Economic productivity of water and profitability of fodder production of cowpea, mung bean and guar under normal irrigation and drought stress conditions

Subject Areas : Research Paper

Hormoz Asadi ¹ , Vida Ghotbi ² , Ali Mostafa Tehrani ³ , Ali Mahrokh ⁴ , Ali Akbar Ghanbari ⁵

1 - Associate Prof. of Agricultural Economic Research, Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Karaj, Iran
2 - Assistant Prof. of Research, Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Karaj, Iran
3 - Assistant Prof. of Research, Animal Science Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Karaj, Iran
4 - Assistant Prof. of Research, Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Karaj, Iran
5 - Prof. of Research, Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Karaj, Iran

Received: 2022-08-05 Accepted : 2024-02-14 Published : 2024-02-14

Keywords: Summer forage legumes, Irrigation levels, Input productivity , Economic study,

Abstract :

Introduction: One of the strategic to solve the fodder shortage in the country is to use annual summer forage legumes under suitable irrigation system. Legumes are an important rich source of protein in human and animal nutrition.

Methods: This research was carried out in the research farm of Seed and Plant Improvement Institute in Karaj in Alborz province for two years in 2019 and 2020. A split-plot experiment in a randomized complete block design with three replications was conducted. Three legume species was used including cowpea, mung bean, and guar. Three irrigation treatments used including normal, medium and severe stress 60, 100, 140 mm evaporation, respectively, from the evaporation pan level of class A in the main plots, and three legume species in the main subplots. In this study, forage production return was done using profitability indices and productivity was measured using physical and economic productivity indices.

Findings: The results showed that the increase in average net income of cowpea forage production under normal irrigation to medium stress and Severe stress was estimated 48.5 and 55.1 percent and this increase in mung bean was 3.1 and 39 percent, respectively. Increase in average economic productivity of water in cowpea forage production under Severe stress condition to medium stress and normal irrigation was estimated 16.5 and 45.1 percent, respectively. Increase in average economic productivity of water in mung bean forage production under Severe stress condition to medium stress and normal irrigation was estimated 8.8 and 51.8 percent, respectively.

 

References:

1. Abbasi, F, Abbasi, N. and Tavakoli, A. 2017. Water productivity in agriculture; challenges and perspectives. Water and Sustainable Development. 4(1): 144-141. [In Persian]. DOI: 10.22067/ JWSD.V4I1. 67121
2. Abdolbagi, N.A, and Mazaheri, M. 2016. Take a look at the general situation of the water sector. Deputy of Infrastructure Research and Production Affairs. Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly of Iran. Number 14846. [In Persian].
3. Asadi, H., Mahmoudi, M and Zare, SH. 2021. Determining profitability and the economic productivity of agricultural water in crop production. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage. 15(6): 1404-1411. [In Persian]. DOI: 20.1001.1. 20087942.1400. 15.6.14.4
4. Ashour, N.I., Behairy, G.T., Abd EL-Lateef, E.M. and Selim, M.M. 2021. A preliminary study on the potentiality of intercropping of mung bean (Vigna radiata Roxb.) with dwarf grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor Moench) in Egypt. Bull NRC. Egypt. 16 (1):53.
5. Azizi, SH. 2015. Alborz province (experimental implementation). Fifth Edition. Office of writing elementary and secondary theoretical textbooks. Educational Research and Planning Organization. Iran's Ministry of Education. 118 pages. [In Persian].
6. Coetzee, J. J. 1995. Cowpea: A Traditional Crop in Africa. Africa Crop Info 95 Leaflet, Vegetable and Ornamental Plant Institute and the Grain Crops Institute, Agricultural Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.
7. Darabi, F., Sharifipour, M. and. Nrollahi, A.H. 2022. Effect of deficit irrigation on yield components and water productivity of Pinto beans using drip tape irrigation in Khorramabad climatic. Journal of Irrigation Sciences and Engineering. 44(4):1-14. [In Persian]. DOI: 10.22055/ jise. 2020.31391.1885.
8. Ebrahimnejad, H., Keramatzadeh, A., Ishragi, F., Rezaei, A. 2021. Investigating the factors affecting the physical and economic productivity of water in orange production in Ghaemshahr city. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture. 35(3): 259-275. [In Persian]. Doi: 10.22092/ jwra.2021.354273.862
9. Ghotbi, V. 2021. Comparison of water productivity, forage yield and quality of cowpea, mung bean and guar under different irrigation regimes. Final report, Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization. 48 p. [In Persian].
10. Ghotbi, V., Mahrokh, A., Mostafa Tehrani, A. and Asadi, H. 2022. Evaluation of forage yield and quality of cowpea, guar and mung bean and under drought stress conditions. Presented at the 1st international online conference on agriculture-advances in agricultural science and technology, 10-25 February. Journal of chemistry proceedings. 10(1,62): 1-6. DOI: 10.3390/IOCAG2022-12288
11. Heydari, N. 2014. Determining and evaluating water use efficiency of some major crops under the management of farmers in Iran. Journal of Water and Irrigation Management. 1(2):43-57. [In Persian].
12. Javan, J. and Falsoliman, M. 2008. Water Crisis and Agricultural Water Productivity in Arid Areas: A Case Study of Birjand Plain. Journal of Geography and Development. 11: 115-138. [In Persian]. DOI: 10.22111/GDI J.2008.1619
13. Karimi, M. And Jalini, M. 2017. Investigation of agricultural water productivity in important crops: A case study of Mashhad plain. Journal of Water and Sustainable Development. 4(1): 133-138. [In Persian]. DOI: 10.22067/jwsd.v 4i1.52783.
14. Kapital, S. 2007. Guar meal germ and hul fractions differently effect growth performance and intestinal viscosity of broiler chickens. Poultry Science. 41: 140-146.
15. Majnoon Hoseini, N. 2008. Culture and production legominous. Tehran: Tehran University Publication Jahad.
16. Mortimore, J. M. A., Singh, B. B., Harris, F. and Blade, F. S. 1997. Cowpea in traditional cropping systems. pp. 99-112. In: Singh, B. B., Mohan, Raj, D. R., Dashiell, K. E., and Jackai L. E. N. (eds.) Advances in Cowpea Research. Publishing of IITA-JIRCAS, IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria.
17. Pouran, R., Raghfar, H. Ghasemi, A.R. and Bazazan, F. 2017. Calculating the economic value of virtual water with the approach of maximizing irrigation water efficiency. Iranian Journal of Applied Economics Studies. 21(6): 189-212. [In Persian]. DOI: 10.22084/AES.2017.1803
18. Samadi Firoozabad, B. and Zand, B. 2010. Technical instructions for mung bean farming., Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Agricultural Research Center and Natural Resources, Ministry of Jihad Agriculture, Tehran Province. 15 pages. [In Persian].
19. Sadeghipour, O. 2001. Physiological Aspects of Dry Farming. Mashhad Jahad-e Daneshgahi Press. 424p. [In Persian].
20. Shahram, A. and Daneshi, N. 2005. Appropriate level of irrigation water needed in agriculture, White beans. Proceedings of the 9th Congress of Soil Science, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian].
21. Singh, B.B, Ajeigbe, H.A, Tarawali, S.A, Fernandez-Rivera, S. and Musa, A. 2003. Improving the production and utilization of cowpea as food and fodder. Field Crops Research. 84: 169-177. https://doi. org/10.1016/ S0378-4290(03)00148-5