Comparative comparison of Article 174 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran with the International Ombudsman

Subject Areas : فصلنامه مطالعات میان رشته ای فقه

Yasaman Saeidi ¹ ( Tehran iran )

Received: 2023-03-21 Accepted : 2023-05-28 Published : 2023-09-23

Keywords: Supervision, Ombudsman, General Inspection Organization, non-judicial authority, postponement of proceedings,

Abstract :

The Ombudsman is a non-judicial grievance authority and a modern monitoring mechanism on the proper functioning of administrative and government organizations, which aims to develop democracy with the help of the powers and legal frameworks that are provided for this authority in each country to deal quickly and informally with The reports and complaints of individuals are related to any actions or omissions outside the regulations or inappropriate behaviors that occurred as a result of mismanagement in administrative and government organizations. In Iran, there is no institution called Ombudsman, but we can refer to its similar institution, the "National Inspection Organization", which has become a permanent member of the International Ombudsman Institute. The purpose of the current research, which is written in a descriptive-comparative way, is to scientifically examine the position of the Ombudsman in Iran in order to reduce the problems of judicial proceedings, which lead to the delay of proceedings and the obstacles that dominate the country's administrative system. The findings indicate that; The General Inspection Organization of the country, under the supervision of the judiciary, supervises and inspects in order to better implement the law and correct the existing process in the wrongful organizations, and it only has the task of following up and informing the decision-making bodies provided for in the law, but the supervision in The ombudsman institution is independent and discretionary social values of the country, because one of the basic pillars of a system is the expansion of justice and people. Leadership is whistle-blowing in discovering corruption and administrative violations, improving the level of performance and appropriate behavior of agents, discovering and rooting problems and providing corrective solutions that will be possible with continuous and powerful monitoring and inspection.