Comparison of Genetic Algorithm and Auto-Regressive Distributed Lag Method in Estimating Production Function of Iranian Agriculture

Subject Areas : Agricultural Economics Research

S. Negarchi ¹ , M.R. Zare Mehjerdi ² , H. Mehrabi Boshrabadi ³ , H. Nezamabadipour ⁴

1 - دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد اقتصاد کشاورزی دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان
2 - استادیار اقتصاد کشاورزی دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان
3 - دانشیار اقتصاد کشاورزی دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان
4 - دانشیار مهندسی برق دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان

Received: 2015-12-17 Accepted : 2015-12-17 Published : 2012-03-20

Keywords: ARDL, Genetic Algorithm, Agricultural Production,

Abstract :

Several studies have estimated production function in agriculture. Most of them have used econometric methods. Recently, the heuristic algorithms have been widely in optimization problems. In this study, genetic algorithm (GA) model has been compared with a Auto regressive distributed lag (ARDL) approach to estimate the production function in agriculture. Time series data of value added, labor, energy and capital agriculture sector was used of 1978-2008. Comparing the results of two methods based on two criteria of Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Coefficient of Determination (R2), indicated that the genetic algorithm is more efficient than the ARDL approach  

References:

1. Amir Teymouri, S. and S. Khalilian. 2008. Productivity growth in

total factor productivity in the agricultural sector of Iran and its

prospects in the fourth development plan. Journal of Agricultural

Economic and Development,59: 37-52.

2. Amjadi, M.H. Nezamabadi-pour, H. and M. M. Farsangi. 2010.

Estimation of Electricity Demand of Iran Using Two Heuristic

Algorithms. Energy Conversion and Management. 51: 493-497.

3. Canyurt O.E. and H.K. Ozturk. 2006. Three different applications

of genetic algorithm search techniques on oil demand estimation.

Energy Converstion & Management.47: 3138-48.

4. Goldberg, D. E. 1989. Genetic Algorithm in Search,

Optimization and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley.

5. Haldenbilen, S. and H. Ceylan. 2005. Genetic algorithm approach

to estimate transport energy demand in Turkey, Fuel and Energy.

46: 193-204.

6. Hamamoto, M. 2006. Environmental regulation and the

productivity of Japanese manufacturing industries. Journal of

Resource and Energy Economics. 604: 14-25.

7. Hojabr Kiani, K. and SH. Varedi. 2001. Important factor of

energy in agricultural production of Iran. . Journal of Agricultural

Economic and Development, 30: 7-41.

8. Holland, J. H. 1992. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems.

Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (First edition, 1975, University of

Michigan Press.)

9. Mehrara, M. and E. Ahmadzadeh. 2010. The impacts of total

factor productivity on the Iran economy main sectors. Journal of

Economic Research, 44(2).

10. Nezamabadi-pour, H. 2011. Genetic algorithm: Basic concepts

and advanced topics. Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman

Publications.

11. Noferesti, M. 2000. Unit root and cointegration in econometrics.

Rasa Publications, Tehran.

12. Sadeghi, H., Zolfaghari, M. and M. Heidari. 2010. Estimates of

gasoline demand in the transportation sector by using genetic

algorithm. Energy Economics Studies, 6 (21) :1-27.

13. Tahami Pour, M. and M. Shahmoradi. 2008. Measuring total

factor productivity growth in agricultural sector and serving its

proportion of added value growth. Sixth conference of

Agricultural Economics.

14. Tkacz, G. 2001 .Neural network forecasting of canadian GDP

growth , International Journal Of Forecasting, 17: 57-69.