Sustainability Test of Iran’s Agricultural Balance Trade
Subject Areas : Environmental policy and managementMohsen Salehi Komroudi 1 , Esmaeil Pishbahar 2 , Hossein Raheli 3
1 - PhD Student in Agriculture Economics, Agriculture Faculty, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran
2 - Assistance Professor in Agriculture Economics, Agriculture Economics Department, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran
3 - Associate Professor in Agriculture Economics, Agriculture Economics Department, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran
Keywords: agricultural sector, Sustainability, Arize Model, Balance Trade, Husted Model,
Abstract :
From the perspective of new growth models and new international trade theories, both exports and imports play an important role in a dynamic economy. Economically, we cannot merely emphasize on a positive trade balance and we ignore the benefits of imports, and also we cannot advise negative trade balance. But the main concern of policy makers about international trade should be making stability and equilibrium of trade balance in the long run. Especially, deficit agricultural trade balance can be a great danger for food security. Hence, the main objective of this study was to test the sustainability of Iran's agricultural trade balance during the period 1961-2011 (1340-1390). For this purpose, After confirming the existence of cointegration by Gregory-Hansen Test, Hasted and Arize models was estimated with OLS, FMOLS and DOLS methods and it released we can verify sustainability of agricultural trade balance during the period of the study. Also, the estimation of error correction model showed that there is a bidirectional causality relationship between import and export in long-run while in short-run export only cause import in agriculture sector.
1- Andrews, D., & Zivot, E. (1992). Further evidence on the Great Crash, the oil price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10, 251-70. | ||||
2- Arize, C.A. (2002). Imports and exports in 50 countries: test of cointegration and structural breaks. International Review of Economics and Finance, (11), 101-115. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
3- Bakhtiari, S., & Haghghi, Z. (2003). The study of food security and human development in Islamic countries. Agricultural Economics and development, 11(43 & 44), 21-51. (In Farsi) | ||||
4- Emmy, F.A., Baharom, A.H., Radam, A., & Illisriyani, I. (2009). Export and Import Cointegration in Forestry Domain: The Case of Malaysia. Munich Personal Repec Archive, 4. | ||||
5- FAO. (2012). Website FAO, Available at: http://faostat.fao.org. | ||||
6- Gorji, E., & Alipourian, M. (2006). The study of trade liberalization on Iranian economic growth (and other OPEC countries). Iranian Journal of trade studies, (40), 187-204. (In Farsi) | ||||
7- Gregory, A.W., & Hansen, B.E. (1996 a). Residual-Based Tests for Cointegration in Models with Regime Shifts. Journal of Econometrics, 70(1), 99-126. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
8- Gregory, A.W., & Hansen, B.E. (1996 b). Tests for Cointegration in Models with Regime and Trend Shifts. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 58 (3), 555-60. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
9- Hansen, B.E. (1992). Efficient estimation and testing of cointegrating vectors in the presence of deterministic trends, Journal of Econometrics, 53(1), 87-121. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
10- Hossain, M.A., Haseen, L., & Jabin, N. (2009), Dynamics and Causality among Exports and Income in Bangladesh. The Bangladesh Development Studies,(2). | ||||
11- Husted, S. (1992). The emerging U. S. Current Account deficit in 1980: cointegration analysis. The Review of Economics and Statistics, (74), 159-166. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
12- Karahasan, B.k. (2009). Causal Links between Trade and Economic Growth Evidence from Turkey and European Union Countries. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. 29809. | ||||
13- Lee, C.H., & Huang, B-N. (2002). The Relationship between Exports and Economic Growth in East Asian Countries: a Multivariate Threshold Autoregressive Approach. Journal of Economic Development, 27(2). | ||||
14- Levin, A., & Raut, L.K. (1997). Complementarities between Exports and Human Capital in Economic Growth: Evidence from the Semi-industrialized Countries. Economic Development and Cultural Change, (44), 155-174. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
15- Malakian, N., & Khatami, S. (2011). The examination of economic convergence of MENA countries (1980-2008). Journal of Economic Research, 11(3), 135-157. (In Farsi) | ||||
16- Memon, M., Hussain. B., Waqar, S., & Ali, M. (2008). Causal Relationship between Exports and Agricultural GDP in Pakistan. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 11845. | ||||
17- Phillips, P.C. (1987). Time series regression with a unit root. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 277-301 [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
18- Samadi, A.H., Haghighat, A., & Aminzadeh, K. (2006). Inflation and structural failure; the experimental evidences from Iran's economy. Journal of Economic Research, 8(27), 65-87. (In Farsi) | ||||
19- Stock, J.H., & Watson, M.W. (1993). A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 783-820. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
20- Tayebi, K., Emadzadeh, M., & Sheykhbahaei, A.(2008). The effects of manufacture export and human capital on total factor productivity and economic growth in OIC countries. Journal of Quantitative Economics, 5(2), 85-106. (In Farsi) | ||||
21- Uddin, J. (2009). Time Series Behavior of Imports and Exports of Bangladesh: Evidence from Cointegration Analysis and Error Correction Model, International Journal of Economics and Finance, 1(2). [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
22- Ullah, S., Zaman, E., Farooq, M., & Javid, A. (2009). Cointegration and Causality between Exports and Economic Growth in Pakistan. European Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2). |