IDENTIFY COMBINATION OF PREFERENCES IN TIME FOR MEASURING MULTIDIMENSIONAL POVERTY, ANFIS APPROACH
Subject Areas : Financial Economicsamir aryana 1 , محسن زاینده رودی 2 , Syed Abdul Majeed Jalai Isfandabadi 3
1 - phd student - islamic azad university
2 - استادیار گروه اقتصاد ، واحد کرمان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمان ، ایران.
3 - Head of Faculty of Management and Economics of Shahid Ba Honer Kerman University
Keywords: multidimensional poverty, adaptive fuzzy inferences system, preferences,
Abstract :
Multidimensional poverty defined as a completely definition of poverty. Multidimensional poverty based on Alkire & Foster indexses is health indicator, education indicator, standard of living indicator. Indexes in details are children education, adult education, man health, women health, children health, home flooring, sanitary facilities, shared facilities, access to safe water, assets. Preferences is the resaons of people for Decision-making can be social & personal is divided into trust, risks, altruism, positive and negative reciprocity. This research introduce the preferences in time and uses questionnaires in three stage. At first measuring multidimensional poverty in three income group. Then identify combinations of preferences in each group separetly. Adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) in MATLAB software used to examine the effects of this. The results show that different combinations in income groups, so that in low income pereferences of people are trust, altruism, reciprocity and risk, in middle income and high income the preferences are altruism,reciprocity, trust and risk.
فهرست منابع
عسکری، محمدمهدی، غفورزاده، حسین، (1393)، تحلیل مقایسه ای شاخص فقر چندبعدی در اسلام و اقتصاد متعارف، فصلنامه مطالعات اقتصاد اسلامی، 2(6)، صص53-82
سالم، علی اصغر، ابونوری، اسمعیل، یارمحمدی، جواد، (1397)، رویکرد چندبُعدی به اندازه گیری فقر؛ مفاهیم نظری و شواهد تجربی از اقتصاد ایران در طول سالهای 92-1370، فصلنامه رفاه اجتماعی، 68(18)، صص 9-41
شیروانیان، عبدالرسول، بخشوده، محمد، مهرجو، سعید، (1392)، مقایسه ی رویکرد فقر درآمدی و رویکرد چندبعدی فقر مسکن در برنامه ی حمایت از مسکن روستایی در ایران، فصلنامه تحقیقات اقتصاد کشاورزی، 19(5)، صص 81-65
فطرس، محمدحسن، قدسی، سوده، (1397)، فقر چندبعدی زنان و مردان سرپرست خانوار در مناطق شهری و روستایی ایران با استفاده از روش آلکایر و فوستر، فصلنامه رفاه اجتماعی،69(18)، صص 227-185
مهدی زاده راینی، محمد جواد، محمدی، حمید، سالار پور، ماشااله، ضیایی، سامان، (1401)، بررسی رابطه آزادی اقتصادی و رفاه اجتماعی در ایران براساس شاخص آمارتیاسن از رفاه اجتماعی، فصلنامه اقتصاد مالی، 1(16)، صص 308-281
مهینی زاده، منصور، یاوری، کاظم، جلایی، سیدعبدالمجید، جعفرزاده، بهروز، (1398)، تاثیر تغییرات ساختاری بر رفاه اقتصادی در ایران، رهیافت مدل های تعادل عمومی محاسبه پذیر، فصلنامه اقتصاد مالی، 13(48)، صص 189-167
کریمی، محمدشریف، امام وردی، قدرت اله، کریمی، مجتبی، (1393)، ارزیابی هزینه رفاهی ناشی از اثرات افزایش نرخ ارز و قیمت حامل های انرژی بر هزینه های رفاهی مصرف کننده در ایران، فصلنامه اقتصاد مالی، 8(26)، صص 157-133
یوسفی، علی، مهدیان، شکیبا، خلج، سکینه، (1394)، شناسایی عوامل تعیینکنندة فقر چندبعدی در مناطق روستایی ایران، فصلنامه پژوهش های روستائی، 4(6)، صص 721-699
Allardt, E. (1993). Having, Loving, Being: An Alternative to the Swedish Model of Welfare Research. In M. C. Nussbaum & A. K. Sen (Eds.), The Quality of Life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Alkire, S. (2002). Dimensions of Human Development. World Development, 30 (2),181-205
Alkire, & Foster. (2011a). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of public economics, 95(7), 476-487.
Alkire, S., & Santos, M. E. (2010). Acute multidimensional poverty: A new index for developing countries.
Anand, S., & Sen, A. (1997). Concepts of Human Development and Poverty: A multidimensional Perspective. Human Development Papers, 1-19.
Blank, R. M. (2008). Presidential Address: How to Improve Poverty Measurement in the United States. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27 (2), 233-254.
Booysen, F. (2002). An Overview and Evaluation of Composite Indices of Development. Social Indicators Research, 59 (2), 115-151.
Bourguignon, & Chakravarty. (2003). The measurement of multidimensional poverty. Journal of Economic inequality, 1(1), 25-49
Brandolini, A., & D'Alessio, G. (1998). Measuring Well-being in the Functioning Space. Mimeo. Banca d'Italia.
Cerioli, A., & Zani, S. (1990). A Fuzzy Approach To The Measurement of Poverty. In C. Dagum & M. Zenga (Eds.), Income and Wealth Distribution, Inequality and Poverty. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
Chiappero-Martinetti, E. (2000). A Multidimensional Assessment ofWell-being Based on Sens Functioning Approach. Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali , 2 , 207-239.
Comim, F. (2001, June, 5-7). Operationalizing Sen's capability approach. In The Conference on Justice and Poverty: Examining Sen's Capability Approach. Cambridge,U.K..
Cummins, R. A. (1996). The Domains of Life Satisfaction: An Attempt to Order Chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38 (3), 303-328.
Doyal, L., & Gough, I. (1991). A Theory of Human Need. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Deutsch, J., & Silber, J. (2005). Measuring Multidimensional Poverty: An Empirical Comparison of Various Approaches. Review of Income and Wealth, 51 (1), 145-174.
Doyal, L., & Gough, I. (1991). A Theory of Human Need. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Duclos, J. Y., Sahn, D. E., & Younger, S. D. (2006a). Robust Multidimensional Poverty Comparisons. The Economic Journal, 116 (514), 943-968.
T Dohmen, A Falk, K Fliessbach, U Sunde, B Weber Journal of Public Economics 95 (3- 4), 279-285
Esposito, L., & Chiappero-Martinetti, E. (2008). Multidimensional Poverty Measurement: Restricted and Unrestricted Hierarchy among Poverty Dimensions (OPHI Working Papers No. 22). Oxford, U.K.: Oxford Poverty and Human development Initiative.
Esfahani, H. S., & Pesaran, M. H. (2009). The Iranian economy in the twentieth century: A global perspective. Iranian Studies, 42(2), 177-211
Federman, M., & Garner, T. I. (1996). What Does It Mean To Be Poor in America? Monthly Labor Review, 119 (5), 3.
Gasper, D. (2002). Is Sen's Capability Approach an Adequate Basis for Considering Human Development? Review of Political Economy, 14 (4), 435 - 461.
Gillie, A. (1996). The origin of the poverty line. The Economic History Review, 49(4), 715-730.
Kangas, O., & Ritakallio, V.-M. (1998). Di_erent Methods - Di_erent Results? Approaches to Multidimensional Poverty. In H.-J. Andress (Ed.), Empirical Poverty Research in a Comparative Perspective (p. 167-203). U.K.: Ashgate.
Klemisch-Ahlert, M. (1993). Freedom of Choice. Social Choice and Welfare, 10 (3), 189-207.
Klassen, S. (2000). Measuring Poverty and Deprivation in South Africa. Review of Income and Wealth, 46 (1), 33-58.
Lelli, S. (2001). Factor Analysis vs. Fuzzy Sets Theory: Assessing the Inuence of Di_erent Techniques on Sens Functioning Approach (Discussion Paper). Center of Economic Studies , K. U. Leuven.
Max-Neef, M. A. (1993). Human Scale Development: Conception, Application and Further Reections. New York, NY: The Apex Press.
Narayan, D., Patel, R., Scha_t, K., Rademacher, A., & Koch-Schulte, S. (2000). Can Anyone Hear Us?: Voces from 47 Countries (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Orshansky, M. (1965). Counting the Poor: Another Look at the Poverty Pro_le. Social Security Bulletin, 28 (1), 3-29.
Rawls, J. (1999). The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ravallion, M. (2011). On multidimensional indices of poverty. The Journal of Economic Inequality,9(2), 235-248.
Ringen, S. (1995). Well-being, Measurement, and Preferences. Acta Sociologica, 38 (1), 3-15.
Robeyns, I. (2005a, 28 January). The Capability Approach and Welfare Policies. In The Conference on Gender Auditing and Gender Budgeting. Bologna, Italy.
Saith, R. (2001). Capabilities: the Concept and Its Operationalisation (Working Papers No. 66). Oxford, UK: Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
Sen, A. K. (1979). Issues in the Measurement of Poverty. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 81 (2), 285-307
Sen. (1976). Poverty: an ordinal approach to measurement. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 219-231.
Sen, A. K. (1985). Commodities and Capabilities (Vol. 7). New York, NY: Elsevier Science.
Sen, A. K. (1992). Inequality Re-examined. Cambridge, NY: Harvard University Press.
Sumner, A. (2007). Meaning versus measurement: why do ‘economic’indicators of poverty Still predominate? Development in Practice, 17(1), 4-13.
Spicker, P. (1990). Charles Booth: The examination of poverty. Social Policy & Administration, 24(1), 21-38.
Thorbecke, E. (2007). Multidimensional Poverty: Conceptual and Measurement Issues. In N. Kakwani & J. Silber (Eds.), The Many Dimensions of Poverty (chap. 1). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tsui, K. (2002). Multidimensional Poverty Indices. Social Choice and Welfare, 19 (1), 69-93.
Vollmer, F. (2010). Reviewing'poverty'as an object of study: Seeking a conceptual match of wellbeing with the inter-subjective understanding of ill-being. Spire Journal of Law, Politics and Societies, 5(2), 67-85.
Watts, H. (1968). An Economic De_nition of Poverty. In D. P.Moynihan (Ed.), On Understanding Poverty (p. 316-29). New York, NY: Basic Books.
Wagle, U. (2008b). Multidimensional Poverty Measurement : Concepts and Applications. New York, NY: Springer.
Wagle, U. (2009). Capability Deprivation and Income Poverty in the United States, 1994 and 2004: Measurement Outcomes and Demographic Pro_les. Social Indicators Research, 94 (3), 509-533.
Whelan, B. J. (1993). Non-monetary Indicators of Poverty. In J. Berghman & B. Cantillon (Eds.), The European Face of Social Security : Essays in Honour of Hermann Deleeck. Brook_eld,
