Comparative Analysis on properties of Induction and Experience in Ibn Sina and Popper’s Philosophies

Subject Areas : Epistemological researches

Qodrat allah  Qorbani ¹ (Associate professor at Kharazmi university, Tehran, Iran)

Received: 2016-12-28 Accepted : 2017-03-13 Published : 2017-03-21

Keywords: induction, experiment, accidental rule, principle of transition, hidden syllogism, falsification,

Abstract :

Experience and induction are of the basic issues of contemporary philosophy of science that have been considered by Ibn Sina and Popper’s philosophies. Ibn Sina by referring to some principles including essential derivation, the accidental rule and the hidden syllogism, tries to separate experience from induction, and consider for experience a kind of conditioned certainty and universality. Moreover, his division of induction into complete and incomplete ones has its specific significance. Popper, by considering the problem of impossibility to obtain universal inferences through induction, tries to resolve the problem of induction by introducing the principle of transference indicating equality of logical approaching and the principality of psychology. He, then, through theory of Falsification, renders a universal and empirical criterion for testing empirical theories. Popper and Ibn Sina’s resemblance is their critical approach to the problems of experience and induction by struggling for explaining their epistemic aspects in sciences and practical human life. But finally although they both have not restricted scientific method to experience and induction, but some differences can be found among them. Popper, while, has regarded the experience as a criterion for separating science from non-science, but does not consider any authentic base for it. Ibn Sina, however, believes that experience is one of self evidences which played an effective role in growth of human knowledge. In this paper, by comparative explaining and analyzing Ibn Sina and Popper’s viewpoints concerning induction and experience, has been tried to show merits and efficacies of Ibn Sina’s points of view.

References:

ابن سینا. (1370). اشارات و تنبیهات، ترجمه و شرح حسن ملکشاهی، تهران: انتشارات سروش.

همو. (1373). برهان شفا، ترجمه و پژوهش مهدی قوام صفری، تهران: انتشارات فکر روز.

همو. (1387). اشارات و تنبیهات، قم: بوستان کتاب.

همو. (1428ق). الشفا، منطق قیاس، تحقیق سعید زاید، قم: انتشارات ذوی القربی.

پوپر، کارل. (1384). منطق اکتشاف علمی، ترجمه سیدحسین کمالی، تهران: انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.

همو.(1388). شناخت عینی، ترجمه احمد آرام، تهران، انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.

همو. (1379). اسطوره چارچوب در دفاع از علم و عقلانیت، ترجمه علی پایا، تهران: نشر طرح نو.

چالمرز، آلن اف. (1379). چیستی علم (درآمدی بر مکاتب علم‌شناسی فلسفی)، ترجمه سعید زیباکلام، تهران: انتشارات سمت.

حقی، علی. (1384). روش‌شناسی علوم تجربی، تهران: انتشارات سعاد.

قوام صفری، مهدی. (1380). «معرفت یقینی از دیدگاه ابن‌سینا»، فصلنامه ذهن، ش 8.

مصباح یزدی، محمدتقی. (1373). ترجمه و شرح برهان شفاء، مقدمه و نگارش محسن غرویان، تهران: انتشارات امیرکبیر.

Popper, Karl (2002) Unended Quest, London and New York, Routledge press.

Bogen, James (2002) Experiment and Observation, published in the Blackwell Guide to the philosophy of science, ed by Peter Machamer and Michael Silberstein, Blackwell publisher, USA.