions. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.


12. Francescato, G., Weidemann, S., and Anderson, J.R. (1987). Residential satisfaction: Itsuses and limitations in housing research, in Housing and Neighborhoods: Theoretical and Empirical Contributions. Vliet, W.V., Choldin, H., Michelson, W., and Popenoe, D.(eds.),Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.


13. Baum, B., and Paulus, P. B. (1987). Crowding. In D. Stokols, and I. Altman (Ed.), Handbook of environmental psychology (vol. 1, pp. 533-570). New York Chicester Brisbane Toronto Singapore: John Wiley and Sons.


14. Lewis, D. A., and Maxfield, M. G. (1980). Fear in the neighborhoods: an investigation of the impact of crime. British Journal of Psychology, July, 160-189.


15. Baba, Y., and Austin, D. M., (1989). “Neighborhood Environmental Satisfaction, Victimization, and Social Participation as Determinants of Perceived Neighborhood Safety”. Environment and Behavior, 21 (6), 763-780.


16. White, M., Kasl, S. V., Zahner, G. E. P., and Will, J. C. (1987). Perceived crime in the neighborhood and mental health of women and children. Environment and Behavior, 19(5), 588-613.


17. Lewis, D. A., and Maxfield, M. G. (1980). Fear in the neighborhoods: an investigation of the impact of crime. British Journal of Psychology, July, 160-189.


18. Bachrach, K. M., and Zautra, A. J. (1985). Coping with a community stressor: the threat of a hazardous waste facility. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 26(june), 127-141.


19. Cook, J. (1983). Citizen response in a neighborhood under threat. American Journal of Community Psychology, 11(4), 459-471.


20. Kaplan R, Austin M E, (2004). ``Out in the country: sprawl and the quest for nature nearby'' Landscape and Urban Planning 69, 235 – 243.


21. Tognoli, J., (1987). Residential environments. In: Stokols, D., Altman, I. (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology, vol. 1. Wiley, New York, pp. 655–690.


22. Lu, M., (1999). Determinants of residential satisfaction: ordered logit vs. regression models, Growth and Change, 30, 264-287.


23. Hogarth, R., (1987). Judgment and choice (2 ed.). pp. 311. Chicester New York Brisbane Toronto: John Wiley and Sons.


24. Freeman III, A.M., (2003). “The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods”, Second ed. Resources for the Future, Washington DC, 23–26.