Evaluation of Ecological Capability of Ahar, Kalibar and Varzeghan Cities for Urban Development

Subject Areas : GIS

Nafiseh Rezapoor Andabili ¹ ( PhD Student, Environmental Feld (trend: assessment and land use planning), Malayer University, Iran. *(Corresponding Athours) )
mehrdad mirsanjari ² ( Assistant Professor, Malayer University, Iran )

Received: 2016-10-17 Accepted : 2017-05-19 Published : 2020-04-20

Keywords: Urban development, Geographic, Evaluation of Ecological Capability, zonation,

Abstract :

Background and Objective: Evaluation of ecological capability is a process which attempts to establish an appropriate and balanced development between human and nature through adjusting their relationship. The aim of this study is to evaluate ecological capability of urban development landuse in Ahar, Kalibar and Varzeghan cities. Method: Evaluation process of ecological capability of current study involves three main parts: the ecological capability of the underlying studied area was determined after identification of ecological resources, data analysis and conclusion. Information layers used in this study involved: soil, climate, plant cover and land shape. Findings: Ahar, Kalibar and Varzaghan cities are located in the northwest of East Azarbaijan province with a total of 930214 hectares. The surveys show that about 300,000 are in the first floor, about 293,000 are in the second floor and about 141,000 are in the third category of urban development. Discussion and Conclusion: The findings indicate that the integration of information layer using GIS has the high ability to evaluate the urban development landuse. According to the result and findings and the three mentioned cities have good potential for urban development.

References:

1. Ali Sheikh, A., 2006, Designing New Model of the Evaluation of Iran Ecologic Power for the Applies Establishment of Urban and Service Development, Geomantic Conference, The Country's Mapping Organization.


2. LY, Z, SS, C, JW, Q, 2016, Ecological carrying capacity assessment of diving site: A case study of Mabul Island, Malaysia, J Environ Manage, 253-258.


3. Naghdi, A, Sadeghi, R, Challenging Marginalization of Urban Sustainable Development (with Emphasis on Hamedan City), 2006, Journal of Social Welfare, 213-233. (In Persian)


4. Mirktouli, J, Kanani, M, Evaluation of Ecological Capacity of Urban Development Land Use with Multi-criteria Decision Making Model (GCDM) and GIS (Case Study: Sari County, Mazandaran Province), 2011, Journal of Human Geography Research, 75-88. (In Persian)


5. Mohammadi, M, Malekipour, E, Sahebghariani, A, Modeling of Urban Expansion on Lands Using Automated Cells (CA) and Hierarchical Analysis Process (AHP) Case Study: Isfahan Region 7, 2013, Studies and Researches Urban and Regional, 1-22. (In Persian)


6. Nouri, J, Jouzi, S.A, 2002, Evaluation of ecological capability of west and north west of Tehran for ultimate urban development, Pakistan Journal of biological science, vol. 5, pp 988-993.


7. Masoudi, M, Jokar, P, Sadeghi, M, Ecological assessment of urban, rural and industrial development of Sarab city, 2015, Iranian Journal of Natural Ecosystems, 49-58. (In Persian)


8. Wei, Y, Huang, C, Lam, P, Sha, Y, Feng, Y, 2015, Using Urban-Carrying Capacity as a Benchmark for Sustainable Urban Development: An Empirical Study of Beijing, Sustainability, Vol.7, pp 3244-3268.


9. Wang, S, Shang, M, Zho, Y, Lio, W, Wang, F, Wang, L, 2017, Resources and environmental carring capacity using RS and GIS, Pol. J. Environ. Stud., Vol. 26, pp. 1-8.


10. Jun, M, kim, J, Kim, H, Yeo, C, 2017, Effects of Two Urban Development Strategies on Changes in the Land Surface Temperature: Infill versus Suburban New Town Development, Technical Papers.


11. Faraji, H, Langroodi, H, Yadollahi, J, Karimzadeh, H, Ranking of Tourism Development Areas in Rural Areas, Using Gray Topsis (Case Study: Rural Areas of Varzegan County), 2012, Research Journals 1-25. (In Persian)


12. Pourftahi, J, Ashouri, A, Analysis of Spatial Inequality of Rural Housing in Ahar County, 2010, Journal of Geographical Space, 116-195.(In Persian)


13. Jomehpour, M, Eidy, H, Qualitative research on the quality of life of seasonal rural youth labor migrants from Kalibar to Tehran, 2013, Journal of Local Development,111-132. (In Persian)


14. Tayebi, M, Gharagozloo, A, Mirktouli, J, Farrokhzad, M, Spatial Modeling of Urban Physical Development Based on Environmental Capacity (Case Study: Gorgan City), 2012, Urban Construction Journal.


15. Yavuz, F, Baycan, T., 2013. Use of swot and analytic hierarchy process integration as a participatory decision making tool in watershed management. Procedia Technology, vol. 2, pp 357-375.


16. Shenavr, Bamshad, Hoseini, Mohsen, 2014, Comparison of Multi-criteria evaluation for land capability assessment for urban development in GIS, Inrenational journal of geomatix and geosciences, Vol. 4, NO. 3.


17. Kang, Peng, Xu, Linyu, 2010, the urban ecological regulation based on ecological carrying capacity, Procedia Environmental Sciences, Vol. 2, pp 1692-1700.


18. Beheshti, Ziba, Monavari, Masoud, 2017, Evaluating Ecological Capability of Urban Land-Use through Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) and GIS: A Case Study of Sahand, Journal of Geography and Urban Space Development, Vol.4, pp 1-3.


19. Azeri, P, Shirzadi, A, Evaluation of Ecological Capacity of Urban Development Using Integration of Hierarchical Analysis Process and GIS (Case Study: Baghmalek City), 2016, Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 1-12. (In Persian)