تحلیلی بر گردشگری شهری در بازآفرینی بافت‌های تاریخی از دیدگاه ساکنین محلی با بهره‌گیری از روش تحلیل عاملی (نمونه موردی: شهر شیراز)

محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه علمی برنامه ریزی منطقه ای

علی کریم زاده ¹ , سید کمال الدین شهریاری ² , مهیار اردشیری ³

1 - دانشجوی دکتری شهرسازی، گروه شهرسازی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2 - استادیارگروه شهرسازی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
3 - استادیارگروه شهرسازی، واحد بیضا، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بیضا، ایران

تاریخ دریافت : 1396/04/03 تاریخ پذیرش : 1397/08/27 تاریخ انتشار : 1397/11/01

کلید واژه: شیراز, گردشگری شهری, بازآفرینی شهری, بازآفرینی شهری گردشگری محور,

چکیده مقاله :

     بازآفرینی شهری با محوریت گردشگری به عنوان رویکردی متأخر در دو دهه اخیر، جهت حفاظت و صیانت از بافت­های ارزشمند تاریخی مطرح بوده است. این پژوهش به روش توصیفی - تحلیلی با هدف شناسایی تأثیر گردشگری شهری بر بازآفرینی بافت­های تاریخی از دیدگاه ساکنین محلی تدوین شده است، و ابزار گردآوری اطلاعات از طریق مطالعات کتابخانه­ای و پرسشنامه بوده است. حجم نمونه 400 نفر از ساکنین محلی و به منظور تحلیل داده از نرم­افزار LISRELL استفاده شده است. در این پژوهش چهار محدوده بازآفرینی شده شهر شیراز مورد بررسی قرار گرفته ﻭ از روش تحلیل سلسله­مراتبی AHP، محدوده زندیه انتخاب گردید. یافته­های حاصل از پرسش ساکنین محلی بر اولویت بندی ابعاد تأثیرگذار بر بازآفرینی شهری گردشگری محور به ترتیب بر ابعاد اجتماعی با ضریب همبستگی97/0، ابعاد اقتصادی با ضریب همبستگی 90/0، ابعاد فرهنگی با ضریب همبستگی 90/0 و کالبدی با ضریب همبستگی 83/0، دلالت دارد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Urban regeneration that focusing on tourism was considered as a recent approach in the past two decades, in order to protect and preserve valuable historical contexts. This study has been developed by descriptive - analytical method in order to recognize the impact of urban tourism on regenerating the historical context at local residents' point of view and the collecting data tool was through library studies and questionnaire. The sample size was 360 (n=360) and data are analyzed by using LISRELL software. In this study, four regenerated areas of Shiraz were studied and Zandiye area was chosen by the analytic hierarchy process AHP. The results of questioning the local residents imply the prioritization of the effective dimensions on urban regeneration tourism-led respectively social dimensions with correlation coefficient of 0.97, economic dimensions with correlation coefficient of 0.90, cultural dimensions with correlation coefficient of 0.90 and physical dimensions with correlation coefficient of 0.83.

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Bahraini, S. H. Izadi, M. S. Mofidi, M. (2014): Urban Rehabilitation Approaches and Policies (from Reconstruction to Sustainable Urban Regeneration), Urban Studies, No. 9, p. 18. (In Persian)


2. Bianchini, F. (1994a): Remaking European Cities: The Role of Cultural Policies. In Bianchini F. and Parkinson M. (eds) Cultural Policy and Urban Regeneration: the West European Experience. Manchester University Press, pp.1-20.


3. Brown, A. O’Connor J. and Cohen S. (2000): Local Music Policies within a Global Music Industry: Cultural Quarters in Manchester and Sheffield, Geoforum 31, Elsevier Science Ltd, pp. 437-451.


4. Clark, T. N. (2002): Amenities Drive Urban Growth. Journal of Urban Affairs 24 (5).


5. Craig-Smith, S.J. (1995): The Role of Tourism in Inner-Harbor Redevelopment: A Multinational Perspective. In S.J. Craig-Smith, & M. Fagence (Eds.), Recreation and Tourism as a Catalyst for Urban Waterfront Redevelopment: An International Survey (pp. 15 – 35). Westport CT: Praeger.


6. Cunha, I.V. Selada, I. (2009): “Creative Urban Regeneration: The case of Innovation Hubs”. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 1(4), 494-501.


7. DCMS. (2004): Culture at the Heart of Regeneration. London: Department of Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS).


8. Degen, M. Garcia, M. (2012): The Transformation of the ‘Barcelona Model’: An Analysis of Culture, Urban Regeneration and Governance, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Volume36, Issue5.


9. European Communities, Economic and Social Committee, (1997): Opinion on the First Unravelling the Process of Partnership in Urban Regeneration Policy.


10. Evans, G. Shaw, P.  (2004): A Review of Evidence on the Role of Culture in Regeneration, London: Department for Culture Media and Sport.


11. Fagence, M. (1995): City Waterfront Redevelopment for leisure, Recreation, and Tourism: Some Common Themes, in S. J. Craig-Smith and M. Fagence (eds.), Recreation and Tourism as a Catalyst for Urban Waterfront Redevelopment: An International Survey, Westport: Praeger Publishers, pp. 135-156.


12. Florida, R. (2002): The Rise of the Creative Class and how its Transforming Work, Leisure Community and Everyday life. New York, Basic Books.


13. G. and Tunbridge J. (1990): The Tourist-Historic City. London: Belhaven.


14. Gibson, M.S. Langstaff, M.J. (1982): An Introduction to Urban Renewal. London, Hutchinson and Co.


15. Griffiths, R. (1993): “The Politics of Cultural Policy in Urban Regeneration” Policy and Politics 21(1) 39–46.


16. Hall, C. M. Page, S. J. (2001): Tourism and Recreation. London: Routledge.


17. Hudson, R. (1989): Labor-Market Changes and New Forms of Work in Old Industrial Regions: May be Flexible for Some but Not Flexible Accumulation. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 7:5–30.


18. Landry, C. (2006): Culture & Urban Regeneration: Integrated Approach, Finding and Conclusions of the URBACT Culture Network, Lille: Agence d’urbanisme et de developpement.


19. Lang, T. (2005): Insights in the British Debate about Urban Decline and Urban Regeneration, Leibniz Institute for Regional Development and Structural Planning, working paper available from <http://www.irs-net.de/download/wp_insights.pdf> (accessed on 16th February 2007).


20. Lash, S. Urry, J. (1994): Economies of Signs and Space. London: Sage.


21. Law, C. (1993): Urban Tourism: Attracting visitors to large cities. London: Mansell.


22. Law, C. M. (1992): Urban Tourism and Contribution to Economic Regeneration, Urban Studies, Vol. 29, No. 3/4, pp. 599-618.


23.  Lees, L.  Melhuish, C. (2015): Arts-led Regeneration in the UK: The Rhetoric and the Evidence on Urban Social Inclusion, European Urban and Regional Studies, Vol 22, Issue 3.


24. Leitner, H. nd Sheppard, E. (1998): “Economic Uncertainty, Inter- Urban Competition and Efficacy of Entrepreneurialism”, in T. Hall and P. Hubbard (eds) The Entrepreneurial City: Geography of Politics of Regime of Representation Willey, Chichester.


25. Miles, S. Paddison, R. (2007): Introduction: The Rise and Rise of Culture-led Urban Regeneration. In Paddison R. and Miles S. (eds). Culture-Led Urban Regeneration. London: Routledge.


26. Mola'i Hashjin, N. Ebrahimi,H. (2014): Identification of Tourism Abilities and Attractions and Impact on Tourism Attraction in Amlash City, Regional Planning Quarterly, Fourth Edition, No. 16, Winter. (In Persian)


27. Motiee Langroudi,S.H. Rezaieh Azadi,M. (2013): Evaluating the Impact of Tourism Economics from the Perspective of the Host Society on the Promenade of Orumiyeh Dam, Quarterly Journal of Rural Space Economics, Year 2th, No. 2, Summer. (In Persian)


28. Nouri Kermani, A. Zoogi, A.Yari Hesari, A. Alaei,M. (2009): Urban Tourism and Functional Link with Ecotourism, A Case Study of Kurdistan Province, Geographic Space Journal, Year 9th,Islamic Azad University Ahar Branch. (In Persian)


29. Pratt, A.C. (2009): Urban Regeneration: From the Arts ‘Feel Good’ Factor to the Cultural Economy. A case study of Hoxton, London. Urban Studies, 46(5-8), pp. 1041-1061.


30. Prideaux, B. (2004): Transports and Destination Development. In Lumsdon, L, and Page, S.J, Tourism and Transport: Issues and Agenda for the New Millennium, pp. 79-92, Oxford, Elsevier Ltd.


31. Rauno, S. (2006): Social Impact in Urban Regeneration. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2


32. Reed, Bill. (2007): Shifting from ‘Sustainability’ to Regeneration, Building Research & Information, 35 (6), 674-680.


33. Richards, G. Raymond, C. (2000): Creative Tourism. ATLAS News, No. 23, 16-20.


34. Roberts, P. Sykes, H. (2000): Urban Regeneration: A Handbook, Sage Publications, London.


35. Rogerson, Ch M. (2012): Urban Tourism, Economic Regeneration and Inclusion: Evidence from South Africa, Local Economy, 28(2) 188–202.


36. Scott, A. J. (2006):“Creative Cities: Conceptual Issues and Policy Question”, Journal of Urban Affairs, 28(1), 1-17.


37. Shaw, G. Williams, A. M. (1994): Critical Issues in Tourism: A Geographical Perspective, Oxford: Blackwell.


38. Smith, A. Timberlake, M. (1995): Conceptualizing and Mapping the Structure of World System Cities System .Urban Studies .32, 287-302.


39. Swarbrooke, J. (2000): Tourism, Economic Development and Urban Regeneration: A Critical Evaluation, in M. Robinson, R. Sharpley, N. Evans, P. long and J. Swarbrooke (eds.), Developments in Urban and Rural Tourism: Reflections on International Tourism, Sunderland: Business Education Publishers, pp. 269-285.


40. Swarbrooke, J. Horner, S. (2001a): Business Travel and Tourism, Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.


41. Taghvai,M. Ranjbar Dastnai,M. (2010): An Analysis of the Distribution of Facilities and Services for the North East of the Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province, Journal of Research and Planning, Year 1, No. 1, Summer. (In Persian)


42. Teimuri, E. (2015): The Occurrence of Socio-Political Crises and Effects on Tourism Income (Case study: Iran, Turkey, Egypt), Regional Planning Quarterly, Year 5, No. 20, Winter. (In Persian)


43. UNEPFI, (2008): Responsible Property Investing: What the Leaders are Doing. United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative, Geneva.


44. Uysal, U. (2012): An Urban Social Movement Challenging Urban Regeneration: The Case of Sulukule, Istanbul, Cities, Volume 29, Issue 1.


45. Van der Borg, J. Russo, A. P. (2008): Area Regeneration and Tourism Development: Evidence from Three European Cities. University Ca' Foscari of Venice, Dept. of Economics Research Paper Series No. 21/WP/2008.


46. Zukin, S. (1991): Landscapes of Power: From Detroit to Disney World. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.