A Comparative and Analytical Study of Epic and Historical Narratives of the Qajar Era (With Emphasis on the "Shahanshahnameh" by Onvangar and the "Nasikh al-Tawarikh" by Sepehr)
Subject Areas : epic
Sorayya Shahabipourahmadi
1
,
سید امیر جهادی حسینی
2
,
Hamid Reza Kharazmi
3
,
جمشید روستا
4
1 - PhD student of Persian language and literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
2 - Associate Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
3 - هیئت علمی دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان
4 - گروه تاریخ دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان
Keywords: Nasekh alTawarikh, Shahanshahnameh onvannegar, parison, epic narrative, historicalnarrative ,
Abstract :
Throughout history, our country has been a witness to political tensions, and the scene for many military conflicts. These events, in addition to the special social, martial, and political consequences, have provided the basis for the formation of many in our rich literature. The Qajar period, in particular, was one of the most eventful eras, political, martial, and social wise, the effects of which can be clearly observed in the history of our epic and narrative literature. Among these works is Shahanshanameh, written by a most influential scriber and man of letters of the Qajar era, named Taghi Onvannegar. Narrating the events of that age from a literary perspective, closely witnessed by him and his ancestors, gives us a fresh perspective worthy of investigation. In the upcoming study, the compilers have endeavored to investigate the historical events mentioned in the work, comparing their narration with the book Naskh al-Tawarikh, written by the renowned Qajar historian Sepehr, so that the similarities and differences of the two works are revealed in terms of historical narration. In addition, the possible reasons for these similarities and differences is a matter of study and investigation. The results of this study show that the causes of these similarities and differences are mainly as follows: The use of common or different sources, human errors, mythmaking, temporal and local differences in narrations, and the narrators' motives. The research method in this study is qualitative content analysis and description. The data collection was done through questionnaires.
– صالحی، پریسا و قدرت¬الّه طاهری. (1403). «معرّفی ادبیّات تاریخی به عنوان یکی از انواع ادبی فارسی»، متن-شناسی ادب فارسی، شمارة اوّل، صص 35-17
– صفا، ذبیح الله. (1363). حماسه¬سرایی در ایران، تهران: امیرکبیر، چاپ چهارم.
– عبدالرّزاق مفتون دُنبُلی. (1389). مآثر سلطانیّه، تهران: مؤسسة انتشاراتی روزنامة ایران.
– عسکری، حسین. (1401). روستازادگان دانشمند، تهران: انتشارات سورة مهر.
– فضل¬الله شیرازی خاوری. (1380). تاریخ ذوالقرنین، تصحیح ناصر افشار، تهران: وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی.ٍ
– گرین، کیت و لیپهان، جیل. (1383). درس¬نامة نظریه و نقد ادبی، ترجمة گروه مترجمان، تهران: روزنگار.
– مارتین، والاس. (1382). نظریّه¬های روایت، ترجمة محمّد شهبا، تهران: هرمس.
– محمّدتقی سپهر. (1377). ناسخ التّواریخ قاجاریّه، به اهتمام جمشید کیانفر، تهران: انتشارات اساطیر.
– مدّبری، محمود و نجمه حسینی سروری. (1387). « از تاریخ روایی تا روایت داستانی»، پژوهش¬نامة زبان و ادب فارسی، شمارة 2، صص 28 – 1.
_ مصاحب، غلامحسین. (1381). دایرة المعارف فارسی، جلد دوم، تهران: چاپخانۀ سپهر، چاپ سوم.
