• صفحه اصلی
  • تولید بیوگاز از ضایعات کارخانه چغندرقند در یک سیستم فرا انباشته با تنظیم pH

اشتراک گذاری

آدرس مقاله


کد مقاله : JEST-1704-3479 (R3) بازدید : 203 صفحه: 15 - 24

10.22034/jest.2021.25836.3479

نوع مقاله: پژوهشی

تولید بیوگاز از ضایعات کارخانه چغندرقند در یک سیستم فرا انباشته با تنظیم pH

محورهای موضوعی : انرژی های تجدید پذیر

میثاق کرامتی 1 , حسین بیکی 2

1 - کارشناسی ارشد، گروه مهندسی شیمی، دانشگاه صنعتی قوچان، قوچان، ایران.
2 - استادیار گروه مهندسی شیمی، دانشگاه صنعتی قوچان، قوچان، ایران.*(مسوول مکاتبات)

تاریخ دریافت : 1396/01/12 تاریخ پذیرش : 1396/08/03 تاریخ انتشار : 1399/07/01

کلید واژه: تنظیم pH, بیوگاز, هضم بی‌هوازی, ضایعات چغندر قند,

چکیده مقاله :

زمینه و هدف: با توجه به اهمیت حفظ محیط زیست و ضرورت استفاده از انرژی های نو، در این پژوهش با استفاده از یک بیوراکتور ناپیوسته تولید گاز متان از ضایعات کارخانه چغندر قند مورد بررسی آزمایشگاهی قرار گرفته است. روش بررسی: آزمایش ها به کمک یک حمام آبگرم در دمای ثابت oC 37 انجام می شوند. چهار راکتور با ورودی های یکسان در حمام آبگرم بارگذاری شده است. در چهار راکتور همه پارامتر ها ثابت است و تنها pH راکتورها در چهار روز آغازین بر روی مقادیر 7، 8 و 9 ثابت نگه داشته می شود. نسبت سوبسترا به ماده تلقیحی مورد استفاده در راکتورها 6 به 1 (6:1) می باشد. یافته ها: در یک سیستم فراانباشته با نسبت بسیار بالای سوبسترا به ماده تلقیحی، به دلیل افت شدید pH نمی توان انتظار تولید بیوگاز داشت. در حالی که به کمک تنظیم pH می توان حتی برای چنین سیستمی به تولید بیوگاز رسید، اگر چه راندمان سیستم پایین می آید. بحث و نتیجه گیری: نتایج آزمایش ها نشان دادند که با تنظیم و کنترل pH در راکتورها، حتی در شرایط نسبت بسیار بالای سوبسترا:ماده تلقیحی، متان با غلظت بین 35 تا 50 تولید می شود. تولید بیوگاز در راکتورها با تاخیر زمانی زیادی همراه بود، به طوری که تا چهاردهمین روز گاز تولیدی ناچیز بود. راکتور تنظیم شده درpH برابر با 8، حجم بیوگاز بیش تری تولید می کند. این در حالی است که گاز حاصله از راکتور تنظیم شده در pH برابر با 9 از خلوص متان بالاتری برخوردار است.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Background and Objective: Considering the importance of environmental protection and necessity of using new energy sources and innovative fuels, in this study, biogas production from sugar beet wastes using a batch lab-scale bioreactor was investigated experimentally. Method: All experiments were done at constant temperature of 37±1 oC with using water bath. Four reactors with the same feed concentration and condition put in a circulated water bath. pH was adjusted in the reactors for the first 4 days on 7, 8 and 9. Substrate to inoculum (S/I) ratio in the reactors was constant and equal to 6:1. Finding: In the over load mono-digester system with high S/I ratio, due to the sharp drop in pH, biogas couldn’t be produced. By adjusting the pH, even for such a system, biogas production can be achieved, although the efficiency of the process is low.  Discussion and Conclusion: The results revealed that, whilst biogas was not produced in the reactor with high S/I ratio, pH adjustment made it possible to generate biogas. Mole fraction of methane in biogas produced in the reactors with pH adjustment were 35-50%. Biogas production occurred with long time delay, so that after 14 days, very little or no biogas was produced. Maximum volume of biogas was produced in reactor with pH=8. Whilst in the reactor with pH=9, biogas produced with high methane purity.  

منابع و مأخذ:


  1. Syndicate, I.S.F. Iranian Sugar Factories Syndicate. 2015  [cited 2015; Available from: www.isfs.ir.
    2.
  2. Beiki, H., M. Dadvar, R. Halladj, 2009, Pore network model for catalytic dehydration of methanol at particle level, AIChE Journal. Vol. 55(2), pp. 442-449.
    3.
  3. Beiki, H., Keramati, M., 2019, Improvement of methane production from sugar beet wastes using TiO2 and Fe3O4 nanoparticles and chitosan micropowder additives, Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Vol. 189, pp. 13-25.
    4.
  4. Aboudi, K., Álvarez-Gallego, C.J, Romero-García, L.I., 2015, Improvement of exhausted sugar beet cossettes anaerobic digestion process by co-digestion with pig manure, Energy & Fuels, Vol. 29(2), pp. 754-762.
    5.
  5. Alkaya, E., Demirer, G.N., 2011, Anaerobic mesophilic co-digestion of sugar-beet processing wastewater and beet-pulp in batch reactors, Renewable Energy, Vol. 36(3), pp. 971-975.
    6.
  6. Keramati, M., Beiki, H., 2017, The effect of pH adjustment together with different substrate to inoculum ratios on biogas production from sugar beet wastes in an anaerobic digester,Journal of Energy Management and Technology, Vol. 1(2), pp. 6-11.
    7.
  7. Hutnan, M., Drtil, M., Mrafkova, L., 2000, Anaerobic biodegradation of sugar beet pulp, Biodegradation, Vol. 11(4), pp. 203-211.
    8.
  8. Montañés, R., Solera, R., Pérez, M., 2015, Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and sugar beet pulp lixiviation in batch reactors: effect of temperature, Bioresource technology, Vol. 180,pp. 177-184.
    9.
  9. Yang, L, Huang, Y., Zhao, M., Huang, Zh., Miao, H., Xu, Zh., Ruan, W., 2015, Enhancing biogas generation performance from food wastes by high-solids thermophilic anaerobic digestion: Effect of pH adjustment, International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, Vol. 105, pp. 153-159.
    10.
  10. Chen, X., Yan, W., Sheng, K., Sanati, M., 2014, Comparison of high-solids to liquid anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and green waste, Bioresource technology, Vol. 154, pp. 215-221.
    11.
  11. Demirel, B., Scherer, P., 2008, Production of methane from sugar beet silage without manure addition by a single-stage anaerobic digestion process,Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 32(3), pp. 203-209.
    12.
  12. Suhartini, S., Heaven, S., Banks, C. J., 2014, Comparison of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of sugar beet pulp: performance, dewaterability and foam control, Bioresource technology. Vol. 152, pp. 202-211.
    13.
  13. Federation, W.E., 2005, Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, American Public Health Association (APHA): Washington, DC, USA.
    14.
  14. Liu, C. f., Yuan, X., Zeng, G., Li, W., Li, J., 2008, Prediction of methane yield at optimum pH for anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste, Bioresource Technology, Vol. 99(4), pp. 882-888.
    15.
  15. Yuan, H., Chen, Y., Zhang, H., Jiang, S., Zhou, Q., Gu, G., 2006, Improved bioproduction of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) from excess sludge under alkaline conditions, Environmental science & technology, Vol. 40(6), pp. 2025-2029.
    16.
  16. Izumi, K., Okishio, Y., Nagao, N., Niwa, Ch., Yamamoto, Sh., Toda, T., 2010, Effects of particle size on anaerobic digestion of food waste, International biodeterioration & biodegradation, Vol. 64(7), pp. 601-608.
    17.
  17. Wang, K., Yin, J., Shen, D., Li, N., 2014, Anaerobic digestion of food waste for volatile fatty acids (VFAs) production with different types of inoculum: effect of pH,Bioresource technology, Vol. 161, pp. 395-401.
    18.
  18. Hutnan, M., Drtil, M., Derco, J., Mrafkova, L., Hornak, M., Mico, S., 2001, Two-Step Pilot-Scale Anaerobic Treatment of Sugar Beet Pulp, Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 237-243
    19.
  19. Suhartini, S., Heaven, S., Banks, C. J., 2014, Comparison of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of sugar beet pulp: Performance, dewaterability and foam control, Bioresource Technology, Vol. 152, pp. 202–211.
    20.

 

 

_||_

  1. Syndicate, I.S.F. Iranian Sugar Factories Syndicate. 2015  [cited 2015; Available from: www.isfs.ir.
    2.
  2. Beiki, H., M. Dadvar, R. Halladj, 2009, Pore network model for catalytic dehydration of methanol at particle level, AIChE Journal. Vol. 55(2), pp. 442-449.
    3.
  3. Beiki, H., Keramati, M., 2019, Improvement of methane production from sugar beet wastes using TiO2 and Fe3O4 nanoparticles and chitosan micropowder additives, Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Vol. 189, pp. 13-25.
    4.
  4. Aboudi, K., Álvarez-Gallego, C.J, Romero-García, L.I., 2015, Improvement of exhausted sugar beet cossettes anaerobic digestion process by co-digestion with pig manure, Energy & Fuels, Vol. 29(2), pp. 754-762.
    5.
  5. Alkaya, E., Demirer, G.N., 2011, Anaerobic mesophilic co-digestion of sugar-beet processing wastewater and beet-pulp in batch reactors, Renewable Energy, Vol. 36(3), pp. 971-975.
    6.
  6. Keramati, M., Beiki, H., 2017, The effect of pH adjustment together with different substrate to inoculum ratios on biogas production from sugar beet wastes in an anaerobic digester,Journal of Energy Management and Technology, Vol. 1(2), pp. 6-11.
    7.
  7. Hutnan, M., Drtil, M., Mrafkova, L., 2000, Anaerobic biodegradation of sugar beet pulp, Biodegradation, Vol. 11(4), pp. 203-211.
    8.
  8. Montañés, R., Solera, R., Pérez, M., 2015, Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and sugar beet pulp lixiviation in batch reactors: effect of temperature, Bioresource technology, Vol. 180,pp. 177-184.
    9.
  9. Yang, L, Huang, Y., Zhao, M., Huang, Zh., Miao, H., Xu, Zh., Ruan, W., 2015, Enhancing biogas generation performance from food wastes by high-solids thermophilic anaerobic digestion: Effect of pH adjustment, International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, Vol. 105, pp. 153-159.
    10.
  10. Chen, X., Yan, W., Sheng, K., Sanati, M., 2014, Comparison of high-solids to liquid anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and green waste, Bioresource technology, Vol. 154, pp. 215-221.
    11.
  11. Demirel, B., Scherer, P., 2008, Production of methane from sugar beet silage without manure addition by a single-stage anaerobic digestion process,Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 32(3), pp. 203-209.
    12.
  12. Suhartini, S., Heaven, S., Banks, C. J., 2014, Comparison of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of sugar beet pulp: performance, dewaterability and foam control, Bioresource technology. Vol. 152, pp. 202-211.
    13.
  13. Federation, W.E., 2005, Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, American Public Health Association (APHA): Washington, DC, USA.
    14.
  14. Liu, C. f., Yuan, X., Zeng, G., Li, W., Li, J., 2008, Prediction of methane yield at optimum pH for anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste, Bioresource Technology, Vol. 99(4), pp. 882-888.
    15.
  15. Yuan, H., Chen, Y., Zhang, H., Jiang, S., Zhou, Q., Gu, G., 2006, Improved bioproduction of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) from excess sludge under alkaline conditions, Environmental science & technology, Vol. 40(6), pp. 2025-2029.
    16.
  16. Izumi, K., Okishio, Y., Nagao, N., Niwa, Ch., Yamamoto, Sh., Toda, T., 2010, Effects of particle size on anaerobic digestion of food waste, International biodeterioration & biodegradation, Vol. 64(7), pp. 601-608.
    17.
  17. Wang, K., Yin, J., Shen, D., Li, N., 2014, Anaerobic digestion of food waste for volatile fatty acids (VFAs) production with different types of inoculum: effect of pH,Bioresource technology, Vol. 161, pp. 395-401.
    18.
  18. Hutnan, M., Drtil, M., Derco, J., Mrafkova, L., Hornak, M., Mico, S., 2001, Two-Step Pilot-Scale Anaerobic Treatment of Sugar Beet Pulp, Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 237-243
    19.
  19. Suhartini, S., Heaven, S., Banks, C. J., 2014, Comparison of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of sugar beet pulp: Performance, dewaterability and foam control, Bioresource Technology, Vol. 152, pp. 202–211.
    20.

 

 

مقالات مرتبط

حقوق این وب‌سایت متعلق به سامانه مدیریت نشریات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی است.
حق نشر © 1403-1400

صفحه اصلی| عضویت/ ورود| درباره سند| تماس با ما|
[English] [العربية] [en] [ar]