The role of librarians and Librarianship in the meta-analysis and meta-analysis studies

Subject Areas : Journal of Information Systems and Services

Maliheh  Dalili Saleh ¹ (PhD Student of Information Sciences and Knowledge Studies, Payame Noor University, Mashhad, Iran)
Soraya  Ziaee ² (Assistant Professor, Faculty of Information Sciences and Knowledge Studies, Payame Noor University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran)

Received: 2016-07-09 Accepted : 2016-11-29 Published : 2016-11-21

Keywords: : Meta-Analysis, Systematic Review, Information Science, Knowledge,

Abstract :

Purpose: Systematic review is detailed and gives a comprehensive overview of studies in a specific area to researchers. Meta-analysis is a statistical procedure to combine information obtained from a systematic review investigated. Because of librarians expertise and skills for working and participating in these studies their association seem to be necessary. On the one hand we decided to deal with the role of librarians in the research team of meta-analysis on the other hand to the meta-analysis studies in the field of information by them. Methodology: This study is a librarian research with available study in these area. Findings: In this study we deal with the expressed process of systematic review and meta-analysis research as well as meta-analysis research by the librarians. Conclusion: These studies began in 1966 and since 1999 librarians joined the research team of meta-analysis, as researcher. Librarians with knowledge of the techniques of meta-analysis and ability to use of it and as a objective observer can actively participate in a meta-analysis project. Also in the field of information began in 1992, which were more focused on "information system". Conclusion: Understanding of the role of meta-analysis approach will be useful for future researches in the field of information. The meta-analysis studies on other topics, demonstrating the benefits of this approach in the investigation, so use of loads to improvement of the position of information and knowledge. Researchers in iran have done less to meta-analysis approach in the field of information, the reason for this lack of orientation can be no full and free access to full-text sources. Advances in knowledge analysis and reporting guidelines to improve the quality, scope and application of the results are the meta-analysis benefits and using this approach can be taken for the promotion of information science and knowledge.

References:

دولانی، ع. (1393). فراتحلیل مطالعات پذیرش فناوری اطلاعات در پایگاه های استنادی ISI, SCOPUS & ISC. دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات.

مهری, ن. (1390). فقر فراتحلیل در پژوهش های علوم اجتماعی در ایران. فصلنامه پژوهش اجتماعی, 4(11), 149–170.

نسرین, س. (1385). مروری بر مبانی فراتحلیل. رو­ا نشناسان ایرانی، 3(10), 169–171.

Ankem, K. (2005). Approaches to meta-analysis: A Guide for LIS researchers. Library and Information Science Research, 27, 164–76.

Ankem, K. (2005a). Approaches to meta-analysis: A guide for LIS researchers. Library & Information Science Research, 27(2), 164–176. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2005.01.003

Ankem, K. (2005b). Types of information needs among cancer patients: a systematic review,. LIBRES. Retrieved from http://libres.curtin.edu.au/libres15n2/index.htm

Ankem, K. (2005c). Use of information sources by cancer patients: results of a systematic review of the research literature. Professor T.D. Wilson. Retrieved from http://www.informationr.net/ir/11-3/paper254.html

Ankem, K. (2006). Factors influencing information needs among cancer patients: A meta-analysis. Library & Information Science Research, 28(1), 7–23. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2005.11.003

Ankem, K. (2008, September 11). Evaluation of method in systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in LIS. Library and Information Research. Retrieved from http://www.lirgjournal.org.uk/lir/ojs/index.php/lir/article/view/58

Balk E, B. P. (2015). Systematic review and meta-analysis. Retrieved from http://www.uptodate.com/contents/systematic-review-and-meta-analysis

Borenstein, M, Hedges, LV, Higgins, JP, Rothstein, H. (2011). Introduction to Meta-Analysis - Wiley. Retrieved from http://eu.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-EHEP002313.html

Cooper, I. D., & Crum, J. A. (2013). New activities and changing roles of health sciences librarians : a systematic review , 1990 – 2012, 101(October).

Diana B. (2013). Systematic Reviews: the Health Librarian’s role in providing Faculty support. In LIANZA Conference, Hamilton, New Zealand: Wai-Ora, Wai-Māori, Waikato.

Egger M, S. G. (1997). Meta-analysis. Potentials and promise. BMJ, 315(7119), 1371–4.

Eldredge, B. J. D., & Ph, D. (2000). Evidence-based librarianship : an overview, 88(October), 289–302.

Fareena Sultan, J. U. F. and D. R. L. (1990). A Meta-Analysis of Applications of Diffusion Models. American Marketing Association, 27(1), 70–77. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3172552

Glass, G. (2000). Meta-analysis at 25. Arisona State University,. Arisona State University, College of Education. Retrieved from http://www.gvglass.info/papers/meta25.html

Harris, B. M. R. (2005). The librarian ’ s roles in the systematic review process : a case study*, 93(January), 81–87.

Ioannidis JP, L. J. (1999). Pooling research results: benefits and limitations of meta-analysis. J Comm J Qual Improv, 25(9), 462–9.

Ke, Q., & Cheng, Y. (2015). Applications of meta-analysis to library and information science research: Content analysis. Library & Information Science Research. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2015.05.004

Koufogiannakis, D, Buckingham, J, Alibhai, A, R. (2005). Impact of librarians in first-year medical and dental student problem-based learning (PBL) groups: a controlled study. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 22, 189–95.

Koufogiannakis, D. (2012). The State of Systematic Reviews in Library and Information Studies. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 7(2), 91–5.

Librarians’ Roles in Producing Systematic Reviews. (2016). Biomedical Library University of South Alabama. Retrieved from http://biomedicallibrary.southalabama.edu/library/?q=bf-sysrev

McGowan, J., & Sampson, M. (2005). Systematic reviews need systematic searchers. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 93(1), 74–80. Retrieved from http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=545125&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract

Meta-Analysis. (2015). Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta-analysis

metaanalysis article.pubmed. (2015). Retrieved December 11, 2015, from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed

O’Connor, A., & Sargeant, J. (2015). Research synthesis in veterinary science: Narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Veterinary Journal (London, England : 1997), 1–7. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.08.025

Petticrew, M, Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the social sciences: A Practical Guide. Blackwell Pub, Malden MA nad Oxford UK.

Schell CL, R. R. (1992). Meta-analysis: a tool for medical and scientific Discoveries. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 80(3), 219–22.

Systematic review searching. (2015). Retrieved from hlwiki. slais. ubc. ca/index. /Systematic_review_searching

Uman, L. S. (2011). Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Information Management for the Busy Practitioner. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 20(1), 57–59.

Urquhart, C. (2010). Systematic reviewing, meta-analysis and meta-synthesis for evidence-based library and information science. Information Research, 15(3), 708. Retrieved from http://informationr.net/ir/15-3/colis7/colis708.html