Hazards identification and risk evaluation through FMEA method in Tehran 8th district girls and boys’ public primary schools

Subject Areas : HSE Management

Mobina  Bakooie Katrini ¹ (MSc of Environment Management (HSE), Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Islamic Azad University, Zahedan., Iran.)
Seyed Alireza Seyed  Haji Mirzahosseini ² (-Assistant professor of environmental engineering , Faculty of the Environment and Energy, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran*(Corresponding author))
Mahnaz  Nasr Abadi ³ (Assistant Professor of Islamic Azad University, Zahedan Branch, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Environmental Management (HSE), Zahedan, Iran.)

Received: 2016-09-05 Accepted : 2016-12-03 Published : 2018-03-21

Keywords: Hazard evaluation, primary schools, boys, girls,

Abstract :

Abstract Background and Objective:Dangers recognition and risk assessment in the schools can be considered as an efficient action to improve students’ health and development especially in elementary schools. Method: Two risks evaluation approaches of FMEA and William Fine have been used in this survey. In addition, risk assessment was furnished based on three factors (effect severity, occurrence probability, and exposure level). After identifying the activities through frequent presence in the study places and interviewing the students and the people in charge, the dangers and potential harmful effects were identified. Finally, considering the effect severity, possible consequences occurrence probability, and the exposure level, the risks evaluation and classification were done. Findings: Regarding summation of health and safety hazards for girls in different levels of H, M, and L had been 4, 15, and 38, respectively. Furthermore, sum of health and safety risks for boys in various levels of H, M, and L had been 5, 16, and 35, respectively. After taking the proposed controlling actions and re-evaluating the hazards, in different phases of H, M, and L for girls was changed to 2, 6, and 50, respectively and this amount was changed to 2, 7, and 47 for boys in various levels of H, M, and L, respectively. The number of risks in the average and unacceptable levels was considerably reduced after performing the controlling actions. Discussion and Conclusion: The identified hazards have been similar for both genders in most of the cases. The hazard intensity has been higher in boys which can be related to higher physical activity, trusting their personal skills, engaging in risky behaviors, and underestimating physical dangers.  

References:

1. Mokdad, M., Al-Ansari, M. 2004. Anthropometric perspective. Ergonomics, Vol. 47(4), pp. 416-426.


2. Khosravi, Sh., Yaghmai, F. 2010. Designing a Student accident report form. Scientific Journal of Forensic Medicine, Vol. 16, No. 2. (In Persian).


3. Sosnowska, S., Kostka, T., 2003. Epidemiology of school accident during a six school-year period in one region in Poland. European Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 18(10), pp. 977-82.


4. Schalamon, J., Eberl, R., Ainoedhofer, H., Singer, G., Spitzer, P., Mayr, J., Schober, P.H., Hoellwarth, M.E., 2007. School accidents in Austria. Pediatric Surgery International, Vol. 23(9), pp. 861-5.


5. Kermani, M., Farzadkia, M.,Yousefi, Z.,Ghandali, R. 2012. Investigating the Environmental Health and Safety Status among Primary Schools in Pakdasht city in the academic year 2010-2011. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Vol. 22, No. 95. (In Persian).


6. Raman, S.R., Boyce, W.F., Pickett, W. 2009. Associations between adolescent risk behaviors and injury: the modifying role of disability. Journal of School Health, Vol. 79(1), pp. 8-16.


7. Wong, D.L. 1999. Whaley and Wong Nursing Care of Infant and Children. 6^th edition, St. Louis, Mosby Company.


8. Brown, D. 2004. Traffic Fatalities, A Growing Thereat Worldwide.


9. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 2014. School-Transportation-Related Crashes, U.S. Department of Transportation, see information in: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/812170.pdf. 4p.


10. Hajian, K.O., Sajadi, P., Rezani, A., 2008. Prevalence of Overweight and Underweight among Primary School children Aged 7-12 Years (Babol; 2006). Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences, Volume 10, Number 3: 83-91. (In Persian).
    
    
    1. Heidarimoghadam, R., Golmohammadi, R., Roshanaei, G., Zare, R. 2015. Assessing the match between female Primary Studentsʼ anthropometric dimensions and furniture dimensions in Hamadan Schools in 2013. Journal of Health and Safety at Work. Vol. 5, No. 1. (In Persian)
    
    


11. Jones, S.E., Shults, R.A. 2009. Trends and subgroup differences in transportation-related injury risk and safety behaviors among US high school students, 1991-2007. Journal of School Health, Vol. 79(4), pp. 169-76.

2. Ramezankhani, A. 1999. General Public Health Book, Chapter 11, Speech 14.(In Persian).

10. Baradaran Rahmanian, N., Zayerzadeh, A., Haji Hashemi, Sh., 2012. Methodology for determining the level of risk and assessing the safety of schoolchildrens traffic on roads, 11^th Transporation and Traffic Engineering Conference of Iran, Tehran. Transportation and Traffic Organization of Tehran, Deputy Director of Transportation and Traffic, Tehran Municipality. (In Persian)

15. Salehpourdehkordi, Z., Yaghmaei, F., Akbarzadeh baghban, A., Hosseinzadeh, S. 2010. The Survey of Hygiene and Safety Physical Environment Status of Primary Schools in Shahrekord City in 2009. The Journal of Toloo-e-behdasht, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp.41-50. (In Persian)

16. Rezaei, K., Seyedi, M., Nouri, B. 2003, Analysis of the malfunction scenarios and its effects by FMEA. (In Persian).