A comparative study of Iran's nuclear activities from the point of view of the jurisprudence of Nafi Sabil and international law
Subject Areas : فصلنامه مطالعات میان رشته ای فقهgoudarz beyrami 1 , atefeh amininia 2 , soudeh shamlou 3
1 - PhD student and lecturer at Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch
2 - Faculty member of Islamic Azad University - Tehran Center
3 - Faculty member of Islamic Azad University - Tehran Center
Keywords: International law, Nuclear Energy, rule of negation, peaceful activities, Iran', s nuclear activities,
Abstract :
With the discovery of the atom and the increasing development of nuclear energy, extensive efforts were made at the level of the international community for the peaceful use of nuclear energy.The collection of these efforts led to the formation of a set of documents, treaties, customary rules and procedures for governments to regulate their nuclear activities within its framework. Today, the use of nuclear energy is an important issue in the world community, and the international law of nuclear activities considers and approves the achievement of peaceful atomic technology as a part of national sovereignty.In this context, Iran's nuclear activity is not separate from this issue, so that in recent decades, the country's nuclear activities have been the focus of the international community. The present article, with descriptive and analytical method, aims to answer the question, why peaceful nuclear activities Is Iran allowed?The results of this research show that Iran's nuclear activities under the protection of the holy Sharia and the principle of sanctity in not using nuclear weapons and in the light of the jurisprudence rule of the Nafisabil rule are only for peaceful purposes and to avoid non-Muslim domination over Muslims. Iran has always proven that it does not use its nuclear activities for peaceful purposes in accordance with international law.
_||_