Famers Situation Encountering Uncertainty: Application of Multiple Criteria Programming

Subject Areas : Agricultural Economics Research

H. Rafie Darani ¹ (مربی و عضو هیئت علمی گروه اقتصاد جهاددانشگاهی واحد مشهد)
N. Shahnooshi ² (دانشیار گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد.)

Received: 2015-12-20 Accepted : 2015-12-20 Published : 2010-12-22

Keywords: TOPSIS, uncertainty, Khorasan Razavi Province, Multiple Criteria Programming,

Abstract :

The main objective of this paper is to study farmer's situation encountering uncertainty. The data were analyzed with multiple criteria programming and TOPSIS method. The results showed that about 74.6% farmers and 67.76% of cultivation areas in Khorasan Razavi province were not in suitable situation encountering uncertainty. Only 2.33% of farmers were in suitable situation. Finally, for improvement of farmers encountering uncertainty, diversifying farming enterprises such as development of ranching, using appropriate agricultural machinery and increase group work through rural cooperatives were recommended.  

References:

1- Akcaoz, H. and Ozkan, B. 2005. Determining risk sources and strategies

among farmers of contrasting risk awareness: A case study for Cukurova region

of Turkey. Journal of Arid Environments, 62.

2- Asgharpour, M.J. 1996. Multiple criteria decision making. University of

Tehran Press. Tehran. 

3- Chu, T.C. and Lin, Y.C. 2003. A fuzzy TOPSIS method for robot selection.

International Journal of Manufacturing Technology, 21: 284-290.

4- COAG. 2008. Gestión de los riesgos en la explotación agraria. Coordinadora

de Organizaciones de Agricultores y Ganaderos, Madrid.

5- CRED. 2008. Center for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters. In

Internet: <http://www.cred.be/>.

6- Dismukes, R., Bird, J.L. and Linse, F. 2004. Risk Management Tools in

Europe: Agricultural Insurance, Futures, and Options. US-EU Food and

Agriculture Comparisons/WRS-04–04. Economic Research Service, USDA.

7- EC (European Commission). 2007. Agricultural insurance schemes. JRC

report. Brussels.

8- Hosseini, S.S., Eravani, S. and Nikoukar, A. 2009. Investigation the effect of

Support Policies of government on income risk poultry producers in Iran.

Journal of Agricultural and Economics Development, 23(1): 88-97.

9- Khorasan Razavi Organization Agricultural Jihad . 2007. http://www.koaj.ir

10- Meuwissen, M.P.M., Huirne, R.B.M. and Hardaker, J.B. 2001. Risk and

risk management: an empirical analysis of Dutch livestock farmers. Livestock

Production Science, 69: 43–53.

11- Rejda, G. 2002. Principles of Risk Management and Insurance. AddisonWesley.

 

12- Ren, L., Yanqiong, Z., Wang, Y. and Sun, Z. 2007. Comparative analysis of

a NovelM-TOPSIS method and TOPSIS. Lifeng Ren, Institute of Biomedical

Engineering of Central South University, Changsha. China.

13- Roosta, K., Farajolahossini, S.J., Chizari, M. and Hosseini, S.M. 2009.

Investigation of Extension mechanisms which is effective on the risk

management of wheat Production in Khorasan Razavi Province. Journal of

Agricultural Science Natural Resource, 15(6): 9-21.

14- Rostami, F. 2003. Risk management of wheat production in family farming

system (acase study Harsin city). Msc Thesis. University Of Tehran.

15- Statistical Year Book of Khorasan Razavi. 2001-2007. Ostandari

Organization. Astane Ghods Press. Mashhad.

15- Statistical Year Book of Iran. 2007. http://amar.sci.org.ir.

16- Vrolijk, H.C.J., Poppe, K.J. and Wisman, J.H. 2007. Volatility of farm

incomes, prices and yields in the European Union. Working Paper (WP2,

Income Stabilisation). LEIDLO. Den Haag.

17- Wang, T., Lee, H. and W.U. C. 2007. A Fuzzy TOPSIS approach with

subjective weights and objective weights. Proceedings of the 6th WSEAS

International Conference on Applied Computer Science, Hangzhou, China,

April.

18- You, Q.H. and Ding, R.H. 2005. Negative problem of TOPSIS. Technology

Groud, 5: 25–27.