Investigation and analysis of the most important challenges of the relationship between Agricultural research and Agricultural extension in Hamadan province

Subject Areas : Agricultural Extension and Education Research

heshmatollah saadi ¹ ( Associate Professor, Dep. Agri. Extension and Education, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran )
mahbobeh ataei ² ( Ms. Student Dep. Agri. Extension and Education, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran )
fatemeh habibi ³ ( Ms. Student Dep. Agri. Extension and Education, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran )
karim i naderi mahdie ⁴ ( Karim N. Mahdiei Associate Professor, Dep. Agri. Extension and Education, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran )
fatemeh ali tavakoli ⁵ ( Ph. D. Student Dep. Agri. Extension and Education, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran )

Received: 2021-08-11 Accepted : 2022-02-27 Published : 2022-02-20

Keywords: Agricultural extension, organizational relashenship, Agricultural research,

Abstract :

the lack of effective communication between agricultural extension and the research department is an important obstacle in the success of Agri. extension. The present study was conducted to investigate and analyze the main causes of the challenge of the relationship between Agri. research and Agri. Extension from the perspective of experts and specialists in these two important areas in agricultural development. the statistical population is experts of the research and extension department in Hamadan province (N = 267). 135 people were selected from the total population at random in two stages and their opinions were analyzed. The main research tool is a researcher-made questionnaire. The reliability of the questionnaire was confirmed by Cronbach's alpha and ordinal theta. Exploratory factor analysis has been used to find the main structures. Also, SmartPLS software was used to determine the factor share and Amos software was used to evaluate the model fit. Research results show There are four factors influencing the weak relationship betwin agri. research and Agri. Extension at the farm level. The emphasis on conscientiousness instead of institutionalism, Weakness of research needs assessment in the structure of agricultural research, Organizational pride, especially in the field of research and Weakness in organizational communication. Finally suggested: Agri. Extension and Agri research should pay attention to the effectiveness of activities and not just to the task. Second, These two organizations should stay away from the negative part of organizational pride so that they can communicate effectively with each other.

References:

حسینی، س م، و اسکندری، ف. (1387). سازوکارهای ارتباطی موجود میان تحقیق و ترویج کشاورزی از دیدگاه کارشناسان. علوم ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی ایران، دوره4، شماره 2،صص 10-1.

رسولی آذر، س و فعلی، س. (1392). شناسایی عوامل موثر بر ارتباط بین ترویج و تحقیق از دیدگاه کارشان ترویج استان آذربایجان غربی. مجله پزوهش­های ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، سال ششم، دوره4، شماره24،صص 60-47.

صفری، ع.، ع. نصر اصفهانی و ر. عیدیزاد (1396). بررسی پیامدهای غرور سازمانی؛ رویکرد رفتاری. فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی مطالعات مدیریت)بهبود و تحول(، 26 (85).

علیپور، ح، چیذری، م، و فرج الله حسینی، س. ج(1384). بررسی عوامل موثر بر ارتباط تحقیق- ترویج و کشاورزی در نظام دانش و اطلاعات کشاورزی ایران. مجله پژوهش و سازندگی در زراعت  باغبانی، شماره 69، 95-87.

نظری، راضیه و صدیقی، حسن،(1386). سیستم های ارتباطی تحقیق - ترویج و کشاورز در ایران، ششمین کنفرانس اقتصاد کشاورزی ایران، مشهدhttps://civilica.com/doc/46960.

نظری، ز. م. احمدوند، پ. فلسفی، ک. رضایی مقدم (1399). راهکارهای بهبود عملکرد ترویج کشاورزی برای دستیابی به امنیت غذایی از دیدگاه صاحب نظران ترویج کشاورزی. فصلنامه پژوهش مدیریت آموزش کشاورزی شماره 52  بهار 99.

نوروزی، عباس و ملک محمدی، ایرج (1386) مشکلات ارتباط تحقیق و ترویج و سازکارهای ارتباطی ممکن. اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه، سال پانزدهم، شماره 58،صص 150-135.

Kraemer, T., & HJ Gouthier, M. (2014). How organizational pride andemotional exhaustion explain turnover intentions in call centers: A multi-groupanalysis with gender and organizational tenure.Journal of ServiceManagement,25(1), 125-14.

Adesoji S. and Tunde A (2012). Evaluation of the linkage system of Research- Extension-Farmers in Oyo State, Nigeria: Lesson for Agricultural Extension Administrators. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development. Vol. 4(20), pp. 561-568.

Adugna Eneyew (2013). A Review on Untied efforts: The challenges for improved research, extension and education linkages. Educational and research reviews. Vol. 8(12), pp. 792-799.

Arnon, Itzhak (1989), Agricultural research and technology transfer, Elsevier Science Publishing.

Asopa, V.N., & Beye, G. 1997. Management of Agricultural research: a training manual. Module 8: Research extension Linkage. FAO, Roma.

Belay Kasa (2002). Constraints to agricultural extension work in Ethiopia: the insiders' view S. Afr. J. Agric. Ext./S. Afr. Tydskr. Landbouvoorl. Vol. 31.

Bhuiyan, S.I. 1996. An Analysis of the Agricultural knowledge and Information System- Research extension Linkage in Bangladesh. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Wisconsin- Madison.

Bill, F. (2007). Improving Research and Extension. American Farmland Trust. Policy Recommendation. Retrieved from: www.farmland.org /programs /.../ AFT_PublicHealthFarmPolicy_2006.pdf.

Davis K, Swanson B, Amudavi D, Daniel A, Flohrs A, Riese J, Lamb C, Elias Z (2010). In-Depth Assessment of the Public Agricultural Extension System of Ethiopia and Recommendations for Improvement IFPRI Discussion Paper 01041 December 2010.

Elias Z, and Agajie T (2001). The History, Present Challenges and Future Approaches to Agricultural Technology Transfer in Ethiopia. Proceedings Governance and Sustainable Development: Promoting Collaborative Partnership. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, June 3-6. 2001.

Fasil K, Habtemariam K (2006). Assessment of the Current Extension System of Ethiopia: A Closer Look at Planning and Implementation, Addis Ababa Ethiopia. Issue Paper Series No. 2/2006.

Feder G, Anderson JR, Birner R, Deininger K (2010). Promises and Realities of Community-Based Agricultural Extension IFPRI Discussion Paper 00959. ISNAR, Annual Report (2001). The Hague: International Service for Agricultural Research. 2001. [From]: http://www.cgiar.org/isnar/.

Mclaren, T. and Jones, Q. (1993). Research extension working together does conflicts exist? Greating up for future Extension Conference. Volume one Presented papers, Queesland: Departmen of Primery Industries, 29-31.

Mehadi Egie (2012). Agricultural and Rural Innovation Approaches. M.Sc. students Teaching Material in Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia.

Pascucci, S., & de-Magistris, T. (2011). The effects of changing regional Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System on Italian farmers’ strategies. Agricultural Systems, 104(9): 746-754.

Pezeshki-Raad, G. and E.K. Dehkordi, 2006. Linking Agricultural Research with Extension: Iranian Agricultural Researchers’ Attitude Toward Collaboration with Extension Workers. Journal of Agricultural Science Technology 8:35-46.

Qamar, K. (2001). Restructuring and strengthening the national agricultural extension system in Islamic Republic of Iran. Rome: FAO Regional Case Study Publication.

Sadighi, H. (2005). Reasearch, Education, Extension Linkages: An Annalysis of Institiutions in Developing Countries. AIAEE Proceeding of the 21 st Annual Conference San Antonio, TX, pp. 117-125.

Sewnet Y., E. Elemo and D. Derso (2015). A review of Agricultural Research, Extension and Farmers linkage in Ethiopia. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCES.  http://www.scihub.org/AJSMS 48

Squire, P.J. 2001. Preserving indigenous Agricultural knowledge and skills through research, extension and traning for sustainable agricultural development and production in third world countries: a review. Journal of Extension Systems, 17(1), 68-81.

Swanson, Burton E. (1997), Strengthening research – extension –farmer linkages, in Improving agricultural extension, A Reference Manual, F.A.O., Rome.