Effect of Light Conditions on Chestnut (Castanea Sativa) Leaf Morphology

Subject Areas : environmental management

Mehrdad Zarafshar ¹ , Moslem Akbarinia ² , Ali Sattarian ³ , Hemed Yousefzade ⁴ , Mehdy Taieby ⁵

1 - - Ph.D, Department of Natural Resources, Tarbiat Modaress University.
2 - Associate Professor, Department of Natural Resources, Tarbiat Modaress University*(Corresponding Author).
3 - Associate Professor, University of Gonbad Kavoss.
4 - -Assistant Professor, Department of Natural Resources, Tarbiat Modaress University
5 - M.Sc, Department of Natural Resources, Gorgan University

Received: 2009-11-19 Accepted : 2010-04-24 Published : 2016-06-21

Keywords: Castanea Sativa, Plasticity, Light Regime, Leaf Morphologic,

Abstract :

Background and Objective: Increasing of degradation process in Chestnut (Castanea Sativa) pure stands as reserved forest in west of Hyrcanian forest led to genetic erosion of the stand. Understanding of ecological demands of plant species is necessary for their management and conservation. So we investigated on leaf morphologic characteristics of chestnut in response to different light regimes.  Method: For this purpose 60 trees of natural stands around of Ebrahim Emamzade (in Shaft city located in Guilan province) were selected. Ten leaves (40 leaves from every tree) randomly were selected from four aspects of trees (north, south, east and west). These leaves were imposed by different light regimes. Some of the parameters such as lamina length, lamina width, distance from leaf base to the leaf maximum width, petiole length, nerves (counted variable), teeth (counted variable), leaf tooth width, leaf tooth length, tooth distance and tooth index were measured and analyzed after calculating the plasticity for each character in four aspects. Findings: The plasticity values showed that there is no significant differences among four aspects of crown. The results indicated that plasticity of all studied characters is so low while the most value of C.V was belonged to leaf limb width (4.04%). Discussion and Conclusion:  The results of ANOVA showed that all studied parameters had no significant differences between surveyed aspects except distance from leaf corner to the most leaf limb width. Our finding confirmed that morphologic characters of Castanea sativa leaf has low flexibility in response to light conditions. We suggest that study of other ecological demands are necessary for presentation of accurate guidelines to forest managers.

References:

1. هدایتی. م.ع، مروی مهاجر. م.ر، جزیره­ای. م.ح و زبیری. م، 1382، بررسی امکان تولید نهال شاه بلوط(Castanea sativa) در استان گیلان، مجله منابع طبیعی ایران.3(56): ص 229-244.


2. Lusk, C., Reich, P.B., Montgomery, R.A., Ackerly, D.D., Cavender-Bares, J., 2008. growth, biomass allocation, and crown morphology of understory sugar maple, yellow birch, and beech. Ecoscience 7, 345–356.


3. Matos, ., Wolfgramm, R., Goncalves F. V., Cavatte P. C., Ventrella, M. C., DaMatta . M., 2009. Phenotypic plasticity in response to light in the coffee tree.  Journal of Environmental and Experimental Botany. 241, 278–287.


4. Valladares, F., Gianoli, E., Gomez, J.M., 2007. Ecological limits to plant phenotypic plasticity. Tansley review. New Phytol. 176, 749–763.


5. Valladares, F., Niinemets, U., 2008. Shade tolerance, a key plant feature of complex nature and consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39, 237–257.


6. Walters, R.G., 2005. Towards an understanding of photosynthetic acclimation. J. Exp. Bot. 56, 435–447.


7. Murchie, E.H., Horton, P., 1997. Acclimation of photosynthesis to irradiance and spectral quality in British plant species: chlorophyll content, photosynthetic capacity and habitat preference. Plant Cell Environ. 20, 438–448.


8. Crick, J.C., Grime, J.P., 1987. Morphological plasticity and mineral nutrient capture in two herbaceous species of contrasted ecology. New Phytologist 107, 403–414.


9. Bradshaw, A.D., Chadwick, M.J., Jowett, D., Snaydon, R.W., 1964. Experimental investigations into the mineral nutrition of several grass species. IV nitrogen level. Journal of Ecology, 665–676.


10. Futuyma, D.J., Moreno, G., 1988. The evolution of ecological specialization. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19, 207–233.


11. Van Tienderen, P.H., 1997. Generalists, specialists, and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity in symmetric populations of distinct species. Evolution 51, 1372–1380.

1. یوسف زاده. ح، اکبریان. م.ر و اکبری نیا. م، 1388، بررسی تنوع برگ درخت انجیلی (Parrotia  persica) در طول شیب ارتفاعی در شرق مازندران، مجله رستنی­ها، 9(2): ص178-189.


2. زرافشار. م، اکبری نیا. م، یوسف زاده. ح و ستاریان. ع، 1388، بررسی تنوع در خصوصیات مورفولوژیک برگ و میوه گونه داغداغان (L.  Celtis australis) در شرایط جغرافیایی مختلف. دوفصل­نامه تحقیقات ژنتیک گیاهان مرتعی و جنگلی.(در دست چاپ)

14. Sultan, S.E., 1995. Phenotypic plasticity and plant adaptation. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 44, 363–383.


15. Sultan, S.E., 2001. Phenotypic plasticity for fitness components in Polygonum species of contrasting ecological breadth. Ecology 82, 328– 343.


16. Curtis, W., 1983. Photosynthetic potential of sun and shade Viola species. Can. J. Bot. 62, 1273–1278.


17. Walters, M.B., Field, C.B., 1987. Photosynthetic light acclimation in two rainforest Piper species with different ecological amplitudes. Oecologia. 72, 449–456.


18. O´Neill, G. A; Aitken, S.N; Thomas-Adams, W.O.2000. Genetics selection for cold hardiness in coastal Douglas- Fir seedlings and saplings. Can.j.for.Res; 30:1799-1807.


19. Sierra- Lucero, V; Mc keand, S.E; Huber, D. A; Rockwood, D. L; White, L. 2002. Performance differences and genetic parameters for coastal provenance of Loblloly pine in southeastern United States. For.Sci; 48: 732-742


20. Cornelius.J, L. Apedaile & F. Mesen. 1995. Provenance and Family Variation in Height and Diameter Why are evergreen leaves so contrary about shade? Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 299–303.


21. Aravanopulos, A., 2005. Phenotypic variation and population relationships of chestnut (Castanea sativa) in Greece, revealed by multivariate analysis of leaf morphometrics. Acta Horticulturae 693: 230–240. Sci. For. 50. 25s–34s.


22. Bruschi, P., Grossoni, P and Bussotiim, F., 2003. Within- and among-tree variation in leaf morphology of Querqus petraea(Matt.) Liebl. natural populations. Trees.17: 164-172.


23. Evans, J.R., Poorter, H., 2001. Photosynthetic acclimation of plants to growth irradiance: the relative importance of specific leaf area and nitrogen partitioning in maximizing carbon gain. Plant Cell Environ. 24, 755–767.


24. Sultan, S.E., Bazzaz, F.A., 1993. Phenotypic plasticity in Polygonum persicaria. I. Diversity and uniformity in genotypic norms of reaction to light. Evolution 47, 1009–1031.


25. Sultan, S.E., Wilczek, A.M., Bell, D.L., Hand, G., 1998. Physiological response to complex environments in annual Polygonum species of contrasting ecological breadth. Oecologia 115, 564–578.


26. Messier, C., Nikinmaa, E., 2000. Effects of light availability and sapling size on the Growth of Cupressus iustianica Mill. at 28 Months in Costa Rica. Silvae Genetica 45, 2-3.


27. Paquette, A., Bouchard, A., Cogliastro, A., 2007. Morphological plasticity in seedlings of three deciduous species under shelterwood under-planting management does not correspond to shade tolerance ranks. Forest Ecology and Management.


28. Joesting, H M., McCarthy, B. C., Brown K. J. 2009. Determining the shade tolerance of American chestnut using morphological and physiological leaf parameters. Forest Ecology and Management. 257. 280-286.


29. ثابتی. ح، 1355، درختان و درختچه های ایران، انتشارات دانشگاه تهران، 431 صفحه.


30. Jachson, L.W.R., 1967. Effect of shade on leaf structure of deciduous tree species. Ecology, 48: 488- 499.