• صفحه اصلی
  • تولید بیوگاز با استفاده از فضولات شتر و پسماند گیاه پالایی در مناطق حاشیه کویر با استفاده از روش AHP فازی

اشتراک گذاری

آدرس مقاله


کد مقاله : JSDE-2209-1227 (R1) بازدید : 125 صفحه: 91 - 102

نوع مقاله: پژوهشی

تولید بیوگاز با استفاده از فضولات شتر و پسماند گیاه پالایی در مناطق حاشیه کویر با استفاده از روش AHP فازی

محورهای موضوعی : آلودگی های محیط زیست (آب، خاک و هوا)

امید محمد علیخان 1 , شهرزاد خرم نژادیان 2

1 - دانشجوی مقطع دکتری، گروه علوم و مهندسی محیط زیست، واحد دماوند، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، دماوند، ایران.
2 - استادیار، گروه علوم و مهندسی محیط زیست ،واحد دماوند، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، دماوند، ایران. *(مسوول مکاتبات)

تاریخ دریافت : 1401/06/20 تاریخ پذیرش : 1401/10/21 تاریخ انتشار : 1401/10/01

کلید واژه: پسماند, بیوگاز, فضولات شتر, گیاه پالایی,

چکیده مقاله :

زمینه و هدف: تولید انرژی پاک و حذف پسماند از اولویتهای جوامع دوستدار محیط زیست میباشد. با تولید بیوگاز از کود هم میتوان آلودگی بیولوژیک در محیط را کاهش داد و هم میتوان انرژی تولید نمود، گیاه پالایی از روشهای حذف آلودگی خاک میباشد .هدف از این تحقیق بررسی تولید بیوگاز از فضولات شتر و پسماند گیاه پالایی و همچنین شناسایی متغیرها که باعث بهبود تولید بیوگاز میشوند با استفاده از روشAHP فازی میباشد. روش بررسی: بارگزاری فضولات شتر در هاضم در دماهای مختلف مزوفیلیک(36-37)، ترموفیلیک (55) انجام گرفته است. پسماند ناشی از گیاه پالایی سرب در خاک با فضولات شتر مخلوط گشته و در شرایط مشابه بارگزاری شد. در طول 1 ماه بارگزاری مواد، میزان تولید بیوگاز اندازه گیری گردید. نتایج بدست آمده با استفاده از نرم افزار SPSS آنالیز گردیده است. یافته ها: نتایج نشان داد که میزان pH نقش مهمی در تولید بیوگاز ایفا میکند. بارگزاری اول به دلیل خوراک ورودی کم و همچنین نرسیدن به زمان مورد نظر جهت انجام عملیات هضم میزان pH هاضم کم و در نتیجه تولید گاز بسیار اندک بود که با تدریج با افزایش تعداد بارگزاری سرعت تولید گاز و مقدار تولید گاز افزایش پیدا کرد. همچنین مشخص شد با افزایش میزان پسماند گیاه پالایی میزان تولید بیوگاز کاهش می یابد. با استفاده از روش AHP فازی پارامترها رتبه بندی شدند. بحث و نتیجه گیری: با توجه به نتایج بدست آمده، فضولات شتر پتانسیل مناسبی برای تولید بیوگاز دارند.میزان ازت و فسفر بیشتر اهمیت را در تولید بیوگاز دارند و نسبت مواد جامد فرار کمترین رتبه را طبق روش AHP فازی دارد. پسماند ناشی از گیاه پالایی را در مقادیر کم میتوان اضافه نمود.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Background & Objective: Production of clean energy and elimination of waste is one of the priorities of environmentally friendly societies. By producing biogas from manure, biological pollution in the environment can be reduced and energy can be produced. Phytoremediation is one of the ways to remove soil pollutant. The purpose of this research is to investigate the production of biogas from camel dung and phytoremediation waste and also to identify the variables that improve biogas production using the fuzzy AHP method. Material and Methodology: The loading of camel dung in the digester has been done at different mesophilic and thermophilic temperatures (36-37 and 55). The waste from the lead phytoremediation was mixed with camel dung and was loaded in similar conditions. During 1 month of material loading, biogas production was measured. The results have been analyzed using SPSS software. Findings: The results showed that pH plays an important role in biogas production. The first load was low due to low input feed as well as failing to reach the desired digestion operation, resulting in very low digestive pH, which gradually increased as the number of gas production speeds and gas production increased. It was also found to decrease the amount of biogas production as the amount of refined plant was increased. The parameters were ranked using the fuzzy AHP method. Discussion and Conclusion: According to the results, camel dung has a good potential for biogas production. Nitrogen and phosphorus are more important in biogas production and the ratio of volatile solids has the lowest rank according to the fuzzy AHP method. Phytoremediation waste could be used in small amounts.

منابع و مأخذ:


  1. Saidu Y, Odutola A, Jafali J et al. (2013) Contextualizing the informed consent process in vaccine trials in developing countries. Journal of Clinical Research and Bioethics 4, 141.
    2.
  2. Afazeli, H., Jafari, A., Rafiee, S. & Nosrati, M. (2014). An investigation of biogas production potential from livestock and slaughterhouse wastes, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 34, 380-386.
    3.
  3. El-Mashad, H.M. and Zhang, R. (2010). Biogas production from co-digestion of dairy manure and food waste. Bioresource technology, 101(11), pp. 4021-4028.
    4.
  4. Chhabra, Abha, K. R. Manjunath, Sushma Panigrahy, and J. S. Parihar. "Spatial pattern of methane emissions from Indian livestock." Current Science (2009): 683-689.
    5.
  5. Kargar Borzi, N., & Vali, A. (2017). Production and reproduction characteristics and breeding status of camel in Kerman province. Applied Animal Science Research Journal, 5(21), 81-88. doi: 10.22092/aasrj.2017.114987.1124 (In Persian)
    6.
  6. Ahmadi Asour, A., Saghi, M. H., Khamirchi, R., Vaziri, T., & Rastegar, A. (2013). A Study of the Chemical and Physical Properties obtained from the Composition of Live stock and Poultry Wastes in Biogas System. Journal of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, 20(2), 222-229. (In Persian)
    7.
  7. Salehi, K., Khazraee, S., Hosseini, F., & Khosravani Pour Mostafazadeh, F. (2014). Biogas Production from Chicken Waste and Sheep Manure in Laboratory Scale. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16(1), 463-470. (In Persian)
    8.
  8. alidadi H, etemadi mashhadi S, najafpoor A, moheb rad B. Investigation of Biogas Production Process by the Mixture of Landfill Leachate and Animal Waste. J Health Res Commun 2017; 3 (2):44-54. (In Persian)
    9.
  9. Yan A, Wang Y, Tan SN, Mohd Yusof ML, Ghosh S and Chen Z (2020) Phytoremediation: A Promising Approach for Revegetation of Heavy Metal-Polluted Land. Front. Plant Sci. 11:359.
    10.
  10. Stine SW, Pepper IL, Gerba CP. Contribution of drinking water to the weekly intake of heterotrophic bacteria from diet in the United States. Water Research. 2005 January; 39 (1): 257-263.
    11.
  11. Taghinazhad, J., Abdi, R., & Adl, M. (2018). Modeling of Biogas Production Process from Cow Manure with Completely Stirred Tank Reactor under Semi Continuously Feeding. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 8(1), 159-169. doi: 10.22067/jam.v8i1.57758. (In Persian)
    12.
  12. Sarkheil, H., Azimi, Y., & Rahbari, S. (2018). Modeling environmental air quality assessment using fuzzy logic in the Pars Special Economic Energy Zone (Case study: Assaluyeh, Bidkhon and Shirino regions). Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 20(4), 1-16. doi: 10.22034/jest.2019.13698.­(In Persian )
    13.
  13. Monnet, F. 2003. An introduction to anaerobic digestion of organic waste (Final report). Remade Scotland. p.48.
    14.
  14. Mohammed Silwadi, Hasan Mousa, Badriya Yahya AL-Hajji, Shamsa Said AL-Wahaibi & Zainab Zayid AL-Harrasi (2022) Enhancing biogas production by anaerobic digestion of animal manure, International Journal of Green Energy, DOI: 10.1080/15435075.2022.2038608
    15.
  15. Nguyen, N.N., Rana, A., Goldman, C., Moore, R., Tai, J., Hong, Y., Shen, J., Walker, D.W., Hur, J.H. (2019). Proteasome β5 subunit overexpression improves proteostasis during aging and extends lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster.  Rep. 9(1): 3170.
    16.
  16. Kheira BN, Dadamoussa B, Bendraoua A, Mel M, Labed B. Effects of Co-digestion of Camel Dung and Municipal Solid Wastes on Quality of Biogas, Methane and Biofertilizer Production. J. Adv. Res. Fluid Mech. Therm. Sc. [Internet]. 2020Dec.1 [cited 2022Jul.31]; 40(1):7-17.
    17.
  17. Altaş, “Inhibitory effect of heavy metals on methane-producing anaerobic granular sludge,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 162, no. 2-3, pp. 1551–1556, 2009.
    18.
  18. Quang-Minh Nguyen, Duy-Cam Bui, Thao Phuong, Van-Huong Doan, Thi-Nham Nguyen, Minh-Viet Nguyen, Thien-Hien Tran, Quang-Trung Do, "Investigation of Heavy Metal Effects on the Anaerobic Co-Digestion Process of Waste Activated Sludge and Septic Tank Sludge", International Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 2019, Article ID 5138060, 9 pages, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5138060
    19.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

_||_

  1. Saidu Y, Odutola A, Jafali J et al. (2013) Contextualizing the informed consent process in vaccine trials in developing countries. Journal of Clinical Research and Bioethics 4, 141.
    2.
  2. Afazeli, H., Jafari, A., Rafiee, S. & Nosrati, M. (2014). An investigation of biogas production potential from livestock and slaughterhouse wastes, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 34, 380-386.
    3.
  3. El-Mashad, H.M. and Zhang, R. (2010). Biogas production from co-digestion of dairy manure and food waste. Bioresource technology, 101(11), pp. 4021-4028.
    4.
  4. Chhabra, Abha, K. R. Manjunath, Sushma Panigrahy, and J. S. Parihar. "Spatial pattern of methane emissions from Indian livestock." Current Science (2009): 683-689.
    5.
  5. Kargar Borzi, N., & Vali, A. (2017). Production and reproduction characteristics and breeding status of camel in Kerman province. Applied Animal Science Research Journal, 5(21), 81-88. doi: 10.22092/aasrj.2017.114987.1124 (In Persian)
    6.
  6. Ahmadi Asour, A., Saghi, M. H., Khamirchi, R., Vaziri, T., & Rastegar, A. (2013). A Study of the Chemical and Physical Properties obtained from the Composition of Live stock and Poultry Wastes in Biogas System. Journal of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, 20(2), 222-229. (In Persian)
    7.
  7. Salehi, K., Khazraee, S., Hosseini, F., & Khosravani Pour Mostafazadeh, F. (2014). Biogas Production from Chicken Waste and Sheep Manure in Laboratory Scale. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16(1), 463-470. (In Persian)
    8.
  8. alidadi H, etemadi mashhadi S, najafpoor A, moheb rad B. Investigation of Biogas Production Process by the Mixture of Landfill Leachate and Animal Waste. J Health Res Commun 2017; 3 (2):44-54. (In Persian)
    9.
  9. Yan A, Wang Y, Tan SN, Mohd Yusof ML, Ghosh S and Chen Z (2020) Phytoremediation: A Promising Approach for Revegetation of Heavy Metal-Polluted Land. Front. Plant Sci. 11:359.
    10.
  10. Stine SW, Pepper IL, Gerba CP. Contribution of drinking water to the weekly intake of heterotrophic bacteria from diet in the United States. Water Research. 2005 January; 39 (1): 257-263.
    11.
  11. Taghinazhad, J., Abdi, R., & Adl, M. (2018). Modeling of Biogas Production Process from Cow Manure with Completely Stirred Tank Reactor under Semi Continuously Feeding. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 8(1), 159-169. doi: 10.22067/jam.v8i1.57758. (In Persian)
    12.
  12. Sarkheil, H., Azimi, Y., & Rahbari, S. (2018). Modeling environmental air quality assessment using fuzzy logic in the Pars Special Economic Energy Zone (Case study: Assaluyeh, Bidkhon and Shirino regions). Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 20(4), 1-16. doi: 10.22034/jest.2019.13698.­(In Persian )
    13.
  13. Monnet, F. 2003. An introduction to anaerobic digestion of organic waste (Final report). Remade Scotland. p.48.
    14.
  14. Mohammed Silwadi, Hasan Mousa, Badriya Yahya AL-Hajji, Shamsa Said AL-Wahaibi & Zainab Zayid AL-Harrasi (2022) Enhancing biogas production by anaerobic digestion of animal manure, International Journal of Green Energy, DOI: 10.1080/15435075.2022.2038608
    15.
  15. Nguyen, N.N., Rana, A., Goldman, C., Moore, R., Tai, J., Hong, Y., Shen, J., Walker, D.W., Hur, J.H. (2019). Proteasome β5 subunit overexpression improves proteostasis during aging and extends lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster.  Rep. 9(1): 3170.
    16.
  16. Kheira BN, Dadamoussa B, Bendraoua A, Mel M, Labed B. Effects of Co-digestion of Camel Dung and Municipal Solid Wastes on Quality of Biogas, Methane and Biofertilizer Production. J. Adv. Res. Fluid Mech. Therm. Sc. [Internet]. 2020Dec.1 [cited 2022Jul.31]; 40(1):7-17.
    17.
  17. Altaş, “Inhibitory effect of heavy metals on methane-producing anaerobic granular sludge,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 162, no. 2-3, pp. 1551–1556, 2009.
    18.
  18. Quang-Minh Nguyen, Duy-Cam Bui, Thao Phuong, Van-Huong Doan, Thi-Nham Nguyen, Minh-Viet Nguyen, Thien-Hien Tran, Quang-Trung Do, "Investigation of Heavy Metal Effects on the Anaerobic Co-Digestion Process of Waste Activated Sludge and Septic Tank Sludge", International Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 2019, Article ID 5138060, 9 pages, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5138060
    19.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

مقالات مرتبط

حقوق این وب‌سایت متعلق به سامانه مدیریت نشریات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی است.
حق نشر © 1403-1400

صفحه اصلی| عضویت/ ورود| درباره سند| تماس با ما|
[English] [العربية] [en] [ar]