Determining the type of relationship between runoff production and soil physical properties

Subject Areas : Subjects

Hamzeh Saeediyan ¹ (Assistant Professor, Department of Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research, Kerman Research, Education and Extension Organization, Kerman, Iran)

Received: 2021-09-08 Accepted : 2024-02-05 Published : 2024-01-21

Keywords: Clay, Kuhe Gach, Moisture, Runoff production,

Abstract :

Abstract
Introduction: Soil is an important and effective factor in the emergence and formation of any natural ecosystem and the physical properties of the soil are of considerable importance in determining the characteristics and use of soil. Soil physical properties as part of soil variables have significant effects on runoff production in different watersheds.
Methods: In this study, in order to determine the type of relationship between runoff production and physical properties of soil in different land uses of Gachsaran Formation deposits, a part of Kuhe Gach watershed of the Izeh city with an area of ​​1202 hectares was selected. Then, sampling of runoff production at 6 points with 3 replicates and at different rainfall intensities of 45, 60 and 70 mm/hour in three land uses of the range, residential area and agricultural lands with the help of the rain simulator was done. And the same number of runoff sampling, sampling of physical properties of soil such as clay, silt, sand, very fine sand and moisture content was performed. In this study, the relationship between production runoff and soil physical properties in different uses of Gachsaran Formation was determined using univariate regression. SPSS and EXCEL software were used for statistical analysis.
 Findings: The results showed that in total, in Gachsaran Formation and in all three range, agricultural and residential land uses and in all three intensities of 45, 60 and 75 mm/hour, very fine sand and moisture were showed the highest of negative relationship with runoff production and silt was showed the highest of positive relationship with runoff production.
 

References:

1.       Ahmadi, H., 2007. Applied geomorphology, 1 volume (water erosion), fifth edition, Tehran university publications, 714 p. (in Persion)

2.       Arsham, A., A.M. Akhund Ali and A.K. Behnia., 2010. Effects of Soil Antecedent Moisture Contents on Runoff and Sedimentation Values with Using Rainfall Simulator Method, Desert and Rangeland Research Journal, 16: 445-455. (in Persion)

3.       Aryal S. K, O’Loughlin E. M., Mein R. G., 2005. A similarity approach to determine response times to steady-state saturation in landscapes. Advances in Water Resources, 28(2), 99-115. DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres. 2004.10.008

4.       Beven K. J., 2011. Rainfall-runoff modelling: the primer. John Wiley & Sons. DOI:10.1002/9781119951001

5.       Castillo, V.M., A. Gomez-Plaza and M. Martinez-Mena. 2003. The Role of Antecedent Soil Water Content in the Runoff Response of Semiarid Catchments: a Simulation Approach. Journal of Hydrology, 248: 114-130. 10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00264-6

6.       DE Sutter, R., Verhoeven, R. and Krein, R., 2001, Simulation of sediment transport during flood events, labratoary work and field experiments, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 46(4): 599-610. DOI: 10.1080/02626660109492853

7.       De Wit, A. 2001. Runoff Controlling Factors in Various Sized Catchments in Semiarid Mediterranean Environmental in Spain. PhD Thesis. Utrecht University. 240 pp.

8.       Fathizadeh, H, Karimi, H., Tavakoli, M., 2016. The Role of Sensitivity to Erosion of Geological Formations in Erosion and Sediment Yield (Case Study: Sub-Basins of Doiraj river in ilam province), Journal of Watershed Management, Volume 7, No. 13, Spring and Summer. (in Persion) Doi: 10.18869/acadpub.jwmr.7.13.208

9.       Hook, J.M. 2006. Human impacts on fluvial systems in the Mediterranean region.      Geomorphology, 79, 311-335.DOI:10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.06.036

10.   kamphorst, A., 1987. A small rainfall simulator for the determination of soil erodibility, Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 35: 407-415. DOI: 10.18174/njas.v35i3.16735

11.   Kazman, Z., Shainberg, I., and Gal, M. 1983. Effect of Low Levels of Exchangeable Na and Applied Phosphogypsum on Infiltration Rate of Various Soils. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 135: 184-192.

12.   Kirkby M., 2001. Modeling the interactions between soil surface properties and water. Elsevier Catena 89-102.DOI:10.1016/S0341-8162(01)00160-6

13.   Miao, C. Y., Ni, J. R., Borthwick, A. G. L. & Yang, L., 2011. A preliminary estimate of human and natural contributions to the changes in water discharge and sediment load in the Yellow River. Global and Planetary Change, 76, 196–205. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2011.01.008

14.   Molina, A., Govers, G., Vanacker, V., Poesen, J., Zeelmaekers, E., Cisneros, F., 2007. Runoff Generation in a Degraded Andean Ecosystem: Interaction of Vegetation Cover and Land use. Catena 71: 357-370. DOI:10.1016/j.catena.2007.04.002

15.   Morady, H. R., and Saidian, H., 2010. Comparing the Most Important Factors in the Erosion and Sediment Production in Different Land Uses, Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, 4: No. 11: 1-11.

16.   Mu, W. F. Yu, C. Li, Y. Xie, J. Tian, J., and Zhao, N. 2015. Effects of rainfall intensity and slope gradient on runoff and soil moisture content on different growing stages of spring maize. Water. 7(6):2990-3008. https: //doi.org/10.3390/w7062990

17.   Orsham, A., Akhund Ali, A. M., and Behnia, A. 2010. Effect of soil antecedent moisture contents on runoff and sedimentation values with simulated rainfall method. Iranian journal of Range and Desert Research, 16(4), 445-455. (in Persion)

18.   Prathapar, S. A. and Abdulla, A. B., 2014. Impact of sedimentation on groundwater recharge at  Sahalanowt Dam, Salalah, Oman, Water International, 39(3): 381-393. DOI:10.1080/02508060.2014.895889

19.   Romos, M.C., and Martinez – Casasnovas, J.A., 2006. Trends in precipitation concentration and extremes in the Mediterranean penedes – Anoiu region. NE spain. Climate change, 74: 457-474. DOI:10.1007/s10584-006-3458-9

20.   Sabzevari T, Noroozpour S., 2014. Effects of hillslope geometry on surface and subsurface flows. Hydrogeology journal, 22(7), 1593-1604. DOI:10.1007/s10040-014-1149-6

21.   Sabzevari T, Talebi A, Ardakanian R, Shamsai A., 2010. A steady-state saturation model to determine the subsurface travel time (STT) in complex hillslopes. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 14(6),891.

22.   Sadeghi, S. H. R., Mohammadpour, K., and Dianati Tilaki, Q. A. 2010. Temporal variability of runoff coefficient in kojour summer rangelands. In: Abstracts Proceedings of 6th National Seminar on Watershed Management and 4th National Seminar on Soil Erosion and Sediment, 28–29April, Faculty of Natural Resources, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor, Iran, pp. 52. (in Persion)

23.   Saeediyan, H, Moradi, H, R, Feiznia, S, Bahramifar, N., 2014. The role of main slope aspects on Some Soil Physical and Chemical Properties (Case Study: Gachsaran and Aghajari Formations of Koohe Gagh and Margha watersheds of izeh township), Journal of Watershed Management, Volume 5, No. 9, Spring and Summer. (in Persion)

24.   Santos, F.L., Reis, J.L., Martins, O.C., Castanheria, N.L., and Serralherio, R.P. 2003. Comparative Assessment of Infiltration, Runoff and Erosion of Sprinkler Irrigation Soils. Biosystems Engineering, 86 (3): 355-364. DOI: 10.1016/S1537-5110(03)00135-1

25.   Sika, A. K., Sarma, J., Sharda. S.V. N., Samraj, P. and Akashmanam, S., 2003. Low Flow and High Flow Responses to Converting Natural Grassland in to Blugeum (Eucalyptus Globules) in Nilgiris Watersheds of South India. Journal of Hydrology, 270,12-26. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00172-5

26.   Tatsumi, K. and Yamashiki, Y., 2015, Effect of irrigation water withdrawals on water and energy balance in the Mekong River Basin using an improved VIC landsurface model with fewer calibration parameters, Agricultural Water Management, 159: 92-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.05.011

27.   Vaezi, A. R., Bahrami, H. A. Sadeghi, S. H. R. and Mahdian, M. H., 2010, Modeling relationship between runoff and soil properties in dry-farming lands, NW Iran, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 7: 2577-2607.https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-7-2577-2010, 2010.

28.   Vahabi J., and Mahdian M.H., 2008. Rainfall simulation for the study of the effects of efficient factors on runoff rate. Current Sci. 95: 1439-1445.

29.   Willy K.N., 2011. The role of the aggregate size in soil resistance and decrease erosion, Soil Science Society of America Journal, 10: 111-120.

30.   Zehtabian, Gh. 1999. Comparison of runoff and sediment content in Marl Lehbari Formation using a rain-simulation device in the Golam Mort Sub-basin, Tehran University, Research Deputy, Applied Design, 107 p. (in Persion)

31.   Zhao, B., Zhang, L., Xia, Zh., Xu, W., Xia, L., Liang, Y. & Xia, D. 2019. Effects of rainfall intensity and vegetation cover on erosion characteristics of a soil containing rock fragments slope, Hindawi Advances in Civil Engineering, 2019, 1-14. https: //doi.org/10.1155/2019/7043428