The role of concise knowledge in determining the actuality of rulings from the perspective of Akhund Khorasani and Imam Khomeini

Subject Areas : Nameh Elahiyat

Khadijah  Ahmadi Bighash ¹ (PhD in Comparative Interpretation.)

Received: 2021-10-20 Accepted : 2021-10-20 Published : 2021-02-19

Keywords: Imam Khomeini,  Concise knowledge, the necessity of definite agreement, the sanctity of definite opposition, Khorasani cleric,

Abstract :

In the science of principles, science is divided into two categories of details and conciseness. These two sciences help the mujtahid and the jurist in expressing and discovering the religious rules. Detailed science means that the principle of the task is clear, but concise science means comprehensive knowledge with doubt in its place of establishment. So, there is a consensus that this science is as comprehensive as its homework, but the task of concise science is more controversial than more comprehensive. Now the question is what are the effects of the necessity of definite agreement or the sanctity of definite opposition in general science, from the point of view of Akhund Khorasani and Imam Khomeini in expressing the rulings. A descriptive-analytical study of this issue shows that Akhund Khorasani (RA) in general science, my act is in all respects, so his definite opposition is forbidden, and his definite agreement is obligatory. But if the concise knowledge of Lamen's actuality had all aspects, the concise knowledge in both positions includes task-making. Imam Khomeini (ra), unlike the late mullah (ra), believes that with the existence of concise knowledge in the necessity of definite agreement, definite opposition is forbidden and a possible agreement is sufficient. That is, there is no need to leave everyone around the issue. This makes it not permissible to commit an ugly act in the event of a conflict with a stronger corruptor.