تهیه و تدوین الگوی یادگیری خلاق در ساختار برنامه درسی آموزش دوره متوسطه

محورهای موضوعی : تکتونواستراتیگرافی

محمدصادق حسینی ¹ , نادره سهرابی ² , حسین بقولى ³ , مجید برزگر ⁴

1 - دانشجوی دکتری روانشناسی تربیتی، گروه روان‌شناسی، واحد مرودشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مرودشت، ایران
2 - استادیار گروه روان‌شناسی، واحد مرودشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مرودشت، ایران
3 - استادیار گروه روانشناسی، واحد مرودشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مرودشت، ایران
4 - استادیار، گروه روان‌شناسی، واحد مرودشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مرودشت، ایران

تاریخ دریافت : 1399/01/29 تاریخ پذیرش : 1400/07/24 تاریخ انتشار : 1400/05/01

کلید واژه: خلاقیت, مقطع متوسطه, روش تدریس, الگوی خلاقیت در تدریس,

چکیده مقاله :

مقدمه: دانش آموزان پس از تحصیل، معمولا مهارت کافی برای ورود به جامعه را ندارند؛ که در این میان، برخورداری از یک ذهن خلاق، مبتکر و نوآور برای رشد و شکوفایی توانمندی دانش آموزان یک مزیت ارزشمند تلقی می شود.این پژوهش با هدف تهیه وتدوین الگوی یادگیری خلاق در ساختار برنامه درسی آموزش متوسطه شهر شیراز انجام شد.
روش: با استفاده از نمونه ای از صاحب نظران مشغول به کار در 20 مدرسه دولتی شهرستان شیراز (384 نفر) تحقیق حاضر، با هدف تهیه و تدوین الگوی یادگیری خلاق در ساختار برنامه درسی آموزش دوره متوسطه بر روی در سال تحصیلی 98-99 اجرا شد. اعضای نمونه با استفاده از روش نمونه­گیری تصادفی خوشه ای چند مرحله ای انتخاب شدند. روش تحقیق این مطالعه از نوع زمینه یابی بود و در آن، آزمودنی ها به پرسشنامه محقق ساخته 42 سوالی در خصوص الگوی خلاقیت پاسخ دادند؛ از نرم افزار AMOS ویراست 24، برای آزمون برازندگی الگوی پیشنهادی استفاده شد.
یافته­ها: نتایج آزمون های آماری نشان دادند که الگوی خلاقیت در برنامه ریزی درسی شامل شش بعد مجزا (روش تدریس، محتوای درسی، آموزش دهنده، ارزشیابی، محیط فیزیکی و مدیریت) می باشد؛ همچنین، برنامه ریزی درسی دانش آموزان مقطع متوسطه در کشور، با توجه بر رویکرد خلاقیت نیاز به بازنگری دارد.
نتیجه­گیری: این تحقیق الگوی خلاقیت در برنامه ریزی درسی را تدوین نمود و تلویحاتی برای موفقیت در شکوفاسازی خلاقیت دانش آموزان مقطع متوسطه ارائه کرد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

The aim of this study was Developing a creativity learning model in high school educational curriculum. There for, 384 experts (incloud masters, schoole managers, teachers & consoultants) of 20 Shiraz high-schools in 2019-2020 educational year, were randomly selected through multistage cluster sampling. The method of this study was combined from document study to qualitive and quantitive surway methods. After gathering basic data by document study, investigator conducted some interviews by 90 university masters and creativity experts, for quantitive surway phase. Collected 42 items were organized in to a questionnaire by 5 degrees in Likert scale. In qualitive surway phase, data extracted from answered questionnaires by examines, feed to SPSS-26 to do investigative factor analysis. The model fitness and effects of dimitions on principal components were analysed by AMOS-24. The results showed that, there is a six multi-dimitional creativity model (inclouds teaching method, teaching content, theacher, assessing, physical invironment and management); Hence, Iran educational planing needs some modifications by the respect to actualize creativity of High school students. So, it has some implications for improving adolesents creativity skills.

منابع و مأخذ:

1.    KefayatM. Investigating the relationship between parenting methods and attitudes and creativity of first year high school students in Ahvaz. Fars Prov Educ Organ plan Approv by Res Counc. 1995;

2.    Dadgaran SEMM. Identifying the Creativity and Central Competencies of the Managers of Private Newspapers, Radio and Television of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Q J Initiat Creat Humanit. 2016;6(1):175–95.

3.    Jeffrey R, Craft A. The universalization of creativity. 2001 [cited 2021 Oct 1].

4.    Saville G. Emotional intelligence in policing. Police Chief. 2006;73(11):38.

5.    Yaghoubi, A; Bayat A. The relationship between students’ self-esteem of Bu Ali Sina University and their happiness and creativity. J Initiat Creat Humanit. 2012;3.

6.    Moghimi S. Organization and management of a research approach. Tehran: Tehran; 2013.

7.    Moshabaki, A; Hatami, F; Gholamian A. A new look at the concept of conscience of faith (work) in improving the level of productivity of the organization. Econ Manag. 2004;(3).

8.    Niu, W. (2007). Individual and environmental influences... - Google Scholar [Internet]. [cited 2021 Oct 1].

9.    Quintero M. Innovation for Media Content Creation [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2021 Oct 1].

10. Ahmadi A. New teaching-learning methods in geography. Tehran: Shoora Publishing; 1998.

11. Taghipoor ZA. Introduction to educational planning, twenty-fifth edition. 21st ed. Tehran: Agah; 2007.

12. Ahmadi S. Investigating the effect of   problem solving teaching method on fostering the creativity of fifth grade elementary male students. Tehran; 2007.

13. Bruce, A. (2003). Interdisciplinary research journeys:... - Google Scholar [Internet]. [cited 2021 Oct 1].

14. Faizi T. Fundamentals of Management Organization. Tehran: Payame Noor University Press; 2010.

15. Salehi Taleghani F. How to eliminate boredom and boredom of personnel in safety training. Bi-monthly Mag mold makers. 2010;47.

16. Maker CJ, Jo S, Muammar OM. Development of creativity: The influence of varying levels of implementation of the DISCOVER curriculum model, a non-traditional pedagogical approach. Learn Individ Differ. 2008;18(4):402–17.

17. Chen B. Enhance creative performance via exposure to examples: The role of cognitive thinking style. Pers Individ Dif. 2020;154:109663.

18. Jebeliadeh, P; Sobhani A. The effect of using creative teaching methods on the creativity of fourth grade elementary students in Golestan province. J Creat Innov Humanit. 2013;2.

19. Ahmadi, GA; Abdolmaleki S. Investigating the effect of experimental science education based on exploratory approach on creativity and motivation for progress. Innov Creat Humanit. 2013;2(9).

20.Yazdanpour,N;Yousefi,A;Haghani,A. The effect of project and participatory education on the academic achievement of Fooladshahr third experimental female students in statistics and modeling. Research in curriculum planning.2009,23(22):85-98

21. Arvin F. Comparison and effect of participatory learning and speaking methods on creative thinking and academic achievement of third grade female middle school students in Yazd. Yazd; 2013.

22. Gholamian Fard A. Investigating the effect of guided exploratory learning method on strengthening the creative thinking of sixth grade elementary school girls in Qom. Islamic Azad University Tehran; 2015.

23. Poor Salim, Abbas; Zamani, Elahe and Manafi Sharafabad K. The effect of participatory learning on the creative thinking of fifth grade elementary male students in Koohdasht city in the course of experimental sciences. J Thought Child, Inst Humanit Cult Stud. 2015;5(1).

24. Ismaili, E; Mousavi F. Comparison between participatory learning teaching method through e-learning environment with lecture method on students’ creativity and academic achievement. In: Third National Conference on Sustainable Development in Educational Sciences and Psychology, Social and Cultural Studies. Tehran; 2016.

25. Rahimimand M, in AAP-J of I and C, 2015  undefined. The effects of employing new teaching methods on creativity and academic achievement of students. journal.bpj.ir [Internet].

26. Abdul Tajdini, P; Delavar, A; Ahadi, H; Bahrami H. ). Introducing the method of teaching creativity and evaluating its effect on creative thinking in comparison with the methods of teaching creativity and brainwashing. Sci J Educ Eval. 2018;(9):36.

27. Dehghan Manshadi F. A comparative study of the effectiveness of participatory learning teaching methods and lectures on the creativity and entrepreneurial spirit of female high school students in District 1 of Yazd. Imam Javad Institute of Higher Education; 2018.

28. Niknam, K; Ghobari Bonab H. The effect of creative problem solving training on creativity and life satisfaction of gifted male students. Q J Child Ment Heal. 2019;6(2).

29. Said-Metwaly S, … EK-TS and, 2020  undefined. The factor structure of the Verbal Torrance Test of Creative Thinking in an Arabic context: Classical test theory and multidimensional item response theory analyses. Elsevier [Internet]. [cited 2021 Oct 1].

30. Jahromi, N.J; Mardukhi, M.S; Koordmirza E. The effectiveness of social skills training on the creativity of elementary boys in Shiraz. J New Dev Behav Sci. 2019;4(33):24–40.

31. Saleh Rad, R; Afzal Khani, M; Alipoor V. The effectiveness of a literacy-based educational program on the creativity of primary school students in Karaj. Inf Commun Technol Educ Sci. 2008;(3).

32. Salakhatdinova L, Palei T. Training programs on creativity and creative program solving at Russian universities. Procedia-Social Behav Sci. 2015;191:2710–5.

33. Sharifi, A.K; Davari R. Comparison of the effect of three methods of fostering creativity in increasing the creativity of second grade middle school students. Iran J Psychiatry Clin Psychol. 2009;15.

34. Fast L, Lewis J, Bryant M, … KB-J of, 2010  undefined. Does math self-efficacy mediate the effect of the perceived classroom environment on standardized math test performance? psycnet.apa.org [Internet]. [cited 2021 Oct 1].

35. Lahuni S. Educational design of Persian lessons based on the exploratory learning teaching model for the academic progress of children with reading and spelling disorders. , Islamic Azad University of Kermanshah; 2014.

36. Hosseini, S.MH; Matoor M. Designing, compiling and validating a collaborative learning guide model for the “Read and Write Persian” curriculum for elementary school. Educ Innov Q. 2014;46:10–50.

37. Afzal Khani, M; Naderi, E.A; Shariatmadar, A; Seif Naraghi M. The structure of Iranian secondary education curriculum planning from the perspective of professors and curriculum planning specialists in order to design a guiding model for fostering students’ creativity. Islam Azad Univ Educ Leadersh Q. 2015;1:9–36.

38. Shabani H. Educational skills. 21st ed. Tehran: Samt; 2004.

39. Geissler G, Edison S, Pedagogies JW-J of I, 2012  undefined. Improving Students’ Critical Thinking, Creativity, and Communication Skills. ERIC [Internet].

40. McIivenny, L. (2013). Critical and creative thinking... - Google Scholar.

41. Shahbazi, Shirin and Baqeli J. Investigating the concept of creativity and the need to change curricula in order to develop it. In: 3rd International Conference on Psychology, Educational Sciences and Lifestyle. Tehran; 2016.

42. Saif A. Modern Educational Psychology. 5th ed. Tehran: Nashrdoran; 2011.

43. Zarei Matin H. creativity and innovation. Manag Knowl Q. 2017;24(9):59–66.

44. Rahimimand M, Abbas Pour A. The effects of employing new teaching methods on creativity and academic achievement of students. J Innov Creat Hum Sci. 2015;4(4):119–42.

45. Toni, Noor Ali and Yousefi R. Comparison of the effect of participatory teaching method based on group discussion and explanatory teaching method based on direct control on the academic achievement of students in pre-university centers. J Yazd Cent Study Dev Med Educ. 2014;8(4):12.