Secularization and Desecularization in Theory of International Relations

Subject Areas : International Relations

Mojtaba  Abdkhodaei ¹ (International Relations, faculty of political science and law, Allameh Tabataba'i University)

Received: 2019-06-18 Accepted : 2019-06-18 Published : 2019-05-22

Keywords: secularism, Theorizing, International Politics, Key words: International Relations,

Abstract :

Over the past few decades, critical theories in international politics, believing that the analytical deficiencies of this field are rooted in the analytic constraints of the prevailing current, criticized positivist (rational), rational, materialist, and domineering and steadfast attitudes toward the flow of ideas and emphasized the need for transformation in The world of Western-oriented attitudes has emphasized international relations theories and have emboldened post-truthful, reflective, imaginative, and emancipatory attitudes, and the source of analytic inability has returned many of the ideas to the above-mentioned factors. However, they are less concerned with the root and origins of the dimensions of these challenging factors in what the fundamental foundations are, and what is its relation to the secularization process of this science? This paper, with the idea that the materialist view of international relations, which is the legacy of the authoritarian rule of secularism in this field, is one of the factors contributing to the emergence of analytical challenges of existing international relations theories, attempts to draw the share of secularism in the emergence of these deficiencies and Demonstrates how the process of secularization of international relations science has redefined the opportunity for a free thinker to analyze objective facts from theories of this science, and the origin of what critical theories take over the dominant microcosm is rooted in the secularization process of this trend. He also states that his critical currents have not been immune from the pest because of adherence to secularism.

References:

منابع:

-      اسنایدر، جک (1393)،دین و نظریه روابط بین الملل، سیدعبدالعلی قوام ، رحمت حاجی مینه ، تهران، علم

-      آکاریا، آمیتاو و بری بوزان (1389) نظریه غیرغربی روابط بین‌الملل، دیدگاه‌هائی در­باره آسیا و فراسوی آن، علیرضا طیب، تهران، انتشارات موسسه فرهنگی مطالعات و تحقیقات بین‌المللی ابرار معاصر تهران.

-      پالمر، ریچارد (1377) علم هرمنوتیک، محمد سعید حنایی کاشانی، تهران، هرمس.

-      جمعی از نویسندگان با نظارت علمی محمد تقی سبحانی(1390)، آئین عرفی جستارهایی انتقادی در بنیادهای سکولاریسم، قم، پژوهشگاه علوم و فرهنگ اسلامی

-      جمعی از نویسندگان، بی نا (1393)، سکولاریسم از ظهور تا سقوط، سید رحیم راستی تبار و دیگران، قم، پژوهشگاه علوم و فرهنگ اسلامی

-      گریفیتس، مارتین(1391)، نظریه روابط بین الملل برای سده بیست و یکم ، علیرضا طیب، تهران، نشر نی.

-      لیتل، ریچارد (1389) تحول در نظریه‌‌های موازنه قوا، غلامعلی چگنی‌زاده، تهران، موسسه فرهنگی مطالعات و تحقیقات بین‌المللی ابرار معاصر تهران.

-      لینکلیتر، اندرو(1385)، چالش علم و سنت، بهرام مستقیمی، تهران، دفتر مطالعات سیاسی و بین‌المللی. 

-      ونت، الکساندر (1384) نظریه اجتماعی سیاست بین‌الملل، حمیرا مشیرزاده، تهران، دفتر مطالعات سیاسی و بین‌المللی.

-      Acharya, Amitav & Barry Buzan(ed) (2010) Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia. New York. Rutledge.

-      Armstrong, H. F. (1956) “Neutrality: Varying Tunes”. Foreign Affairs. (1956–7). 35.

-      Barbour, Ian (2000) When Science Meets Religion. London. SPCk.

-      Berger, Peter L (1996). “Secularism in Retreat”, The National Interest , No. 46 (Winter 1996/97), pp. 3-12 

-      Berger,Peter L.(1967),The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion,Garden City, NY:Doubleday

-      Berger,Peter, ed.(1999), The Desecularization of the World: Resurgent Religion and World Politics, Grand Rapids,WI: Wm. B. Eerdmans/Ethics and Public Policy Center.

-      Buzan, Barry & Little, Richard (2000) International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations. Oxford. Oxford University Press.

-      Carr, Edward Hallett (1946) The Twenty Years' Crisis. London. Macmillan.

-      Cox, Robert  (1986) “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory”. in Robert Keohane (ed.). Neorealism and its Critics. New York. Columbia University Press.

-      Cox, Robert W. (1997) The New Realism: Perspectives on Multilateralism and World Order. New York. United Nations University.

-      Dilthey, Wilhelm (1961) Pattern and Meaning in History. New York. Harper and Brothers.

-      Elman, Colin and Miriam Fendius Elman, ed. Progress in international relations theory: Appraising the field, (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.2003)

-      Juergensmeyer Mark (1993), The New Cold War: Religious Nationalism Confronts the Secular State ,Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

-      Kubalkova, V. 2000. "Towards an International Political Theology" Milennium: Journal of International Studies 29 (3): 675-704.

-      Lapid, Yosef (1989) “The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-positivist Era”. International Studies Quarterly. 33. September.

-      Mitchell, J. 2008. "A Reply to My Critics: '' Journal of Politics 70 (3):880-883.

-      Pettman, R (2004)  Reason, Culture, Religion: The Metaphysics of World Politics. New York. Palgrave Macmillan.

-      Rush, Fred (2005) Critical Theory. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.

-      Schweller. R. L.. and W. C. Wohlforth 2000. "Power Test: Evaluating Realism in Response to the End of the Cold War. " security Studies 9 (3 ): 60-107.

-      Scott, Len (2012) “Should We Stop Studying the Cuban Missile Crisis?”. International Relations. 2012. 26.

-      ShakmanHurd, Elizabeth (2008) The Politics of Secularism in International Relations. Princeton. Princeton University Press.

-      Smith, Steve (2000) “The discipline of international relations: still an American social science?”. British Journal of Politics and International Relations. Vol. 2. No. 3. October.

-      Snyder, Jack L.(ed),( 2011) , Religion and International Relations Theory, New York, Columbia University Press.

-      Stark ,Rodney ,(1999) "Secularization, R.I.P." Sociology of Religion, Vol. 60, No. 3 (Autumn, 1999), pp. 249-273

-      Tamimi Azzam,‎John L. Esposito (2000),Islam and Secularism in the Middle East, C. Hurst & Co. Publishers.

-      viotti Paul R.. Mark V. Kauppi , International Relations Theory, (Longman, Pearson. fourth Edition,  2010)

-      Wæver, Ole (1998) “The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations”. International Organization. 1998. vol. 52. no. 4.

-      Waterhouse, Eric, “Secularism,” in James Hastings (1921) The Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, vol. 11, p. 348.

-      Wilson, Edward O (1975) Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge. Harvard University Press.