رابطه بین میزان مشارکت دبیران در اداره مدارس و کارآئی آنها در شهر مرند
محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت بازرگانیداوود حسینی نسب 1 , سهراب خیری دارابی 2
1 - استاد گروه روانشناسی، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران
2 - کارشناس ارشد مدیریت آموزشی
کلید واژه: مدیریت, مشارکت, کارآئی, مدیریت مشارکت جویانه,
چکیده مقاله :
تحقیق حاضر با هدف کلی تعیین رابطه بین سبک مدیریت مشارکتی با کارآئی دبیران مقطع متوسطه شهر مرند انجام شده است. اهداف ویژه عبارتند از: تعیین میزان، مشارکت دبیران زن و مرد در اداره مدارس از دید آنها، تعیین مشارکت دبیران در امور مدرسه با توجه به جنس مدیر، مشارکت دبیران با توجه به تحصیلات آنها. روش تحقیق از نوع توصیفی و همبستگی می باشد، جامعه آماری تحقیق شامل کلیه دبیران و مدیران زن و مرد مقطع متوسطه شهر مرند بوده‌اند که به روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی ساده انتخاب شده اند که حجم نمونه شامل 76 مدیر و 304 دبیر می باشد. برای جمع‌آوری اطلاعات دو نوع پرسش‌نامة جداگانه برای دبیران و مدیران تهیه گردید که روایی آنها بوسیله متخصصین و برای پایائی از روش آلفای کرونباخ استفاده گردید (پرسش‌نامه دبیران 80/0 و پرسش‌نامه مدیران 86/0 محاسبه گردید). تحلیل ها بوسیله نرم‌افزار آماری SPSS Version 9 و با استفاده از آزمونهای همبستگی پیرسون، T-test و آنالیز واریانس یکطرفه (ANOVA) صورت گرفت. نتایج حاصل از آزمونهای آماری نشان داد: 1- بین میزان مشارکت دبیران مرد و کارآئی آنها رابطه معنی‌داری وجود ندارد. 2- بین میزان مشارکت دبیران زن و کارآئی آنها رابطه معنی‌داری وجود دارد. 3- میزان مشارکت دبیران در امور مدرسه با توجه به جنس دبیر متفاوت نیست. 4-میزان مشارکت دادن دبیران در امور مدرسه با توجه به جنس مدیر متفاوت نیست. 5- میزان مشارکت دبیران با توجه به تحصیلات آنها متفاوت نیست. باتوجه به نتایج تحقیق بین میزان مشارکت دبیران در اداره مدارس و کارآئی آنها رابطه مستقیم وجود دارد، بنابراین به مدیران مدارس پیشنهاد می‌شود دبیران تحت سرپرستی خود را بیشتر در امور مدرسه مشارکت دهند، چون بی شک گره‌گشای بیشتر مسایل مدرسه خواهند بود.
The general purpose of this paper is to determine the relationship between the degree of participation of the teachers in the school management and the high school teachers’ efficiency in Marand. The Specific purposes of this paper are: to find out the teachers’ participation rate in school management according to their perspective, determining the managers (man and woman), participatory management style, and their efficiency. The research method is descriptive. The statistical population were Marand high school teachers and managers and the sampling method was simple random sampling.The sample number consisted of 76 managers and 304 teachers. Two separate questionnaires were used for teachers and managers. Specialists’ opinions have been used to determine the validity and Cronbach method has been used to determine the reliability rate of the questionnaires. The teachers’ questionnaire validity rate was calculated 80 percent and the managers’ questionnaire validity rate was 86 percent. The results were analyzed by SPSS statistical software version 9 and Pearson correlation test, T–test and ANOVA (unilateral variance analysis). In this paper, five questions were designed,and the statistical test results were: There is not a meaningful relationship between male teachers’ participation rate and their efficiency. There is a meaningful relationship between female teachers’ participation rate and their efficiency. Teachers participation rate regarding the teacher’s gender is not different. Teachers’ participation rate regarding the manager’s gender is not different. Teachers’ participation rate regarding their education is not different. According to this paper results, there is a direct relationship between the teachers’ participation rate in school and their efficiency. So it is suggested that school managers involve the teachers more in their school management because they will be a great help in solving many school problems. Finally, practical suggestions and guidelines are presented.
The Holy Qur'an, Surah Al-Imran, Verse 159, (In Persian).
Abbaszadegan, M. (1994). Schools and Foundations of Management. Tehran: Publishing Company, (In Persian).
Alagheband, A. (2000). The Basics of Educational Management. Tehran: Payame Noor Publication, (In Persian).
Amini, D. (1996). Investigating the Relationship between Participatory Management and Increasing the Efficiency and Productivity of Employees. Master Thesis, Ghaemshahr: Islamic Azad University, (In Persian).
Anthony, W. (1978). Participative Management. Florida State University.
Arthars. R. (1985). Dictionarty of Psychology, N. J: Prentice-Hall.
Behrangi, M. R. (2003). Educational and Institution Management. Tehran: Kamale Tarbiyat Publication, (In Persian).
Boroumand, Z. (1995). Organizational Behavior Management. Tehran: Payame Noor University Press, (In Persian).
Fattahi Sarand, V. (2006). Evaluation of Efficiency of Major Units of Islamic Azad universities in a Province. East, Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Master's Thesis, Tabriz: Islamic Azad University, (In Persian).
Hamedi Zare, B. (2004). A Study on the Educational Efficiency of Part-Time Teachers with Official Secretaries at the Secondary School of Tabriz. Master Thesis, (In Persian).
Hoy, K. W., & Sweethland, R. S., & Smith, A. (2002). Toward an Organizational Model of Achivement in High Schools the Significance of Collective Efficacy. Edcutional Administration Quarlerly, 38(1).
Irannezhad Parizi, M., & Sasan Gohar, P. (1992). Organization and Management from Theory to Practice. Tehran: Iran Banking Institute, (In Persian).
Monzavi Sani, F. (2005). The Effect of Participatory Management on Productivity and Organizational Efficiency in Sari Telecommunication Company. Master's Thesis, Sari: Islamic Azad University, (In Persian).
Paull, H., & Kenneth, H. B. (1972). Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing HymanResources. Prentic-Hall Inc.
Pour Anvari, S. (2004). A Survey and Comparison of the Performance of Educational Managers with Participatory and Non-Participatory Style in Secondary and Secondary Schools in Maragheh, Master Thesis, (In Persian).
Saadat, E. (1993). Decision-making Process in Organization. Tehran: Tehran University Press, (In Persian).
Sabri, Q. (1999). Effective Factors on the Participatory Management and its Role in Teachers' Efficiency, from the Viewpoint of Teachers and Primary Managers in Marand City. Master Thesis, Tehran: Government Education Training Center, (In Persian).
Sadegh Birjani, S. (2006). The Study of the Role of Personnel Training on their Performance at Islamic Azad University. Tabriz: Islamic Azad University, (In Persian).
Saiyadain, M. S. (2003). Organizational Bbehavior. USA: Mc Graw-Hill.
Seyyed Marandi, F. (2002). The role of Participatory Management in Increasing the Efficiency of Marand Primary Teachers. Master's Thesis, Tehran: State Education Management Center, (In Persian).
Zomoradiyan, A. (1992). Participatory Management, Day Management. Interview, Educational Journal, Management News, 7, (In Persian).
_||_
The Holy Qur'an, Surah Al-Imran, Verse 159, (In Persian).
Abbaszadegan, M. (1994). Schools and Foundations of Management. Tehran: Publishing Company, (In Persian).
Alagheband, A. (2000). The Basics of Educational Management. Tehran: Payame Noor Publication, (In Persian).
Amini, D. (1996). Investigating the Relationship between Participatory Management and Increasing the Efficiency and Productivity of Employees. Master Thesis, Ghaemshahr: Islamic Azad University, (In Persian).
Anthony, W. (1978). Participative Management. Florida State University.
Arthars. R. (1985). Dictionarty of Psychology, N. J: Prentice-Hall.
Behrangi, M. R. (2003). Educational and Institution Management. Tehran: Kamale Tarbiyat Publication, (In Persian).
Boroumand, Z. (1995). Organizational Behavior Management. Tehran: Payame Noor University Press, (In Persian).
Fattahi Sarand, V. (2006). Evaluation of Efficiency of Major Units of Islamic Azad universities in a Province. East, Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Master's Thesis, Tabriz: Islamic Azad University, (In Persian).
Hamedi Zare, B. (2004). A Study on the Educational Efficiency of Part-Time Teachers with Official Secretaries at the Secondary School of Tabriz. Master Thesis, (In Persian).
Hoy, K. W., & Sweethland, R. S., & Smith, A. (2002). Toward an Organizational Model of Achivement in High Schools the Significance of Collective Efficacy. Edcutional Administration Quarlerly, 38(1).
Irannezhad Parizi, M., & Sasan Gohar, P. (1992). Organization and Management from Theory to Practice. Tehran: Iran Banking Institute, (In Persian).
Monzavi Sani, F. (2005). The Effect of Participatory Management on Productivity and Organizational Efficiency in Sari Telecommunication Company. Master's Thesis, Sari: Islamic Azad University, (In Persian).
Paull, H., & Kenneth, H. B. (1972). Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing HymanResources. Prentic-Hall Inc.
Pour Anvari, S. (2004). A Survey and Comparison of the Performance of Educational Managers with Participatory and Non-Participatory Style in Secondary and Secondary Schools in Maragheh, Master Thesis, (In Persian).
Saadat, E. (1993). Decision-making Process in Organization. Tehran: Tehran University Press, (In Persian).
Sabri, Q. (1999). Effective Factors on the Participatory Management and its Role in Teachers' Efficiency, from the Viewpoint of Teachers and Primary Managers in Marand City. Master Thesis, Tehran: Government Education Training Center, (In Persian).
Sadegh Birjani, S. (2006). The Study of the Role of Personnel Training on their Performance at Islamic Azad University. Tabriz: Islamic Azad University, (In Persian).
Saiyadain, M. S. (2003). Organizational Bbehavior. USA: Mc Graw-Hill.
Seyyed Marandi, F. (2002). The role of Participatory Management in Increasing the Efficiency of Marand Primary Teachers. Master's Thesis, Tehran: State Education Management Center, (In Persian).
Zomoradiyan, A. (1992). Participatory Management, Day Management. Interview, Educational Journal, Management News, 7, (In Persian).