Assessment tolerance root and shoot protein and prolin, under application the lead, in two varieties of Canola (Brassica napus L.)
Subject Areas : New Finding in Agriculture
1 - Member of Young Research club, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran
2 - Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz Branch, Iran
Keywords: Canola, Lead, Molecular Tolerance, Morphological,
Abstract :
Defense mechanism for review of rapeseed in different concentrations of lead versus lead (0, 100, 200 and 400 mol) of cellular factors such as protein and proline in roots and shoots of canola were measured. The project laboratory and in hydroponic culture method was performed using Hoagland. Root length by ruler and protein and proline content in root and shoot spectrophotometer apparatus (uv) Hitachi Model 200 was measured. The results of this study, lead concentrations in the nutrient solution decreased both root length of canola varieties and according to the mean value of root length lead in the cultivar R.G.S.003 was higher tolerance to Hybrid Hyola 401. With increasing lead concentration in nutrient solution root protein and proline in two cultivars to control and the amount of protein increased with increasing lead concentration in nutrient solution decreased shoot in hybrid Hyola 401.but R.G.S.003 increases. Samples analysis by software Spss and charting using 2003 Excel software was done.
1- Ajam, Sh. 2005. Effect of planting date and nitrogen fertilizer levels on yield of canola variety Hyola401 in Khuzestan. M.Sc. Thesis of Agriculture. Islamic Azad University. Science and Research Khuzestan Branch.
2- Akhondi, M. 2006. Effect of Drought stress on Prolin and elements on alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Journal. Plant and breeding. Vol 4: 115-130.
3- Azizi, M., Soltani, A. and Khavari, S. 1999. Canola, physiology, race, biological technology (translated in persian). First Edition. University of Mashhad Press. 419 Pp
4- Bates, L., Waldern, S. and Treare, R. 2003. Rapid determination of free prolin for water stress studies. Plant and soil. 39:205-207.
5- Erick, M. and Peatk, J. 1999. Kinetics of lead absorption/desorption on goethite:residence time effect, Soil Sci. 164:28-39
6- Hu, S., Lau, K. w. k. and Wu, M. 2001. Cadmium sequestration in Chlamydomonas Reinhardt. Plant Science. 161. 987-996
7- Khayat, M., Rahnama, A. A., Lorzadeh, S. and Lack, S. 2007. Curve of growth, yield and yield components of rapeseed promising genotypes on different sowing conditions Khuzestan (Ahwaz). Msc. Thesis of Agriculture. Islamic Azad University. Science and Research Khuzestan Branch
8- Lowary, O., Rosebrough, H. and Far, N. J. 1999. Protein measurement with the pholin phenol reagent. Journal. Biology. Chemical. 193:256-275
9- Piechalak, A., Tomaszewska, B., Baralkiewicz, A. and Maleckaa, D. 2002. Accumulation and detoxification of lead ions in legumes. Phytochemistry. 60: 153-162.
10- Qorbanli, M. L. 2005. Assessment tolerance and root and shoot protein and prolin, under application the lead, canola varieties. J. Plant and ecosystem. 1(2): 56-67
11- Shariati, Sh. 2000. Rapeseed. First Edition. Department Budget Planning Ministry of Agriculture Press. 125 Pp.
12- Siripornadulsil, S. and Traina, M. 2002. Molecular Mechanisms of praline- Mediated Tolerance to Toxic Heavy Metals in Transgenic Microalgae. The Plant Cell. 14:2837-2847.
13- Verma, D. P. S. 1999. Osmotic stress tolerance in plant: Role of prolin and sulfur metabolism. In Molecular Responses to cold Drought, Heat and Salt Stress in Higher Plant , K. Shinozaki and K. Yamaguchi- shinozaki, eds, pp.153-168
14- Wierzbicka, M. 2006. Lead translocation and location Allium cepa roots. Candian. Journal. Botany. 65:1851- 1860
15- Wilkins, D. A. 2000. A technique for the measurement of lead tolerance in plants. Nature 180, 37-38.
