An Analysis of the Chinese School of International Relations: Moral Realism

Subject Areas :

nozar shafiee ¹ (Associate Professor, Department of Regional Studies, University of Tehran)

Received: 2022-05-03 Accepted : 2022-07-13 Published : 2022-06-22

Keywords: International system, Chinese School of International Relations, Moral Realism, Political Leadership, Tsinghua school,

Abstract :

The purpose of this article is to review the theory of international relations from the perspective of Chinese scholars. One of the most important Chinese theories of international relations is moral realism, which originates from the Tsinghua school. The main question of this article is what is the attitude of this theory in international relations? Moral realism seeks to show why and how an emerging power such as China can replace existing hegemonic power. As one of the pioneers of moral realism, Yan Xuetong sees the cause of this issue as a quality of political leadership. Active and pioneering political leadership as an essential element of a country's political strength can, by adhering to state and global ethics, multiply a nation's comprehensive national strength (resulting from political, economic, cultural, military capability) in an emerging country, increase its international authority, and ultimately place it in the leadership position of the international order.

References:

Acharya, A. (2019). ‘From Heaven to Earth: ‘Cultural Idealism’ and ‘Moral Realism’ as Chinese Contributions to Global International Relations, The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poz014. Accessed on:12/3/2020.

Feng, Zh. (2011). ‘The Tsinghua Approach and the Inception of Chinese Theories of International Relations, The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 5(1), Pp.73– 102 https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/por015 . Accessed on:17/4/2020.

Hongxu, W. (2011). ‘The PRC’s Diplomatic Value and Strategic Decision’, The Journal of University of International Relations, No. 6. Pp. 1–26, https:// academic. oup. com/ cjip /article /9/1/1/2365941, Accessed on:27/4/2020.

Ikenberry, G. J. (2011). Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order, Princeton University Press.

Ivanov, I. D. (2011). Transforming NATO: New Allies, Missions, and Capabilities (Lexington: Lexington Books).

Muzhi, Y. (1999). ed., Xunzi I, trans. John Knoblock (Changsha: Hunan renmin chubanshe). Qin, Y. (2016).‘Recent Developments toward a Chinese School of IR Theory.https://www.e- ir.info/2016/04/26/recent-developments-toward-a-chinese-school-of-ir-theory/ , Accessed on:23/4/2020.

Shengzu, W. (1995). ‘The History of International Relations (1917–1929), Vol. 4 (Beijing: Shijie zhishi chubanshe) in

Xuetong, Y. (2016). ‘Political Leadership and Power Redistribution, The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 9(1), Spring ,https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pow002, Accessed on:23/4/2020. Shengzu, W. (1999). The History of International Relations (1939–1945) Vol. 6 (Beijing: Shijie zhishi chubanshe) in

Xuetong, Y. (2016). ‘Political Leadership and Power Redistribution, The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 9(1), Spring ,https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pow002, Accessed on:23/4/2020.

Xu, J., & Sun, X. (2016). ‘The Tsinghua Approach and the Development of International Studies in China’, in Zhang, ed., Constructing a Chinese School(s) of International Relations: Ongoing Debate and Critical Assessment (New York: Routledge, forthcoming).

Shikun, M. (2014). Abandoning the Nonalignment Stance? It’s Not A Policy Option for China, the People’s Daily ,Jan 30 , 2014, https://www.chinausfocus.com/foreign-policy/abandoning-the-n onalignment-stance-its-not-a-policy-option-for-china, Accessed on:4/5/2020. 23 IR theory with Chinese characteristics 24 Chinese localization (or nativization) of IR theory 25 China’s exploration of international political theory 26 The Chinese view of international relations or international politics 27 The Chinese School 13