ارزیابی مدل تحمل پریشانی بر اساس سبک زندگی ناخوشایند با میانجی گری تنظیم شناختی هیجان در پرستاران زن بیمارستان در دوران شیوع کرونا
محورهای موضوعی : تکتونواستراتیگرافیهادی براتی 1 , فریبا حسنی 2 , افسانه قنبری پناه 3 , کامبیز پوشنه 4
1 - دانشجوی دکتری مشاوره، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
2 - گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
3 - استادیار، گروه مشاوره، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
4 - استادیار، گروه مشاوره، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
کلید واژه: تنظیم شناختی هیجان, تحمل پریشانی, پرستاران زن, کرونا ویروس, سبک زندگی ناخوشایند,
چکیده مقاله :
چکیده
هدف از انجام این پژوهش بررسی ارزیابی مدل تحمل پریشانی بر اساس سبک زندگی ناخوشایند با میانجیگری تنظیم شناختی هیجان در پرستاران زن بیمارستان بود. طرح پژوهش همبستگی و از نوع مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری بود. این پژوهش با حضور 500 نفر به روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس از بین پرستاران زن مشغول به کار در بیمارستان‌های شهر اصفهان در سال 1400 انجام شد. برای اندازه‌گیری متغیرهای پژوهش از مقیاس تحمل پریشانی (simons & gaher 2005)، پرسشنامه سبک زندگی (Smith and Miller, 1988) و پرسشنامه تنظیم شناختی هیجانی (Garnefski and Kraaij, 2007) استفاده شد. داده‌ها با ضریب همبستگی پیرسون و معادلات ساختاری و با استفاده از نرم افزارهای SPSS و AMOS تحلیل شد. نتایج نشان داد که سبک زندگی ناخوشایند و تنظیم شناختی هیجان ناسازگارانه بر تحمل پریشانی اثر مستقیم و منفی دارد (01/0>P). همچنین تنظیم شناختی هیجان سازگارانه بر تحمل پریشانی اثر مستقیم و مثبت دارد (01/0>P). همچنین بر اساس یافتههای این پژوهش، مدل اصلاح شده از برازش مطلوبی برخوردار بود. مدل مورد نظر از برازندگی مطلوبی برخوردار است و گام مهمی در جهت شناخت عوامل مؤثر بر تحمل پریشانی پرستاران زن است و مسئولان بیمارستان‌ها می‌توانند در راستای بهبود تحمل پریشانی پرستاران خود در دوران شیوع کرونا ویروس از نتایج این پژوهش استفاده کنند.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluation modeling distress tolerance based on unpleasant lifestyle with mediation of cognitive emotion regulation in in women nurses’ hospital in during Coronavirus disease. The research design was a structural equation modeling relationship. This study was conducted in the presence of 500 people women nurses’ hospital by available sampling method among in hospitals in Isfahan city in year 1400. To measure the variables, distress tolerance scale (DTS) of Simons and Gaher (2005), lifestyle inventory (LSI) of Smith and Miller (2001) and cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire (CERQ) of Garnefski and Kraaij (2007) were used. Data were analyzed using Pearson correlation and structural equation modelling with using SPSS and AMOS software was investigated.The results showed that lifestyle and maladaptive cognitive regulation of emotion have a direct and negative effect on distress tolerance (P <0.01). Also, the adaptive cognitive regulation of emotion has a direct and positive effect on distress tolerance (P <0.01). Also, proposed model had an acceptable fitness to the data and indirect pathways. The evaluated model has a good fit and is an important step in identifying the factors that are effective in distress tolerance in hospital staff and Hospital officials can use the results of this study to improve nurses' distress tolerance during coronavirus outbreaks.
Refrences
1- Güldal Ş, Kılıçoğlu NA, Kasapoğlu F. Psychological Flexibility, Coronavirus Anxiety, Humor and Social Media Addiction During COVID-19 Pandemic in Turkey. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 2012, 1-23.
2- Malesza M, Kaczmarek MC. Predictors of anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland. Personality and individual differences, 2021, 170(1), 1-10.
3- Rahmanian M; Kamali A, Moslinejad H, Foroughian M, Kalani N, Hatami N, Haideranjad M, Rait Dost A, Obiri S. Comparison of the level of anxiety in medical and non-medical staff of Jahrom city in exposure and non- exposure to the new corona virus (Covid-19) in 2019. Journal of Arak University of Medical Sciences, 2019, 23(1), 1-10.
4- Di Trani M, Mariani R, Ferri R, De Berardinis D, Frigo MG. From resilience to burnout in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 emergency: the role of the ability to tolerate uncertainty. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021, 12(2), 1-10.
5- Hines SE, Chin KH, Glick DR, Wickwire EM. Trends in moral injury, distress, and resilience factors among healthcare workers at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18(2), 488.
6- Simons JS, Gaher RM. The Distress Tolerance Scale: Development and validation of a self-report measure. Motivation and Emotion, 2005, 29(2), 83-102.
7- Peraza N, Smit T, Garey L, Manning K, Buckner JD, Zvolensky MJ. Distress tolerance and cessation-related cannabis processes: The role of cannabis use coping motives. Addictive behaviors, 2019, 90, 164-170.
8- Mattingley S, Youssef GJ, Manning V, Graeme L, Hall K. Distress Tolerance across Substance Use, Eating, and Borderline Personality Disorders: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of affective disorders, 2022, 1(2), 1-10.
9- Kozak AT, Fought A. Beyond alcohol and drug addiction. Does the negative trait of low distress tolerance have an association with overeating?. Appetite, 2011, 57(3), 578-581.
10- Tofangchi M, Raisi Z, Qumrani A, Rezaei H. Development of a package for promoting distress tolerance and comparing its effectiveness with compassion-based treatment on self-criticism, fear of negative evaluation, and anxiety in women with chronic tension headaches. Scientific Research Quarterly of Psychological Sciences, 2021, 20(100), 634-621. Rahmanian, M.; Kamali.
11- Ranney RM, Berenz E, Rappaport LM, Amstadter A, Dick D. Anxiety sensitivity and distress tolerance predict changes in internalizing symptoms in individuals exposed to interpersonal trauma. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2022, 46(1), 217-231.
12- Rette DN, Arnold MS, McDonald EM, Hoptman MJ, Collins KA, Iosifescu DV. Influences on childhood depressive symptoms: The effects of trauma and distress tolerance across age and sex groups. Journal of Affective Disorders, 2021, 283, 373-376.
13- Browning ME, Van Kirk NP, Krompinger JW. Examining depression symptoms within OCD: the role of experiential avoidance. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 2021, 1(2), 1-14.
14- Vujanovic AA, Webber HE, McGrew SJ, Green CE, Lane SD, Schmitz JM. Distress tolerance: prospective associations with cognitive-behavioral therapy outcomes in adults with posttraumatic stress and substance use disorders. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 2022, 1-17.
15- Mohammadi H, Jabal Ameli S, Haqat A, Ranjbarkhan Z. Structural model of the effect of health-promoting lifestyle and distress tolerance on chronic pain acceptance in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: the mediating role of learned helplessness. Journal of Anesthesia and Pain, 2021, 12(3), 35-49.
16- Nabizadeh Gargozar Z, Sharifi Kh. Lifestyle of Iranian nurses: a systematic review. Nursing Management Quarterly, 2019, 9(1), 45-36.
17- Casini E, Glemser C, Premoli M, Preti E, Richetin J. The mediating role of emotion regulation strategies on the association between rejection sensitivity, aggression, withdrawal, and prosociality. Emotion, 2021, 5 (3), 1-12.
18- Carvajal BP, Molina-Martínez M Á, Fernández-Fernández V, Paniagua-Granados T, Lasa-Aristu A, Luque-Reca O. Psychometric properties of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) in Spanish older adults. Aging & Mental Health, 2022, 26(2), 413-422.
19- Betegón E, Rodríguez-Medina J, Del-Valle M, Irurtia MJ. Emotion Regulation in Adolescents: Evidence of the Validity and Factor Structure of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, 19(6), 3602.
20- Wytykowska A, Fajkowska M, Skimina E. Taking a person-centered approach to cognitive emotion regulation: A latent-profile analysis of temperament and anxiety, and depression types. Personality and Individual Differences, 2022, 189, 111489.
21- Castellano E, Muñoz Navarro R, Toledo MS, Spontón C, Medrano LA. Cognitive processes of emotional regulation, burnout and work engagement. Psicothema, 2019, 31(1), 73-80.
22- Garnefski N, Kraaij V. Specificity of relations between adolescents’ cognitive emotion regulation strategies and symptoms of depression and anxiety. Cognition and Emotion, 2018, 32(7), 1401-1408.
23- Weindl D, Knefel M, Glück T, Lueger-Schuster B. Emotion regulation strategies, self-esteem, and anger in adult survivors of childhood maltreatment in foster care. settings. European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 2020, 4 (4), 1-10.
24- Preece DA, Goldenberg A, Becerra R, Boyes M, Hasking P, Gross J. J. (2021). Loneliness and emotion regulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 180, 110974.
25- Ghaffari, S; and Karimi, M. (2021). The role of cognitive regulation of emotion and ataxia in job burnout of public library librarians in Semnan province in 2019. Science and Technology of Information Management, 7(1), 153-174.
26- Arici-Ozcan N, Cekici F, Arslan R. The relationship between resilience and distress tolerance in college students: The mediator role of cognitive flexibility and difficulties in emotion regulation. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 2019, 5(4), 525-533.
27- Ghorbani Taqlid Abad Victim B, Tasbihzadeh Mashhadhi R. The relationship between cognitive emotion regulation
mechanisms and lifestyle with perceived stress in irritable bowel syndrome patients. Quarterly Journal of Thought and Behavior in Clinical Psychology, 2015, 11(39), 17-26.
28- Cramer D, Howitt DL. The Sage dictionary of statistics: a practical resource for students in the social sciences. Sage. 2004. 29- Esmaili Nesab M, Andami Khosh A, Azermi H, Marrokhi A. The predictive role of difficulty in emotion regulation and distress tolerance in students' addiction. Addiction Research Quarterly, 2013, 8(29), 63-49.
30- Zanjani Z, Moqbli Hanzaei M, Mohsen Abadi h. The relationship between depression, distress tolerance and difficulty in emotion regulation with mobile phone addiction in Kashan University students. Faiz bimonthly scientif research journal, 2017, 22(4), 420-411.
31- Kerami N, Amini N, Behrouzi M; Jafari Nia Gh. The mediating role of social isolation in the relationship between brain-behavioral systems and hexaco personality traits with distress tolerance in drug dependent individuals.Counseling and Psychotherapy Culture, 2021, 12(47), 258-221.
32- Veilleux JC, Pollert GA, Zielinski MJ, Shaver JA, Hill MA. Behavioral assessment of the negative emotion aspect of distress tolerance: Tolerance to emotional images. Assessment, 2019, 26(3), 386-403.
33- Brati H, Rezaei F, Karimzadeh H. Prediction of tendency to smoke based on variables of parenting methods and lifestyle in male students of Khomeinishahr Islamic Azad University. Knowledge and Research Quarterly in Applied Psychology, 2017,
19(1), 81-90.
34- Ahmadi M. The relationship between religious beliefs and lifestyle with the quality of life of female students of second secondary school in Zanjan city. Journal of Women and Family Studies, 2014, 8(30), 7-20
35- Fazel A, Haqshanas H, Keshavarz Z. The35- Fazel A, Haqshanas H, Keshavarz Z. The power of predicting personality traits and lifestyle on marital satisfaction of female nurses in Shiraz. Women and Society Scientific-Research Quarterly, 2012, 2(7), 139-163.
36- Garnefski N, Kraaij V. The cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire. Europeanjournal of psychological assessment, 2007, 23(3), 141-149.
37- Kraaij V, Garnefski N. The Behavioral Emotion Regulation Questionnaire: Development, psychometric properties and relationships with emotional problems and the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 2019, 137(2018), 56–61.
38-Weston R, Gore Jr P A. A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The counseling psychologist, 2006, 34(5), 719-751. 39- Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications. 2015.
_||_