• Home
  • Climate Regulation and Soil by Development of Green Space in an Arid Zone

Share To

Article Url


Manuscript ID : 2561 Visit : 113 Page: 31 - 41

Article Type: Original Research

Climate Regulation and Soil by Development of Green Space in an Arid Zone

Subject Areas : environmental management

Azadeh Salehi 1 ( Ph.D. Student in Forestry, Tarbiat Modares University )
Masoud Tabari Kocheksaraei 2 ( Associate Professor, Forestry Department, Tarbiat Modares University )

Received: 2009-04-04 Accepted : 2010-01-24 Published : 2014-02-20

Keywords: Climate regulation, Carbon sequestration, green space, Municipal effluent, Pinus&#x0D, &#x0D, eldarica, Robinia pseudoacacia,

Abstract :

The simplest and most economical technique to reduce CO2 of atmosphere and climate regulationis carbon sequestration in plant and soil by development of vegetation and green space. Impact ofafforestation and soil fertility on soil carbon sequestration and climate regulation was investigated, intwo 15-year old stands of needle-leaved (Pinus eldarica) and broad-leaved (Robinia pseudoacacia) in2 areas with different irrigation treatments (municipal effluent and well water) and also a control area(without afforestation), in an arid zone (south of Tehran).For this purpose, sample plots (30 m × 30 m) were systematic-randomly chosen in either of bothstands. In each sample plot, four soil profiles were dug to take the samples in depths of 0-15, 15-30and 30-60 cm. In laboratory, soil organic carbon (SOC) content of soil samples was determined by theWalkley–Black method.The results demonstrated that in each stand there was a significant difference (p<0.01) in theamount of soil carbon sequestration between two irrigation treatments (municipal effluent and wellwater). No significant difference in the amount of soil carbon sequestration of two stands wasdetected, but each stand sequestered higher carbon content in soil compared to that of in control area.In two studied stands, with increasing of soil carbon content, growth parameters and biomasssignificantly (p<0.01) were increased.With regard to more average of wood biomass and carbon sequestration and be evergreen of elderpine trees, can say that afforestation of eldar pine in comparison with block locust has more role indecreasing of air pollution and climate regulation.

References:


  1. Rosso, D., Stenstrom, M.K., 2008. The carbon-sequestration potential of municipal wastewater treatment. Chemosphere, 70: 1468-1475.
    2.
  2. Mann, M.E., Rutherford, S., Bradley, R.S., Hughes, M.K., Keimig, F.T., 2003. Optimal surface temperature reconstructions using terrestrial borehole data. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108: 4203-4213.
    3.
  3. Follett, R.F., 2001. Soil management concepts and carbon sequestration zin cropland soils. Soil & Tillage Research, 61: 77-97.
    4.

  1. بردبار، ک. و مرتضوی جهرمی، م. 1385. بررسی پتانسیل ذخیره کربن در جنگل­کاری­های اکالیپتوس و آکاسیا در مناطق غربی استان فارس. مجله پژوهش و سازندگی، شماره 70، ص 103-90.

    1. Batjes, N.H., 1998. Mitigation of atmospheric CO2 concentrations by increased carbon sequestration in the soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 27: 230-235.
      2.

  2. ترابیان، ع. و هاشمی، ف. 1378. آبیاری فضای­ سبز با پساب تصفیه شده تصفیه­خانه­های تهران. مجله آب و فاضلاب، شماره 29، ص 36 – 31.
    3.
  3. جزیره‌ای، م. ح. 1381. جنگل­کاری در خشک­بوم. انتشارات دانشگاه تهران، 458 ص.

    1. Jayaraman, K., 2000. A Statistical Manual for Forestry Research. FORESPA Publication., 240 pp.
      2.
    2. Yadav, R.K., Goyal, B., Sharma, R.K., Dubey, S.K., Minhas, P.S., 2002. Post-Irrigation Impact of Domestic Sewage Effluent on Composition of Soils, Crops and Ground Water-a Case Study. Environment International, 28:481- 486.
      3.

  4. حبیبی کاسب، ح. 1371. مبانی خاکشناسی جنگل. انتشارات دانشگاه تهران، 424 ص.
    5.
  5. زرین کفش، م. 1372. حاصلخیزی خاک و تولید. انتشارات دانشگاه تهران. 320 ص.
    6.
  6. زبیری، م. 1379. آماربرداری در جنگل (اندازه­گیری درخت و جنگل). انتشارات دانشگاه تهران، 401 ص.  

    1. Brown, S., Gillespie, A.J.R., Lugo, A.E., 1989. Biomass estimation methods for tropical forests with applications to forest inventory data. Forest Science, 35:881-902.
      2.
    2. Peters, R., 1977. Fortalecimiento al sector forestal Guatemala inventarios y estudios dendrometricos en bosque de coniferas. FO: DP/GUA/72/006, Informe Tecnico 2, FAO, Rome, Italy.
      3.
    3. Lindaman H.R., 1992. Analysis of Variance in Experimental Design. Springer-Verlag, New York.
      4.
    4. Luxmoore, R.J., Tharp, M.L. Post, W.M., 2008. Simulated biomass and soil carbon of loblolly pine and cottonwood plantations across a thermal gradient in southeastern United States. Forest Ecology and Management, 254: 291-299.
      5.
    5. Singh, G., Bhati, M., 2005. Growth of Dalbergia sissoo in desert regions of western India using municipal effluent and the subsequent changes in soil and plant chemistry. Bioresource Technology, 96 (9):1019-1028.
      6.
    6. Guo, L.B., Sims, R.E.H., Horne, D.J., 2002. Biomass production and nutrient cycling in Eucalyptus short rotation energy forests in New Zealand: I. Biomass and nutrient accumulation. Bioresource Technology, 85(3): 273-283.
      7.
    7. Guo, L.B., Sims, R.E.H., Horne, D.J., 2006. Biomass production and nutrient cycling in Eucalyptus short rotation energy forests in New Zealand: II. Litter fall and nutrient return. Biomass and Bioenergy, 30: 393-404.
      8.
    8. Emongor, V.E. Ramolemana, G.M., 2004. Treated sewage effluent (water) potential to be used for horticultural production in Botswana. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 29: 1101-1108.
      9.
    9. Ceulemans, R.J., Pontailler, F.M., Guittet, J., 1993. Leaf allometry in young poplar stands: reliability of leaf area index estimation, site and clone effects. Biomass and Bioenergy, 4: 769-776.
      10.
    10. Myers, B.J., Theiveyanath, S.O., Brian, N.O., Bond, W.J., 1996. Growth and water use of Eucalyptus grandis and Pinus radiata plantations irrigated with effluent. Tree Physiology, 16: 211-219.
      11.

  7. محمودی طالقانی، ع.، زاهدی امیری، ق.، عادلی، ا.، ثاقب طالبی، خ. 1386. برآورد میزان ترسیب کربن خاک در جنگل های تحت مدیریت (مطالعه موردی جنگل گلبند در شمال کشور). مجله تحقیقات جنگل و صنوبر، شماره 15، ص241-252.

    1. Jepsen, M.R., 2006. Above-ground carbon stocks in tropical fallows, Sarawak, Malaysia. Forest Ecology and Management, 225: 287-295
      2.

  8. مجد طاهری، ح.، جلیلی، ع. 1375. بررسی مقایسه­ای اثرات جنگل­کاری با کاج الداریکا و اقاقیا روی برخی از خصوصیات فیزیکی و شیمیایی خاک و پوشش گیاهی زیر اشکوب. مجله پژوهش و سازندگی، شماره 32، ص 15-7.

    1. Delgado calvo Flores, R., Serrano Molina, G., parraga Martinez, J., 1987. Analysis of some of the modification induced by the establishment of conifers on soils of the Sierra Nevada (Granada, Spain). Agrochemical, 31: 211-225.
      2.
    2. O’Connell, A.M., Sankaran, K.V., 1997. Organic matter accretion, decomposition and mineralisation. In: Nambiar, E.K.S., Brown, A.G. (Eds.), Management of Soil, Nutrients and Water in Tropical Plantation Forests. Australian Center for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR), Canberra, ACT, Australia, pp. 443-480.
      3.
    3. Paul, K.I., Polglase, P.J., Nyakuengama, J.G., Khanna, P.K., 2002. Change in soil carbon following afforestation. Forest Ecology and Management, 168: 241-257
      4.
    4. Yemshanov, D., McKenney, D., Fraleigh, S., D'Eon, S., 2007. An integrated spatial assessment of the investment potential of three species in southern Ontario, Canada inclusive of carbon benefits. Forest Policy and Economics, 10: 48-59
      5.
    5. Harrison, A.F., Howard, P.J.A., Howard, D.M., Howard, D.C., Hornung, M., 1995. Carbon storage in forest soils. In: Greenhouse Gas Balance in Forestry. Forestry Research Coordination Committee Conference, November 1994, 335-348 pp.
      6.
    6. Richter, D.D., Markewitz, D., Trumbore, S.E., Wells, C.G., 1999. Rapid accumulation and turnover of soil carbon in a reestablishing. Forest Nature, 400: 56-58.
      7.
    7. Binkley, D., Resh, S.C., 1999. Rapid changes in soils following Eucalyptus afforestation in Hawaii. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 63: 222-225.
      8.
    8. Brand, D.G., Cowie, A., Lamb, K., 2000. Developing the products and markets for carbon sequestration in planted forests. In: The Future of Eucalypts for Wood Products, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia, March 19-24, 2000, 52-63 pp.
      9.
    9. Gifford, R.M., 2000. Changes in soil carbon following land-use changes in Australia. National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Development Project Report. Environment Australia, Canberra, ACT, Australia, 1999.
      10.
    10. Turner, J., Lambert, M.J., 2000. Change in organic carbon in forest plantation soils in eastern Australia. Forest Ecology and Management, 133: 231-247.
      11.
    11. Paul, K.I., Jacobsen, K., Koul, V., Leppert, P., Smith, J., 2008. Predicting growth and sequestration of carbon by plantations growing in regions of low-rainfall in southern Australia. Forest Ecology and Management, 254: 205-216.
      12.

  9. نی­ریزی، س. 1377. استفاده مجدد از فاضلاب تصفیه شده، راهکار تامین منابع آب. مجله آب و محیط زیست، شماره 34، ص6-4.
    10.
  10. ثابت رفتار، ع. 1380. گزارش ملی مدیریت تقاضا حفاظت و کنترل آلودگی آب در ایران. اولین کنفرانس منطقه­ای مدیریت تقاضا حفاظت و کنترل آلودگی آب، اردن، ص 30-22.
    11.

  1. Brevik, E., Fenton, T., Moran, L., 2002. Effect of soil compaction organic carbon amounts and distribution, South-Central Iowa. Environmental Pollution, 116: 137-141.
    2.
  2. Toyota, A., Kaneko, N., T.Ito, M., 2006. Soil ecosystem engineering by the train millipede Parafontaria laminata in a Japanese larch forest. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 38: 1840-1850.
    3.
  3. Huntington, T.G., 1995. Carbon sequestration in an aggrading forest ecosystem in the southeastern USA. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 59: 1459-1467.  
    4.
  4. Korner, C., 2003. Carbon limitation in trees. Journal of ecology, 91: 4-17.
    5.
  5. Yemshanov, D., McKenney, D., Fraleigh, S., D'Eon, S., 2007. An integrated spatial assessment of the investment potential of three species in southern Ontario, Canada inclusive of carbon benefits. Forest Policy and Economics 10: 48-59.
    6.
  6. Yan, H., Cao, M., Liu, J., Tao, B., 2007. Potential and sustainability for carbon sequestration with improved soil management in agricultural soils of China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 121: 325-335.
    7.

  1. Gasco´, G., Lobo, M.C., 2007. Composition of Spanish waste water sludge and effects on treated soil and olive trees. Waste Manage, 27 (11): 1494-1500.
    2.
  2. Meli, S., Porto, M., Belligno, A., Bufo, S.A., Mazzatura, A., Scopa, A., 2002. Influence of irrigation with lagooned urban wastewater on chemical and microbiological soil parameters in a citrus orchard under Mediterranean condition. Science of the Total Environment, 285: 69-77.
    3.
  3. Ramirez-Fuentes, E., Lucho-Constantino, C., Escamilla-Silva, E., Dendooven, L., 2002. Characteristics and carbon and nitrogen dynamics in soil irrigated with waste water for different lengths of time. Bioresource Technology, 85 (2): 179-187.
    4.
  4. Toze, S., 2006. Reuse of effluent water-benefits and risks. Agricultural water Management, 80 (1-3): 147-159.
    5.
  5. Marland, G., West, T.O., Schlamadinger, B., Canella, L., 2003. Managing soil organic carbon in agriculture: the net effect on greenhouse gas emissions. Chemical and physical Meteorology, 55: 613-621.
    6.
  6. Dendoncker, N., Wesemael, B.V., Rounsevell, M.D.A., Roelandt, C., Lettens, S., 2004. Belgium’s CO2 mitigation potential under improved cropland management. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 103: 101-116.
    7.

Sanad

Sanad is a platform for managing Azad University publications

Links

Related Centers

Technical Support

Official pages

The rights to this website are owned by the Raimag Press Management System.
Copyright © 2021-2024

Home| Login| About Us| Contact Us|
[فارسی] [العربية] [fa] [ar]