Assessing the Quality of Spatial Organization and Wayfinding Perception in Transitional–Interface Spaces of Residential Complexes (A Case Study: of District 6 of Shiraz)

Subject Areas : Regional Planning

mohammad hossein gharaati jahromi ¹ , Tahereh Nasr ² , hadi keshmiri ³

1 -
2 -
3 -

Received: 2025-08-09 Accepted : 2025-08-19 Published : 2025-10-05

Keywords: Transitional–Interface Spaces, Wayfinding Quality, Visual Perception, Residential Complexes, District 6 of Shiraz,

Abstract :

In recent years, the quality of transitional spaces in residential complexes has emerged as a crucial factor in helping residents find their way and improving their overall spatial experience. To fill a gap in existing research, this study investigated how these spaces influence wayfinding based on visual perception in District 6 of Shiraz. using a mixed-method approach, the research sought to answer two central questions: (1) Which visual perception components are key to wayfinding? and (2) How does the spatial layout of transitional areas affect wayfinding quality? In the qualitative phase, the research team identified core components through a detailed content analysis. For the quantitative phase, they surveyed 378 residents from nine selected complexes, using a questionnaire they had developed. the statistical analysis revealed that the average scores for environmental (2.65), human (2.72), and visual field (2.94) variables were all below optimal levels. The results also confirmed significant differences across various residential types, with lower scores found in complexes that had more blocks. Among the visual indicators, "environmental cues" (mean rank 3.76) and "spatial extent" (3.37) were the most influential, while factors like "enclosure" and "curvilinearity" had minimal impact. ultimately, a balanced combination of environmental factors (form, light, color, signage), human factors (accessibility, safety, social vitality), and visual factors (openness, field of view) is essential for improving legibility, safety, and ease of navigation. These findings offer practical guidance for designers to create residential interface zones that are more legible and easier to navigate.

References:

References

Ahmed, S., Zhao, Y., & Li, F. (2023). Spatial configuration and navigability in high-density residential blocks: A space syntax approach. Journal of Urban Design, 28(2), 145–167.
Alinaghi, S., & Giannopoulos, I. (2024). Sequential visual cues and cognitive mapping in residential navigation: Extending Downs and Stea model. Cognitive Processing, 25(1), 55–70.
Ali Niyay Motalleb, A., Shakouri, R., & Eyneifar, A. (2020). Elucidating the concept of liminality in the interaction between inside and outside boundaries in architecture. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture and Urbanism, 25(2), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2020.304505.672477 [In Persian]
Balilan Asl, L., & Sattarzadeh, D. (2015). The role of in between (interstitial) space in the spatial organization of architectural and urban elements in Iran: Case study of Tabriz city during the Qajar period. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 17(2), 169–181. [In Persian]
Dong, H., & van Ameijde, J. (2023). Spatial integration and visibility coherence in residential wayfinding: A configurational perspective. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 40(1), 55–72.
Feng, T., & Duives, D. (2023). Visual connectivity and pedestrian route choice in mixed-use developments. Journal of Transport Geography, 105, 103516.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Henderson, D., & Kubovy, M. (2022). Mental processing of complex spatial layouts: Human strategies in urban navigation. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 7(1), 15–32.
Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huang, L., Zhang, T., & Wang, S. (2024). Cultural hybrid entrances and boundary spaces: Visual design strategies for Iranian-Chinese residential complexes. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 39(1), 77–99.
Javanmardi, M., Nasr, T., & Mahdinejad, J. (2023). Formulation of principles for enhancing the quality of private residential space with a visual perception approach based on visual ecology (Video Ecology). Haft Hesār Journal of Environmental Studies, 11(46), 5–22. [In Persian]
Khozaei Ravari, M., Gharipour, M., & Tavakkoli, M. (2022). Morphological patterns and spatial legibility in Iranian residential complexes. Urban Design International, 27(2), 125–142.
Kim, S., & Kim, H. (2020). Visual landmarks and eye-tracking analysis in residential wayfinding: Experimental studies in simulated environments. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 37(4), 311–328.
Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Lazarus, R. S. (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lee, J., Park, M., & Choi, S. (2022). Lighting contrast and spatial predictability: Enhancing wayfinding clarity in housing complexes. Lighting Research & Technology, 54(7), 915–932.
Low, S. M. (1992). Symbolic ties that bind: Place attachment in the plaza. In I. Altman & S. M. Low (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 165–186). New York: Plenum Press.
Martinez, A., & Roberts, P. (2022). Surface materials, color guidance, and spatial legibility in European housing transitions. Journal of Urban Design and Development, 28(3), 243–265.
Nasr, T., Kashmiri, H., Moztarzadeh, H., & Kakaei, F. (2024). Investigation of the spatial organization performance of single-sided Pahlavi I houses in Shiraz (Case study: Zakeri House). Journal of Design and Planning in Architecture and Urbanism, 2(2), 12–24. [In Persian]
Palmer, S. E. (1999). Vision science: Photons to phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Parto, Sh., Amirkhani, A. A., & Rahnama, M. R. (2021). Exploring the role of walls in the dialectic of disjunction and conjunction. Bagh-e Nazar, Scientific Journal of Art, Architecture & Urbanism, 18(97), 17–30. [In Persian]
Qiu, L., Zhou, J., & Sun, K. (2023). Visual cues and boundary markers in transitional spaces: Their role in urban pedestrian wayfinding. Journal of Urban Design, 28(4), 512–530.
Rapoport, A. (1996). The meaning of the built environment: A nonverbal communication approach (Rev. ed.). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Sassani, M., Eyneifar, A., & Zabihi, H. (2016). Analyzing the relationship between interstitial space quality and human environmental qualities (Case study: Residential complexes in Shiraz city). Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture and Urbanism, 21(2), 69–80. [In Persian]
Stamps, A. E. (2024). Visual closure, convexity, and perceived navigability in architectural spaces. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 131(2), 487–506.
Turner, A. (2023). Isovist analysis in complex architectural layouts: Visibility fields and movement behavior. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 50(7), 1302–1321.
Wang, L., & Smith, D. (2024). The role of transitional visual openness in wayfinding within multi-storey residential complexes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 92, 102000.
Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20(2), 158–177.
Wu, X., Lin, J., & Chen, Z. (2025). Cognitive representation of spatial sequences in residential navigation: The role of prior experience and spatial knowledge. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 93, 102035.
Xu, J., Chen, H., & Lin, P. (2023). Visual legibility and wayfinding: Integrating spatial layout with visual cues in residential environments. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 50(3), 456–478.
Zhang, Y., & Huang, L. (2023). Visual permeability and boundary articulation in complex residential neighborhoods. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 38(2), 203–222.
Zhang, Y., Liu, W., & Chen, X. (2023). Combined analysis of space syntax and visual legibility for residential wayfinding improvement. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 149(4),* 04023041.