بررسی ابعاد مختلف توسعه افقی شهر یاسوج و تاثیر آن بر اراضی زراعی پیرامون با استفاده از مدل آنتروپی شانون و ضریب موران

Subject Areas : Regional Planning

Hasan Norozi ¹ , سلیمان محمدی دوست ²

1 - دکتری علوم اقتصادی، رئیس سازمان مدیریت و برنامهریزی استان کهگیلویه و بویراحمد، یاسوج، ایران
2 - مدرس دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد یاسوج

Received: 2018-08-08 Accepted : 2019-01-27 Published : 2019-01-21

Keywords: Yasouj, physical development, Sprawl growth, farmland,

Abstract :

The city of Yasuj is one of the cities that after the Islamic Revolution has been heavily influenced by the policies of the government, and especially since 1365, its population and its area have increased considerably, and since this city is on the land of agricultural lands and natural sprats Has been devoted to urban construction, with the impact of government actions, a large part of agricultural land and forests around the city. Therefore, the aim of this research is to investigate the horizontal development of Yasuj city and its effect on the arable lands. The applied method is analytical-descriptive and in terms of its purpose. Data requirements are obtained using the library-documentary and field-based methodology. For analysis and drawing of data obtained from Excel and GIS software has been used. In this regard, in order to study the evolution, development and growth of Yasuj city during recent decades, the most important factors and mechanisms of government actions that have been effective in the physical expansion of Yasuj city have been identified and using the Shannon entropy model and Moran coefficient Uneven growth and sprawl of the city were determined. The output of Moran Mobin analysis is that the distribution of population is more dispersed than the area of the Yasuj area, indicating that the population of Yasuj is distant from the polar pattern and spatial distribution and is distributed sporadically. On the other hand, considering that the amount of entropy of Shannon Shahriarsouj in 1365 was equal to 1106/1, the closeness of the entropy value to a maximum of 20.081 represents sprawl growth (sprawl), the physical expansion of the city. At the same time, given that the amount of entropy for the year 1390 is equal to 1,207.1, this indicates that during the recent years, the physical expansion of the city has become more dispersed and non-condensed.

References:

1. Ebrahimzadeh, I, and Rafiei, Q, (2009): Optimal location of urban extensions using GIS (Geographical Information System). Geography and Development Quarterly, No. 15, pp. 70-45. (In Persian).


2. Ebrahimzadeh, I, and Rafiei, Q, (2009): An Analysis on the Pattern-Spatial Development of Marvdasht City Using Shannon and Hellendan Entropy Models and Presenting Its Future Distribution Model, Quarterly Journal of Human Geography, Number 69, Pages 70-45. (In Persian).


3. Poor Ahmad, A, Yadhqar, A and Habibi, K, (2003): A Study of the Development Process of Sanandaj City Development Using GIS and RS, The Journal of Fine Arts, No. 16, Winter, pp. 32-15. (In Persian).


4. Sheremohammadi, H and Nejibi, F, (2007): The development of the city of Chalus in light of environmental impacts (GIS), Urban Identity, No. 1, first year, pp. 38-28. (In Persian).


5. Municipality, Yasuj, (2016), Deputy Director of Planning and Development of Human Capital. (In Persian).


6. Abbaszadeh, Gh, (2005): Modeling of Urban Urban Body Growth for Sustainable Development (Case Study: Mashhad), Master thesis, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. Guided by Dr. Mohammad Rahim Rahnama. (In Persian).


7. Katie and Burton (2006): Achieving Sustainable Urban Formation, Translation from Moradi Christian, Publications, Processing and Urban Planning. (In Persian).


8. Lynch, Q, (2002): City Theory, Translated by Seyyed Hossein Bahreini, Institute of Publications and Printing of Tehran University. (In Persian).


9. Mathnavi, M, (2002): Sustainable Development and New Paradigms of Urban Development: A Comprehensive City and a Large City, Journal of Environmental Studies, No. 31. (In Persian).


10. Anderson, W. P. , Kanaroglou, P. S. and Miller, E. J. (1996): ”urban form, energy and the environment: a review of issues, evidence and policy”. Urban Studies, 33(1), pp7-35.


11. Ewing, R., (1997) Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable?. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 63.107-27.


12. Glaster, G, et.al., (2001).” Wrestling Sprawl to the Ground: Defining and Meaturing an Elusive Concept, Housing Policy Debate”, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp681-717.


13. Glasson. P. (2008). Sustainable development concept in world literature. Urban development congress in Menschen. Germany.


14. Hadly, C.C(2000) .“ Urban sprawl Indicators ,Causes and solution”,WWW.CITY.BLOMINGTON.


15. Hess, G.R (2001).” Just what is Sprawl, Anyway?”, www4. ncsu.edu/grhess.


16. Peiser, R (2001).” Decomposing urban sprawl”, Town Planning Review 72(3).


17. Pumain,D., (2003): Scaling Laws and urban systems.


18. Tsai, Yu-Hsin (2005).” Quantifying urban form: Compactness versus Sprawl”, Urban Studies, Vol.42, No1, pp141-161.


19. USEPA, (2005) Smart Growth Index (SGI) Model, US Environmental.


20. Menon, Neha(2004).“ Urban sprawl ”, Vision the journal of the WSC-SD , Vol 2, No 3.


21. .Lee, G, Wong, D.W.S (2001) Statistical analysis with Arc view GIS, USA, pp156-187 .


22. Wassmer, R. W, (2002) Influences of the Fiscalization of Land Use and Urban-Growth Boundaies, www. csus. edu/ indiv/ w/ wassmerr/ sprawl. Html.


23. Weerakoon, K.G.P.K. (2002). Integration of GIS based suitability analysis and multi criteria evaluation for urban land use planning: contribution from analytic hierarchy progress. Nugegoda: University of Sri Jayawardenepura.


24. Whitford, M. (2009), a framework for the development of event public policy: facilitating regional development, journal of cities.vol.28. pp 1- 17.