Explain the effect of experimental environmental qualities on the spatial configuration of gardencity Case study: Mehrshahr gardencity

Subject Areas : Architecture and urbanization

azin ataei, ¹ , Jamaleddin Soheili ² , maryam armaghan ³ , Ali Akbar Heidari, ⁴

1 - Ph.D Researcher in Architecture, Department of Architecture, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
2 - Associate Professor, Department of Architecture, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
3 - Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
4 - Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran.

Received: 2022-06-21 Accepted : 2022-11-10 Published : 2024-02-20

Keywords: Environmental quality, Spatial Configuration, Environmental Quality Experience, Garden City,

Abstract :

Introduction: Urban development and urbanization needs have made it necessary to pay attention to the welfare demands of individuals. The importance of responding to the improvement of the quality of the environment in order to ensure the satisfaction of citizens, while physical efficiency, shows the need to consider the experimental qualities of the environment in the process of spatial arrangement; Because exclusively materialistic estimates and one-sided functionalist approach in design, by undermining the qualitative desirability and creating an inefficient environment in meeting the needs, the lived experience of human beings has been limited.Research Aim: This research was done with the aim of explaining the effect of spatial configuration on people's qualitative perception of the environment. Assuming the existence of a relationship between environmental quality and spatial organization and trying to answer how this relationship has been done.Methodology: The present research is done by analytical-interpretive method and its methodological approach is qualitative. Those environmental quality criteria based on library studies and theoretical foundations that had the most conceptual similarity with the social logic of space were verified in two stages by Delphi technique and by location-based questionnaire in passages separated by the degree of interconnection index, extracted from The layout analysis of the survey space has been performed. The sample size was 384 residents of Mehrshahr who were selected by cluster random sampling. In order to analyze the results, the method of logical reasoning has been used.Studied Areas: The study area, phase one of Mehrshahr neighborhood in Karaj, is due to the spatial configuration of the urban garden cities model, which has been preserved relatively without structural changes since the design.Results: Based on the findings, the field characteristics of high-correlation passages, from the residents' point of view, have resulted in the most desirability in relation to the quality assessment indicators of the environment related to the physical-functional component. Low-interconnected passages had the highest satisfaction of the perceptual-aesthetic component, and finally, medium-interconnected passages provided a richer socio-cultural interaction.Conclusion: The capacity of spaces with the aim of enhancing the quality experience of the environment is not provided only by the relations and structural features of the space and generally how to use the space depends on the experimental interventions of users that will have many effects on the design process to use public spaces.

References:

اداره کل مسکن و شهرسازی کرج. (1390). بازنگری طرح تفصیلی شهر کرج.

بحرینی، سیدحسن. (1392). فرآیند طراحی شهری. تهران: انتشارات مؤسسه چاپ و نشر دانشگاه تهران.

بخارائی، صالحه. (1393). فضامندی: وجوه، حدود و عوامل تاثیر گذار. صفه، 25(2)، 18-5.

پاکزاد، جهانشاه. (1394). الفبای روان‌شناسی محیط برای طراحان. تهران: انتشارات آرمان شهر.

حیدری سورشجانی؛ رسول، دولتیاریان، کامران و شاطریان، محسن. (1402). سنجش کیفیت محیط شهری بر مبنای رضایتمندی سکونتی (مطالعه موردی: شهر نورآباد). مطالعات برنامه­ ریزی سکونتگاه­های انسانی، 18(1)، 50-37.

خداپناهی، محمدکریم و ایروانی، محمود. (1396). روان‌شناسی احساس و ادراک. تهران: انتشارات سمت.

رفیعیان، مجتبی؛ عسگری­زاده، زهرا و امین صالحی، فرزین. (1392). مقایسه تطبیقی و سنجش کیفیت محیط سکونتی نواب و اکباتان با استفاده از روش‌هایHMR و EFA. علوم و تکنولوژی محیط زیست، 16(1)، 160-247.

سازمان اسناد و کتابخانه ملی ایران. (1348). 034196-999: تهران.

سند توسعه محلات. (1396). کرج: شهرداری منطقه 4.

قاسمی، کیمیا و نوری. (1394). ارزیابی کیفیت زندگی در شهرهای جدید با استفاده از سنجش کیفیت ذهنی؛ مورد مطالعه: شهر جدید هشتگرد. فصلنامه پژوهش و برنامه ­ریزی شهری، 7(25)، 172-159.

قربان‌پور، مریم؛ صداقت‌نیا، سعید و زالی، نادر. (1402). تحلیل ارتباط بین فضای سبز شهری و آلودگی هوا با تأکید بر بوم‌گرایی شهری (موردپژوهی: شهر تهران). مطالعات برنامه ­ریزی سکونتگاه­های انسانی، 18(2)، 129-115.

کشاورز قدیمی، حسین رضا؛ طبیبیان، منوچهر و معینی­فر، مریم. (1402). فراتحلیل مهم ترین عوامل حس مکان در فضاهای عمومی و مجازی( مطالعه موردی: فضای عمومی مرکز شهر رشت). مطالعات برنامه­ ریزی سکونتگاه­های انسانی، 18(3)، 64-49.

کمالی‌پور، ‌حسام؛ معماریان، ‌غلام‌حسین؛ فیضی، ‌محسن و موسویان، ‌محمدفرید. (1391). ترکیب شکلی و پیکره بندی فضایی در مسکن بومی: مقایسه تطبیقی عرصه بندی فضای مهمان در خانه­ های سنتی کرمان. فصلنامه مسکن و محیط روستا، 138(31)، 16-3.

گلکار، کوروش. (1380). مؤلفه‌های سازنده کیفیت در طراحی شهری. نشریه صفه، 11(32)، 65-38.

میزگرد طراحی در شهرهای جدید. (1378). تهران: نشریه آبادی.

Ardestani, L., Choobchian, Sh., Sadighi, H., Azadi, H., Viira, A., Tanaskovik, V., & Kurban, A. (2022). Investigating Subjective and Objective Quality of Life in Rural Areas: the Case of Tehran Province in Iran. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 17(2), 671-702.

Bafna, S. (2003). Space syntax: A brief introduction to its logic and analytical techniques. Environment and behavior, 35(1), 17-29.

Bennedjai, R., & Bencherif, M. (2022). Local Urban Management for Improving the Quality of Life in Algerian Collective Housing Estates. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 148(2), 05022003.

Dawson, Peter C. (2002). Space syntax analysis of Central Inuit snow houses. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 21(4), 464-480.

Eiser, Ch. (2004). Children with cancer: The quality of life: Routledge.

El Din, H.S., Shalaby, A., Farouh, H.E., & Elariane, Sarah A. (2013). Principles of urban quality of life for a neighborhood. HBRC journal, 9(1), 86-92.

Estaji, H. (2014). Flexible spatial configuration in traditional houses, the case of Sabzevar. International Journal of Contemporary Architecture “The New Arch, 1(1), 26-35.

Faisal, K, & Shaker, A. (2017). Improving the accuracy of urban environmental quality assessment using geographically-weighted regression techniques. Sensors, 17(3), 528.

Gao, M., Ahern, J., & Koshland, Catherine P. (2016). Perceived built environment and health-related quality of life in four types of neighborhoods in Xi’an, China. Health & Place, 39, 110-115.

Ge, J., & Hokao, K.. (2006). Research on residential lifestyles in Japanese cities from the viewpoints of residential preference, residential choice and residential satisfaction. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78(3), 165-178.

Gesler, W. (1996). Lourdes: healing in a place of pilgrimage. Health & Place, 2(2), 95-105.

Gesler, W. (2005). Therapeutic landscapes: an evolving theme. Health and Place, 4(11), 295-297.

Gibson, JJ. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception Boston: Houghton Mifling, c1979.

Gronostajska, B.E, Tarczewski, R., & Jablonska, J. (2022). Architecture, City, People, and Structure. In (Vol. 12, pp. 277), MDPI.

Groot, L, & David, W. (2005). Research methods in architecture, translated by Alireza Eynifar. Published in Tehran University, Tehran.

Han, Ji, Liang, H., Hara, K., Uwasu, M., & Dong, L. (2018). Quality of life in China's largest city, Shanghai: A 20-year subjective and objective composite assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 173, 135-142.

Hanson, J. (2003). Decoding homes and houses: Cambridge university press.

Hayek, U.W., Efthymiou, D., Farooq, B., von Wirth, T., Teich, M., Neuenschwander, N., & Grêt-Regamey, A. (2015). Quality of urban patterns: Spatially explicit evidence for multiple scales. Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, 47-62.

Hillier, B., & Vaughan, L. (2007). The city as one thing. Progress in Planning, 67(3), 205-230.

Książek, S., Belof, M., Maleszka, W., Gmur, K., Kukuła, M., Knippschild, R., . . . Al-Alawi, S. (2022). Using Indicators to Evaluate Cultural Heritage and the Quality of Life in Small and Medium-Sized Towns: The Study of 10 Towns from the Polish-German Borderland. Sustainability, 14(3), 1322.

Lotfata, A. (2022). Walkable Access and Walking Quality of Built Environment: A Case Study of Englewood, Chicago City Metropolitan. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Futures (pp. 1-16): Springer.

Malah, A., Bahi, H., Radoine, H., Maanan, M., & Mastouri, H. (2022). Assessment of Urban Environmental Quality: a Case Study of Casablanca, Morocco. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 46, 205-210.

Skulmoski, G., Hartman, J., Francis T., & Krahn, J. (2007). The Delphi method for graduate research. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 6(1), 1-21.

Turner, A., Penn, A., & Hillier, B. (2005). An algorithmic definition of the axial map. Environment and Planning B: planning and design, 32(3), 425-444.

URL1. (2017). PPS. What makes a successful place? Retrieved from Available in http://www.pps.org

Vaughan, L. (2007). The spatial syntax of urban segregation. Progress in Planning, 67(3), 199-294.

Yamu, C., Van Nes, A., & Garau, Ch. (2021). Bill Hillier’s legacy: Space syntax—A synopsis of basic concepts, measures, and empirical application. Sustainability, 13(6), 3394.