The efficiency model of construction projects in sports with the approach of education

Subject Areas : Sport Sciences Quarterly

samaneh Bakhshi moghaddam ¹ , Mohammad Reza Esmaeilzadeh Ghandehari ² , Hossein Peymanizad ³ , Hassan Fahim Devin ⁴

1 - Department of Physical Education, Mashhad branch, Islamic Azad university, Mashhad, Iran
2 -
3 - Department of physical education, Mashhad branch, Islamic Azad university, Mashhad, Iran
4 - Department of Physical Education , Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran

Received: 2024-09-27 Accepted : 2025-04-25 Published : 2025-12-18

Keywords: Efficiency model, Construction project, Sports project, Education Approach, Grounded theory,

Abstract :

The present research was conducted in a combined and survey method. The population in the qualitative part included some elites with the criterion of having experience in the field of construction projects, and in the quantitative part it included some university faculty members, managers and experts related to the subject. In the qualitative section, 19 people were interviewed using the purposeful and snowball sampling method until the content was saturated. In the following, after setting up the list, 58 people who were willing to cooperate were selected. In the qualitative part, the data theory of Strauss-Corbin's approach was used to analyze qualitative data, and in the quantitative part, structural equation modeling was used using SmartPLS version 3 software. In the qualitative section, a total of 26 factors and 173 items were identified as effective factors in the efficiency of construction projects in sports. Also, in the quantitative part, the path coefficient findings showed that all paths are positive and significant. Causal, contextual and intervening conditions are significant with direct effect coefficients of 0.262, 0.354 and 0.401 on the main outcome of the research, which is the efficiency of sports construction projects in the country. This means that all 3 factors have a positive and significant role in the main phenomenon of the research. In addition , the main result for the strategies with the standard effect coefficient of 0.858 is significant and strong. This finding shows that the identified strategies lead to the efficiency of sports construction projects in the country. Finally, the path of the strategies to the outcome was significant with a standard effect coefficient of 0.848 and had a strong intensity, which shows that if the strategies are implemented, the identified consequences can be expected in the direction of the efficiency of the country's sports construction projects

References:

آب روشن، ح (1400). عوامل موثر بر افزایش هزینه در پروژه های عمرانی شهرداری. نشریه علمی رویکردهای پژوهشی نوین مدیریت و حسابداری، 5 (17)، 283-301.
ابراهیمی, ف, نیک آیین, ز؛ سجادی هزاوه, ح (1401). شناسایی و تحلیل عوامل مؤثر بر کاهش تأخیر در پرو‌ژه‌های عمرانی ورزشی. مطالعات مدیریت ورزشی، 14 (72)، 179-206.
ابراهیمی, ف, نیک آیین, ز، سجادی هزاوه, ح(1400). ارزیابی عوامل مؤثر بر تأخیر در پروژه‌های عمرانی ورزشی با روش تحلیل سلسله مراتبی(AHP). مطالعات راهبردی ورزش و جوانان، 20 (54)، 305-318.
ادب، ح، سلوکدار، ع، سرداری راد، ا (1395). بررسی عوامل تاثیرگذار در مدیریت استراتژیک پروژه بر مبنای راهنمای پیکره دانش مدیریت پروژه (PMBOK Guide) در شرکت سایبر، دومین کنفرانس بین المللی مدیریت واقتصاد در قرن 21، تهران
جعفری، ا (1389). بررسی دلایل تاخیر پروژه های عمرانی ورزشی کشور. پایان¬نامه کارشناسی ارشد، موسسه آموزش عالی غیر انتفاعی و غیر دولتی شمال آمل، دانشکده تربیت بدنی علوم ورزشی.
حسامی، م، مشکل¬گشا، ا (1402). شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی راهبردهای اتمام پروژه‌های عمرانی ورزشی کشور. مدیریت دانش در ورزش، مقاله اماده انتشار.
خزائنی، گ، خانزادی، م، افشار، ع (1390). مدل چند معیاره ارزیابی موفقیت ایده آل پروژه های BOT، مهندسی عمران شریف، دوره 2-28، شماره 2، ص 55-45
سلطان حسینی, م, سلیمی, م و طیبی, م. (1400). تحلیل عوامل کلیدی موفقیت ساخت پروژه‌های اماکن ورزشی (مطالعه موردی: مجموعه ورزشی بزرگ نقش جهان اصفهان). مطالعات مدیریت ورزشی، 13 (66)، 171-206.
قربانی سا, ه. (1402). مروری بر مدیریت پروژه‌های عمرانی براساس معیارهای ایمنی، بهداشت و محیط زیست. نشریه عمران و پروژه، 5 (7)، 35-46.
سلیمانی، م؛ خدرویسی، ی، افکار, ع. (1402). طراحی و آزمون مدل تأمین مالی جمعی برای پروژه‌های ورزشی ملی. مدیریت دانش در ورزش.
معاونی،س، شریعتمدار، ه (1400). رتبه بندی دلایل دوباره کاری در پروژ ه های ساخت وساز ایران و بررسی اثر تکنیک های ساخت وساز ناب، نشریه مهندسی عمران امیرکبیر، دوره 53 ، شماره 1، صفحه 127 تا 148
Ahmed, A. M., Sayed, W., Asran, A., & Nosier, I. (2023). Identifying barriers to the implementation and development of sustainable construction. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(8), 1277-1288.‏
Brown,S&Clark, M (2023). Efficiency and innovation in sports construction: A case study of stadium development. Journal of Sports Facility Management, Volume 8, Issue 2, 35-46.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2014). What you should know about Megaprojects and Why: An Overview. Project Management Journal, 45(2), 6-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21409

Glaser, J. (2004). Management's role in IT project failures. Healthcare Financial Management, 21(2), 90-92. Kimotho, J. Yusuf, M. Nyang’au, S. (2023). PROJECT COST ESTIMATION AND PERFORMANCE OF SPORTS STADIA CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS IN KENYA, Vol 5, Issue 3, pp 13-25, Dec 6, 2023, © International Research
Journal Publishers, ISSN 2710-2742 (online) www.irjp.org Kruszyńska, E., &Poczta, J. (2019). Hierarchy of factors affecting the condition and development of sports and recreation infrastructure—Impact on the recreational activity and health of the residents of a city
(Poznan case study). International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(4), 556.‏ Lee, D & Wilson, A (2021). Optimizing resources for sports construction projects: A project management
approach. Construction Management and Economics, Volume 20, Issue 4. 15-22. Ma, L. and Fu, H. (2020), "Exploring the influence of project complexity on the mega construction project success: a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) method", Engineering, Construction and Architectural
Management, Vol. 27 No. 9, pp. 2429-2449. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-12-2019-0679 Müller-Frączek, I. (2021). Sports infrastructure vs. sport development in Poland. Journal of Physical
Education and Sport, 21, 1014-1020.‏ Schulenkorf, N., & Siefken, K. (2019). Managing sport-for-development and healthy lifestyles: The sport-for-
health model. Sport Management Review, 22(1), 96-107.‏ Smith, J&Johnson, E (2022). Enhancing efficiency in sports construction projects through sustainable
practices. International Journal of Sustainable Construction, Volume 12, Issue 3, 10-18. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques.
Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Tariq, J., & Gardezi, S. S. S. (2023). Study the delays and conflicts for construction projects and their mutual
relationship: A review. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 14(1), 101815.‏ Yang, J. (2021). Evaluation of Large-Scale Sports Project Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process, Hindawi,
Mobile Information Systems, Volume 2021, Article ID 9962167, 10 Zidane, Y. J. T., & Olsson, N. O. (2017). Defining project efficiency, effectiveness and efficacy. International
Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 10(3), 621-641.‏