رابطه حمایت سرپرست از نیازهای اساسی روان‌شناختی و ارضای نیازهای روان‌شناختی با انگیزش شغلی در کارکنان ستادی و عملیاتی شرکت بهره‌بردای نفت و گاز مارون
محورهای موضوعی : صنعتی
نوری کعب عمیر
1
,
نسرین ارشدی
2
,
علی حریزاوی
3
1 - دکترای روان‌شناسی، گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران
2 - استاد، گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران
3 - کارشناس ارشد روان‌شناسی صنعتی و سازمانی، گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران
کلید واژه: کامروایی نیازهای روان‌شناختی, نیازهای اساسی روان‌شناختی, حمایت سرپرست, انگیزش شغلی,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف از این پژوهش بررسی رابطه حمایت سرپرست از نیازهای اساسی روان شناختی و ارضای نیازهای روان شناختی با انگیزش شغلی در کارکنان ستادی و عملیاتی شرکت بهره برداری نفت و گاز مارون بود. شرکت کنندگان در این پژوهش شامل 246 نفر بودند که به روش نمونه گیری تصادفی طبقه ای انتخاب شدند. ابزارهای مورد استفاده در این پژوهش عبارت بودند از؛ مقیاس حمایت از نیازها در محیط کار (تافولین و استنلینگ، 2018)، مقیاس ارضای نیازها در محیط کار (تافولین و استنلینگ، 2018)، و مقیاس انگیزش شغلی چندبُعدی (گاگنه و همکاران، 2015). ارزیابی الگوی پیشنهادی از طریق مدل‌یابی معادلات ساختاری (SEM) با استفاده از نرم‌افزار AMOS-24 انجام گرفت. همچنین، به منظور مقایسه مدل پیشنهادی در بین کارکنان ستادی و عملیاتی، از روش تحلیل الگویابی معادلات ساختاری چندگروهی در نرم افزار AMOS-24 استفاده شد. یافته‌ها نشان‌دهنده برازش مطلوب الگوی پیشنهادی با داده‌ها بود. نتایج نشان داد که حمایت سرپرست از نیازهای اساسی روان شناختی کارکنان بر ارضای نیازهای روان شناختی، انگیزش خودمختار، انگیزش کنترل شده و بی انگیزگی آنان اثر مستقیم و معنی داری دارد (01/0p<). نتایج همچنین از تأثیر غیرمستقیم حمایت سرپرست از نیازهای اساسی روان‌شناختی بر انگیزش خودمختار، انگیزش کنترل شده و بی انگیزگی از طریق ارضای نیازهای روان شناختی حمایت کرد (001/0p<). علاوه بر این، یافته‌ها نشان‌دهنده تفاوت معنی‌دار الگو در کارکنان ستادی و عملیاتی بود (01/0p<).
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship model of supervisor support for basic psychological needs, need satisfaction, and job motivation in staff and line employees in Marun Oil and Gas Producing Company. The participants of this study consisted of 246 employees, who were selected by a stratified random sampling method. The instruments used in the study were Need Support at Work Scale (Tafvelin & Stenling, 2018), Need Satisfaction at Work Scale (Tafvelin & Stenling, 2018), and Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale (Gagné et al., 2015). Structural equation modeling (SEM) through AMOS-24 was used for the proposed model analysis. Also, to compare the proposed model between staff and line employees, the multi-group structural equation modeling analysis was used in AMOS-24 software. The results showed a good fit of the proposed model with the data. According to the results, the supervisor support for the basic psychological needs of employees has a direct and significant effect on the need satisfaction, autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, and amotivation of them (p<0.01). The results also supported the indirect effect of supervisor support of basic psychological needs on autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, and amotivation through the satisfaction of psychological needs (p<0.001). Also, the results showed that there is a significant difference between the model of staff and line employees (p<0.01).
Alvarez, M. S., Balaguer, I., Castillo, I., & Duda, J. L. (2009). Coach autonomy support and quality of sport engagement in young soccer players. The Spanish journal of psychology, 12(1), 138–148.
Bandura, A. (1996). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Beshlideh, K. (2017). Research methods and statistical analysis of research examples using SPSS and AMOS (For studies in humanities). Ahvaz: Shahid Chamran University Press. (In Persian)
Chatzisarantis, N., Ada, E. N., Ahmadi, M., Caltabiano, N., Wang, D., Thogersen-Ntoumani, C., & Hagger, M. S. (2019). Differential effects of perceptions of equal, favorable and unfavorable autonomy support on educational and well-being outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 33–43.
Chen, K. C., Elliot, A. J., & Sheldon, K. M. (2019). Psychological need support as a predictor of intrinsic and external motivation: The mediational role of achievement goals. Educational Psychology, 39(8), 1090–1113.
Chen, K. C., & Jang, S. J. (2010). Motivation in online learning: Testing a model of self-determination theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 741–752.
Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., & Song, Y. G. (2016). A teacher-focused intervention to decrease PE students’ amotivation by increasing need satisfaction and decreasing need frustration. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 38, 217–235.
Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., & Soo Moon, I. (2012). Experimentally based, longitudinally designed, teacher-focused intervention to help physical education teachers be more autonomy supportive toward their students. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 34, 365–396.
Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19–43.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological wellbeing across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology, 49, 14–23.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2011). Levels of analysis, regnant causes of behavior and wellbeing: The role of psychological needs. Psychological Inquiry, 22, 17–22.
De Cooman, R., Stynen, D., Van den Broeck, A., Sels, L., & De Witte, H. (2013). How job characteristics relate to need satisfaction and autonomous motivation: Implications for work effort. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 1342–1352.
Dehghanan, H., Khashei, V., & Rahimi, S. (2016). Self-determination theory as a framework for exploring the impact of work climate and social network size on motivation of volunteering activities. Researches of Management Organizational Resources, 6(3), 61–82. (In Persian)
Eghtedari, M. A. (2013). Organization and management: System and organizational behavior. Tehran: Molavi Publishers. (In Persian)
Gagné, M. (2014). The Oxford handbook of work engagement, motivation, and self-determination theory. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Gagné, M., & Deci, L. E. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362.
Gagné, M., Forest, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Crevier-Braud, L., Van den Broeck, A., Aspeli, A. K., et al. (2015). The Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries. European Journal of Organizational Psychology, 24(2), 178–196.
Gillet, N., Gagné, M., Sauvagère, S., & Fouquereau, E. (2013). The role of supervisor autonomy support, organizational support, and autonomous and controlled motivation in predicting employees' satisfaction and turnover intentions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(4), 450–460.
Hagger, M. S., Hardcastle, S. J., Chater, A., Mallet, C., Pal, S., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2014). Autonomous and controlled motivational regulations for multiple health-related behaviors: between- and within-participants analyses. Health Psychology & Behavioral Medicine, 2(1), 565–601.
Hocine, Z., & Zhang, J. (2014). Autonomy supportive leadership: A new framework for understanding effective leadership through self-determination theory. International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management, 7(2), 135–149.
Howard, J., Gagné, M., Morin, A. J. S., & Van den Broeck, A. (2016). Motivation profiles at work: A self-determination theory approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 95, 74–89.
Jungert, T., Van den Broeck, A., Schreurs, B., & Osterman, U. (2018). How colleagues can support each other’s needs and motivation: An intervention on employee work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 67(1), 3–29.
Kark, R., Van Dijk, D., & Vashdi, D. R. (2018). Motivated or demotivated to be creative: The role of self‐regulatory focus in transformational and transactional leadership processes. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 67(1), 186–224.
Lavasani, M. G., Khezriazar, H., Saleh Najafi, M., & Maleki, A. (2017). A structural model of the relationship between basic psychological needs, academic motivation and English academic engagement. Quarterly Educational Psychology, 13(43), 35–58. (In Persian)
Mageau, G. A., & Vallerand, R. J. (2003). The coach-athlete relationship: A motivational model. Journal of Sports Sciences, 21, 883–904.
Mahmoodikia, M. (2020). The comparison of theoretical and exploratory models of affecting factors on turnover intention in employees of Aghajari Oil and Gas Production Company (AOGPC). Dissertation for the PhD degree in Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran. (In Persian)
Moradi, M., Sheikholeslami, R., Ahmadzadeh, M., & Cheraghi, A. (2014). Social support, basic psychological needs and psychological well-being: Examining a causal model in employed women. Developmental Psychology: Iranian Psychologist, 10(39), 297-309. (In Persian)
Moran, C. M., Diefendorff, J. M., Kim, T., & Liu, Z. (2012). A profile approach to self-determination theory motivations at work. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81, 354–363.
Parfyonova, N. M., Meyer, J. P., Espinoza, J. A., Anderson, B. K., Cameron, K. A., Daljeet, K. N., & Vaters, C. (2019). Managerial support for employees’ psychological needs: A multidimensional approach. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 51(2), 122–134.
Pinder, C. C. (1998). Work motivation in organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Reeve, J. (2018). Understanding motivation and emotion (7th Edition). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Ryan, R. M. (1993). Agency and organization: Intrinsic motivation, autonomy and the self in psychological development. In J. Jacobs (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Developmental perspectives on motivation (Vol. 40, pp. 1–56). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 1–11.
Ryan, R. M., Lynch, M. F., Vansteenkiste, M., & Deci, E. L. (2011). Motivation and autonomy in counseling, psychotherapy, and behavior change: A look at theory and practice 1ψ7. The Counseling Psychologist, 39(2), 193–260.
Slemp, G. R., Kern, M. L., Patrick, K. J., & Ryan, R. M. (2018). Leader autonomy support in the workplace: A meta-analytic view. Motivation and Emotion, 42(5), 706–724.
Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Shapiro, D. L. (2004). The future of work motivation. Academy of Management Review, 29, 379-387.
Tafvelin, S., & Stenling, A. (2018). Development and initial validation of the Need Satisfaction and Need Support at Work Scales: A validity-focused approach. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 3(1), 1–14.
Tremblay, M. A., Blanchard, C. M., Taylor, S., Pelletier, L. G., & Villeneuve, M. (2009). Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale: Its value for organizational psychology research. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 41(4), 213-226.
Urdan, T., & Schoenfelder, E. (2006). Classroom effects on student motivation: Goal structures, social relationships, and competence beliefs. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 331–349.
Van den Broeck, A., Carpini, J., Leroy, H., & Diefendorff, J. (2017). How much effort will I put into my work? It depends on your type of motivation. In N. Chmiel, F. Franccaroli, & M. Sverke (Eds), An introduction to work and organizational psychology: An international perspective (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.
Van den Broeck, A., Ferris, D. L., Chang, C. H., & Rosen, C. C. (2016). A review of self-determination theory’s basic psychological needs at work. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1195–1229.
Van den Broeck, A., Lens, W., De Witte, H., & Van Coillie, H. (2013). Unraveling the importance of the quantity and the quality of workers’ motivation for well-being: A person-centered perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 82, 69–78.
Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., De Witte, H., Soenens, B., & Lens, W. (2010). Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the Work-Related Basic Need Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 981–1002.
Williams, G. C., Halvari, H., Niemiec, C. P., Sorebo, O., Olafson, A. H., & Wesbye, C. (2014). Managerial support for basic psychological needs, somatic symptom burden and work-related correlates: A self-determination theory perspective. Work & Stress, 28(4), 404–419.
Williams, G. C., Patrick, H., Niemiec, C. P., Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., & Lavigne, H. M. (2011). The smoker’s health project: A self-determination theory intervention to facilitate maintenance of tobacco abstinence. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 32, 535–543.
_||_