Assessment of the adaptability of 50 Russian grapevine varieties in Iran by Genotype & genotype × environment interaction Biplot (GGE Biplot) method

Subject Areas : Journal of Plant Ecophysiology

valiollah rasoli ¹ , Hame Dolati Baneh ²

1 - Head of Grapevine Research Station
2 - scientific board, Ormia agricultural and natural resources research center

Received: 2015-12-09 Accepted : 2016-04-14 Published : 2017-11-22

Keywords: grapevine, Environmental assessment, cultivar introducing, genotype environment Interaction,

Abstract :

This study was carried out to adaptability evaluation of the 50 grapevine varieties introduced from Russia from 2008 to 2013 in the Qazvin and Urmia provinces. The experimental design was randomized complete block design with three replications. Three superior grapevine clones of white Bidaneh were as control in both areas. The Corden bilateral training system was used in 2×3.5 m space planning and two vines in each experimental unit in the both areas. Recorded traits were: yield per plant, length and width of berry, total soluble solids of juice (TSS), juice pH, juice titratable acid (TA) and time of harvest. Combined analysis of variance and adaptability analysis was performed on the base of GGE Biplot principal components analysis of the environment scaling method. Statistical analysis was done by GenStat ver.12 computer software. The effects of the environments, varieties and environments × varieties were significant in the combined analysis of variance. The adaptability of Zenbil 13-366 and Ljana was higher than other varieties on the base of yield components in Qazvin. Ruski Ramphi had higher adaptability than other varieties in Urmia region. Yoski biser, Bobili magaracha and Ramphi Izdangareh had the most inappropriate situation on the base of yield components in two areas.

References:

رسولی، و. ا. دولتی بانه، ح. 1391. ارزیابی اولیه ارقام انگور  روسی در ایران. گزارش نهایی 41515،  مورخ 5/7/91 سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی.
فرشادفر، ع ا. 1389. مباحث نوین در ژنتیک بیومتری. جلد دوم. انتشارات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد کرمانشاه. 1630 صفحه.  
سیروس عبدمیشانی، علی‌اکبر شاه نجات بوشهری. 1387. اصلاح نباتات تکمیلی جلد اول اصلاح نباتات متداول. چاپ دوم. انتشارات دانشگاه تهران. 276 صفحه.
رسولی، و. ا. 1382. معرفی ایستگاه تحقیقات انگور تاکستان. پژوهش نامه کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی. انتشارات مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی قزوین. ص 102.
دولتی بانه، ح. 1387. معرفی ایستگاه تحقیقات کهریز ارومیه. انتشارات مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ارومیه.
تفضلی، ع. ا. حکمتی، ج. فیروزه، پ. 1373. انگور. انتشارات دانشگاه شیراز.343 صفحه.
جلیلی مرندی، ر. 1386. بررسی تاثیر تنش خشکی بر میزان کلروفیل و قندهای محلول در انگور. نشریه دانشگاه ارومیه، ص 57-51.
Hardie, W. J.  2008. Grapevine biology and adaptation to viticulture. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 6(2): 74–81.
Pallas, B.,   Loi, C.,   Christophe, A.,   Cournède, P. H.,   Lecoeur, J. 2009.  A Stochastic Growth Model of Grapevine with Full Interaction between Environment, Trophic Competition and Plant Development. Third International Symposium on Plant Development. Paris, France. 
Zhang, Z. w., Zhang, B., Tong, H., Fang L. 2010. Photosynthetic LCP and LSP of Different Grapevine Cultivars. J. Northwest Univ. 01-008.
Watlington F.  1994. A new tropical grape cultivar: 'Valplatinta'. Fruit-Varieties-Journal., 48(4): 228-229
Lisek, J. 2008. Climatic factors affecting development and yielding of grapevine in central Poland. J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res. 16: 285-293.
Yan, W., Kang, M.S. 2003. GGE biplot analysis. CRC Press. New York.
Sivčev, B., Petrović, N., Ranković-Vasić, Z., Radovanović, D., Vuković, A., Vujadinović, M. 2011. Effect of the genotype – environmental interaction on phenotype variation of the bunch weight in white wine varieties. Arch. Biol. Sci. Belgrade. 63(2): 365-370.
Serra, I., Strever, A., Myburgh, P. and Deloire, A. 2013. Review: the interaction between rootstocks and cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.) to enhance drought tolerance in grapevine. Austr. J. Grape Wine Res. 10: 111-120.
Koundouras, S., Tsialtas, I., Zioziou, E. and Nikolaou, N. 2008. Rootstock effects on the adaptive strategies of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon) under contrasting water status: Leaf physiological and structural responses. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 128: 86-96.
Cooley, N. 2012. Environment - genotype interactions and the physiological processes determining fruitfulness and yield in grapevines. Final Report to Grape and Wine Research & Development Corporation. University of Melbourne. Project Number: MU 08/02.
Rasoli, V., Farshadfar, E., Ahmadi, J. 2015. Evaluation of Genotype × Environment Interaction of Grapevine Genotypes (Vitis vinifera L.) By Non Parametric Method. J. Agr. Sci. Tech. 17(5): 1279-1289.