طراحی چارچوب نظری مدارس امن در آموزش و پرورش ایران: یک پژوهش کیفی
محورهای موضوعی : آموزش و پرورشمنصوره کشوری 1 , محبوبه سلیمانپور عمران 2 , بهرنگ اسماعیلی شاد 3
1 - دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، واحد بجنورد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بجنورد، ایران .
2 - استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد بجنورد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،بجنورد، ایران.
3 - استادیار، گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد بجنورد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بجنورد، ایران.
کلید واژه: تحلیل مضمون, مدرسه امن-آموزش و پرورش-مولفههای روانشناختی- جسمانی, مولفههای آموزشی- درسی,
چکیده مقاله :
مقدمه و هدف: هدف از این پژوهش، بررسی و شناسایی مؤلفههای مدارس امن بود که به عنوان یک راهنما برای مدیران مدارس و تصمیمگیرندگان حوزه آموزش و پرورش قابل استفاده باشد.
روش شناسی پژوهش: پژوهش به شیوه کیفی و با استفاده از روش تحلیل مضمون انجام شد. گردآوری دادهها و استخراج مضامین مرتبط با استفاده از مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته با آگاهیدهندگان کلیدی در این حوزه صورت گرفت. انتخاب مشارکتکنندگان با استفاده از روش نمونهگیری هدفمند و معیار اشباع نظری بود که بر اساس آن تعداد 15 نفر از اساتید و متخصصان حوزه آموزش و پرورش و متخصصان معماری انتخاب شدند. برای به دست آوردن اعتبار و روایی دادهها از دو روش بازبینی مشارکتکنندگان و مرور خبرگان غیر شرکتکننده در پژوهش استفاده شد. دادهها به روش تحلیل مضمون بررسی شدند.
یافتهها: مدلی برای مدارس امن با دو دسته مولفهی اصلی تحت عنوان 1- مولفههای روانشناختی- جسمانی با مضامین سازماندهنده: امنیت روانی، امنیت جسمی، امنیت رفتاری، امنیت اجتماعی؛ با 17 مضمون پایه و 4 مضمون سازماندهنده و 2- مولفههای آموزشی- درسی با مضامین سازماندهنده: امنیت فیزیکی، امنیت رفاهی و امنیت آموزشی با 3 مضمون سازماندهنده و 8 مضمون پایه شناسایی و ماتریس مضامین مرتبط ترسیم گردید
بحث و نتیجهگیری: . با کاربرد مؤلفههای مدارس امن، دانشآموزان میتوانند به دور از دغدغههای جسمی، روانی و... و هم چنین مشکلات رفاهی و دشواریهای ناشی از امکانات و تجهیزات، درگیر در بحث و یادگیری باشند.
Introduction:
The purpose of this study was to investigate and identify the components of safe schools that can be used as a guide for school principals and decision makers in the field of education. The research was conducted qualitatively using content analysis method
research methodology:
Data were collected and related topics were extracted using semi-structured interviews with experts in this field. Participants were selected using purposive sampling method and theoretical saturation criteria, based on which 15 professors and specialists in the field of education and architecture were selected. To obtain data validity and validity, two methods of reviewing participants and reviewing non-participating experts in the research were used. Data were analyzed by content analysis.
Findings:
A model for safe schools with two main components called 1- Psychological-physical components with organizing themes: mental security, physical security, behavioral security, social security; With 17 basic themes and 4 organizing themes and 2- educational-curricular components with organizing themes: Physical security, welfare security and educational security with 3 organizing themes and 8 basic themes identified and matched the related themes.
Conclusion:
by using the components of safe schools in schools, students can engage in discussion and learning away from physical, psychological, etc., as well as welfare problems and difficulties caused by facilities and equipment.
1.Ali Mohammadi, R., Soleimani, M. (2013). Status of schools in Marand city based on the components of safe schools, Quarterly Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 7 (2): 24-48. [in Persian]
2.Azemati, H., Nowruzian Maleki, S., Khan Wali, N. (2014). Identifying the effective factors in creating physical safety of primary school educational spaces. Education Technology (Technology and Education), 10 (2): 91-100. [in Persian]
3.Bonell, C., Blakemore, S. (2019). Role theory of schools and adolescent health. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 3(10):742-748.
4.Carden, C. (2019). ‘Fiddling with young kiddies’ minds’: reporting on the Safe Schools Coalition in Australia. Continuum, 33(3): 297-309.
5.Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. 4th Edition. Boston: Pearson Publication.
6.Gallan, B., Dawes, K., & Thomas, S. J. (2020). Medical student perceptions of physical and emotional safety before and after 5-week mental health placements. Australasian psychiatry, 28(2): 229-234.
7.Gravitt, S. H. (2017). The School Resource Officer: An Analysis of School Security, Safety and Climate (Doctoral dissertation), London.
8.Henshaw, P. (2019). Relationships and health education. Head teacher Update, 4 (2): 35-35.
Johns, M. M., Poteat, V. P., Horn, S. S., & Kosciw, J. (2019). Strengthening our schools to promote resilience and health among LGBTQ youth: Emerging evidence and research priorities from The State of LGBTQ Youth Health and Wellbeing Symposium. LGBT health, 6(4): 146-155.
9.Lee, S. M., Miller, G. F., Brener, N., Michael, S., Jones, S. E., Leroy, Z., & Barrios, L. (2019). Practices that support and sustain health in schools: An analysis of SHPPS data. Journal of School Health, 89(4): 279-299.
10.Luthar, S. S., Kumar, N. L., & Zillmer, N. (2020). Teachers’ responsibilities for students’ mental health: Challenges in high achieving schools. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 8(2): 119-130.
11.Mahdiun, R., Pahang, N., & Yariqli, b. (2018). Identifying the factors affecting the quality of schools and examining its current status: Combined research. School Management, 5 (1): 173-193. [in Persian]
12.Maleki, H. (2009). Improving the level of public safety in schools is an unknown necessity for the cooperation of law enforcement agencies and education. Journal of Law Enforcement Order and Security, 2 (1): 1-28. [in Persian]
13.Mirghfouri, H., Shabani, Akram, Mohammadi, Kh., & Mansouri, S. (2015). Identifying and ranking the factors affecting the improvement of the quality of educational services using the integrated fuzzy approach. Education and Evaluation, 9 (34): 13-33. [in Persian]
14.Paez, G. R. (2016). Bullying Prevention in New York City Public Schools: School Safety Agents' Perceptions of Their Roles. Sage press.
15.Randall, P. W. (2019). Teacher stress in rural schools: A phenomenological study on stress and its effect on teacher-perceived physical and mental well-being. Order, (13885013).
16.Reupert, A. (2019). Mental Health and Academic Learning in Schools: Approaches for Facilitating the Wellbeing of Children and Young People. New York.
17.Roche, M. K., & Strobach, K. V. (2019). Nine Elements of Effective School Community Partnerships to Address Student Mental Health, Physical Health, and Overall Wellness. Coalition for Community Schools Rutledge press.
18.Turner, B. (2018). Safe and Civil Schools: The Study of Middle School Students Perception of Their Safety and the Effects of a School Safety Program, Ph. D Dissertation, Tribeca Nazarene University.
19.West, K. Mutter, R. (2019). Utilization of mental health services in educational setting by adolescents in the United States. Journal of School Health, 89(5): 393-401.
20.Wierenga, A. (2017). Safety and Security of an Arizona Public High School: Security Experiences with an SRO Onsite (Doctoral dissertation, north central University).
21.Wiest, C., & Lee, C. (2019). Mental Health Considerations and Options for Schools. Can We Ensure Safe Schools?: A Collaborative Guide on Focused Strategies for School Safety, 61.With In Indiana Public Schools, Ph. D dissertation, Indiana State University Terre Haute, Indiana.
_||_