The comparative study of teacher vs. peer scaffolding on improving Iranian EFL learners’ speaking skill
Subject Areas : Curriculum Design and Development
Saeed Sayyad Chamani
1
(
Safir Language Academy, Tehran, Iran
)
Keywords: Peer Scaffolding, Teacher Scaffolding, Iranian EFL Learners, Speaking Skill,
Abstract :
This study investigated the impact of teacher and peer scaffolding on the speaking performance of Iranian EFL learners. Utilizing a quasi-experimental design, 60 intermediate-level female learners were selected from a population of 75, divided into three groups: teacher scaffolding, peer scaffolding, and a control group. The study employed the Preliminary English Test (PET) and speaking pretest and posttest to ensure homogeneity and measure the participants’ progress in speaking proficiency. The results of a One-way ANOVA indicated significant improvements in speaking performance for both scaffolding groups compared to the control group. However, no significant difference was found between the effects of teacher and peer scaffolding. These findings suggest that both types of scaffolding are equally effective in enhancing L2 speaking skills, supporting the theoretical framework of Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD). The study underscores the importance of incorporating scaffolding into language instruction to foster better speaking outcomes.
Ahmadi Safa, M., & Rozati, F. (2016). The impact of scaffolding and non-scaffolding strategies on the EFL learners' listening comprehension development. The Journal of Educational Research, 0(0), 1–10.
Amiri Samani, E., & Khazayie, S. (2017). Scaffolding low-intermediate adult EFL learners to write. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(2), 216-230.
Boonkit, K. (2010). Enhancing the development of speaking skills for non-native speakers of English. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 4(2) 1305–1309.
Byram, M., & Wagner, M. (2018). Making a difference: Language teaching for intercultural and international dialogue. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 140-151.
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2019). Putting accent in its place: Rethinking obstacles to communication. Language Teaching, 52(3), 376-390.
Fakher Ajabshir, Z., & Panahifar, F. (2020). The effect of teachers' scaffolding and peers' collaborative dialogue on speech act production in symmetrical and asymmetrical groups. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 8(1), 45-61
Galloway, N., & Rose, H. (2018). Incorporating Global Englishes into the ELT classroom. ELT Journal, 72(1), 3-14.
Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Goh, C. C. M., & Burns, A. (2012). Teaching speaking: A holistic approach. Cambridge University Press.
Harraqi, M. (2017). Review of Aida Walqui’s scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework. American Journal of Arts and Design, 2(3), 84-88.
Jones, M., & Carter, C. (2019). Peer scaffolding in language learning: Effects on speaking and writing. Language Learning Journal, 47(2), 123-135.
Khajeh Khosravi, S. (2017). The effect of symmetrical scaffolding on the reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Psychological and Brain Sciences, 2(4), 95-99.
Khodamoradi, A. (2012). The effect of mechanical and meaningful drills on the acquisition of comparative and superlative adjectives. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(4), 264-274.
Khodamoradi, A., Iravani, H., Jafarigohar, M., & Amerian, M. (2013). Teacher’s scaffolding vs. peers’ collaborative dialogue: Implementing an innovation in the sociocultural context of Iranian universities. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 14(9), 1212-1220. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.14.9.814
Kozulin, A. (2018). Vygotsky’s theory in the context of other approaches to psychology. Educational Psychologist, 53(2), 111-124.
Lacey, M. M., Campbell, S. G., Shaw, H., & Smith D. P. (2020). Self-selecting peer groups formed within the laboratory environment have a lasting effect on individual student attainment and working practices. FEBS Open Bio.10(7):1194-1209. https://doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.12902
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2018). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education: Vygotskian praxis and the research/practice divide. Routledge.
Li, M., & Li, J. (2017). The impact of peer scaffolding on language learner performance. Applied Linguistics, 38(4), 465-488.
Li, J., & Wang, Y. (2020). Technology and second language speaking skills. Routledge.
Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McDonough, K. (2004). Learner-learner interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context. System, 32(2), 207-224.
Millgram, Y., Nock, M. K., Bailey, D. D., & Goldenberg, A. (2023). Knowledge about the source of emotion predicts emotion-regulation attempts, strategies, and perceived emotion-regulation success. Psychological Science, 34(11), 1244-1255. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976231199440
Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (2004). Second language learning theories (2nd ed.). London: Arnold.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ohta, A. S. (2001). Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rahnama, M., Fatehi Rad, N., & Bagheri, H. (2016). Developing EFL learners’ speaking ability,
Razmjoo, S, A & Ghasemi, S. (2016). A model of speaking strategies for EFL learners. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS) 3(3), 114-143.
Rezaei, M., & Shokrpour, N. (2011). Teacher vs. peer scaffolding modes in L2 writing classes: A consideration of genre approach to writing. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(2), 40-64.
Shumin, K. (2002). Factors to consider: Developing adult EFL students' speaking abilities. In C. Richards, & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching (pp. 204-211). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Steiner, F., Fernandez, N., Dietziker, J., Stämpfli, P., Seifritz, E., Rey, A., & Frühholz, S. (2022). Affective speech modulates a cortico-limbic network in real-time. Program of Neurobiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2022.102278.
Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52, 119–158.
Taguchi, N. (2019). Second language acquisition in multilingual and mixed ability Indian classrooms. Multilingual Matters.
Thomson, R. I. (2018). Measurement of accentedness, intelligibility, and comprehensibility. The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, 2, 461-478.
Ur, P. (2006). Correctness and correction. Retrieved on April, 17m 2016 from: www.univie.ac.at/FDZnglisch/files/correctness-correction.pdf
Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2019). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 31(3), 927-959.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky.” Volume 1. Thinking and Speaking. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 17 (2), 89-100.
Zhang, Y., & Thomas, M. (2018). Teacher scaffolding in language acquisition: Recent findings and implications. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(4), 695-706.
Zheng, L. (2016). The effectiveness of self-regulated learning scaffolds on academic performance in computer-based learning environments: a meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Educ, 17(22), 187–202.
