Rereading the 1990 Rudbar-Manjil Earthquake Recovery through Oral Historical Narratives

Subject Areas : Built Environment

Mahsa Bashiri ^{1 *} , Ameneh Karimian ² , Seyed Amirhossein Garakani ³ , Mitra Hashemi ⁴ , Farnaz Garousi ⁵

1 - Assistant professor, post-disaster reconstruction and rehabilitation research group, Natural Disasters Research Institute (NDRI), Tehran, Iran.
2 - Researcher, post-disaster reconstruction and rehabilitation research group, Natural Disasters Research Institute (NDRI), Tehran, Iran.
3 - Department of Architecture, CT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
4 - Researcher, post-disaster reconstruction and rehabilitation research group, Natural Disasters Research Institute (NDRI), Tehran, Iran.
5 - Researcher, post-disaster reconstruction and rehabilitation research group, Natural Disasters Research Institute (NDRI), Tehran, Iran.

Received: 2025-07-19 Accepted : 2025-10-01 Published : 2025-10-09

Keywords: Oral History, Disaster Recovery, Post-Disaster Reconstruction, Earthquake, Iran,

Abstract :

Iran is one of the most hazard-prone and vulnerable countries to disasters, with recurrent earthquakes causing severe human and economic losses. Yet, recovery has often been shaped by emergency-driven decisions, inadequate documentation, and weak institutional memory. The 1990 Rudbar-Manjil earthquake, the first major disaster to occur after the Islamic Revolution, marked a turning point in disaster management and reconstruction history. While significant, most existing studies have centered on official perspectives, overlooking the lived experiences of affected populations and practitioners. This study addresses that gap by revisiting the earthquake through oral history to preserve intangible heritage and extract lessons for future recovery. Using a qualitative approach, 63 semi-structured interviews were conducted with officials, decision-makers, and residents between July 2021 and February 2022. Purposive and snowball sampling were used to identify participants until data saturation was achieved. Transcriptions were systematically coded and thematically analyzed. This process produced a multi-perspective narrative of recovery, revealing both achievements and enduring challenges across institutional, social, and community dimensions. The Rudbar–Manjil case shows that durable disaster recovery depends on preparedness, effective governance, and community engagement. Preparedness requires pre-disaster frameworks and a process-oriented approach linking response and recovery. Strong governance relies on streamlined, transparent institutions, inter-agency coordination, and systematic information management. Embedding risk reduction throughout recovery ensures sustainability. Ultimately, community involvement is crucial: striking a balance between local participation and technical oversight enhances legitimacy and resilience. Addressing technical, institutional, and social dimensions together creates more effective and enduring recovery outcomes.

References:

AIDR. (2020). National principles for disaster recovery. https://knowledge.aidr.org.au/resources/national-principles-for-disaster-recovery/
Alizamani, M. Z., Hossein; Joodi, Majid. (2007). A comparative comparison of 1990 Gilan and Zanjan earthquake reconstruction management and 2003 earthquake Bam (in Persian). The 3rd International Conference on the Comprehensive Crisis Management in Natural Disasters, Tehran, Iran.
Allali, S. A., Abed, M., & Mebarki, A. (2018). Post-earthquake assessment of buildings damage using fuzzy logic. Engineering Structures, 166, 117–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.055
Amini Hosseini, K. (2009). Investigating the effectiveness of the crisis management system in Manjil, Avaj, Bam, and Silakhor earthquakes.
Bank, W. (2015/2017). Disaster Recovery Guidance Series: Housing and Settlements Recovery. https://www.gfdrr.org/sites/default/files/2017-09/Housing%20and%20Settlements%20Guidance%20Note.pdf
Brooks, S. K., Dunn, R., Amlôt, R., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J. (2016). Social and occupational factors associated with psychological distress and disorder among disaster responders: a systematic review. BMC psychology, 4(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-016-0120-9
Brooks, S. K., Rogers, M. B., Wessely, S., Patel, S. S., & Greenberg, N. (2024). Psychosocial Impacts of Post-Disaster Compensation Processes: A Narrative Systematic Review. BMC psychology, 12(1), 539. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02025-9
Brown, C., Milke, M., & Seville, E. (2011). Disaster waste management: A review article. Waste management, 31(6), 1085–1098. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.01.027
Cernea, M. M. (2000). Risks, safeguards and reconstruction: A model for population displacement and resettlement. Economic and Political Weekly, 3659–3678.
Chang, Y., Wilkinson, S., Potangaroa, R., & Seville, E. (2010). Resourcing challenges for post-disaster housing reconstruction: a comparative analysis. Building Research & Information, 38(3), 247–264. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09613211003693945
Chansky, R. A. (2024). Oral History and the Climate Crisis: Listening in the Aftermath of Disaster. The Oral History Review, 51(2), 321–350. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00940798.2024.2380507
Crowley, J., & Flachsbart, P. (2018). Local debris management planning and FEMA policies on disaster recovery in the United States. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 27, 373–379. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.10.024
FEMA. (2011). National Disaster Recovery Framework: Strengthening Disaster Recovery for the Nation.
FEMA. (2024). National Disaster Recovery Framework
Fernando Ramírez, H. S. (2011). Populations at Risk of Disaster: A Resettlement Guide. In. World Bank.
Finegan, L., Goentzel, J., Reisman, E., Russell, T. E., & Story, D. (2024). Scaling Post-Disaster Housing Capacity: Roundtable Report.
Ghalibafan, M. (1991). Lessons from Manjil Earthquake.
Hallegatte, S., Rentschler, J., & Walsh, B. (2018). Building back better: achieving resilience through stronger, faster, and more inclusive post-disaster reconstruction.
Heffernan, T., Vahanvati, M., Halvitigala, D., Majumdar, A., McEvoy, D., & Sanderson, D. (2025). Enhancing housing recovery policy and practice for improving community resilience to future disasters. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.18408/ahuri7133201
Khorshidian, A., & Fayazi, M. (2023). Critical factors to succeed in post-earthquake housing reconstruction in Iran. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 94, 103786. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103786
Klaebe, H. (2013). Facilitating local stories in post-disaster regional communities: evaluation in narrative-driven oral history projects. Oral History Journal of South Africa, 1(1), 125–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25159/2309-5792/1599
Lee, J., Aldrich, D. P., Kiyota, E., Yasuhiro, T., & Sawada, Y. (2022). Social Capital Building Interventions and Self-Reported Post-Disaster Recovery in Ofunato, Japan. Scientific reports, 12(1), 10274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14537-8
Mahmodi, M. A., Farrokhi, M., Hosseini, S. M. R., Najafi, M., Motlagh, M. E., & Khankeh, H. R. (2025). Challenges of Community Participation in Health Emergency and Disaster Risk Management in an Iranian Context: A Qualitative Study. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1460421. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1460421
McAdoo, B. G., Dengler, L., Prasetya, G., & Titov, V. (2006). Smong: How an oral history saved thousands on Indonesia's Simeulue Island during the December 2004 and March 2005 tsunamis. Earthquake Spectra, 22(3_suppl), 661–669. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2204966
Moeinfar, A. N., Ahmad. (1989). Preliminary and urgent technical report of the earthquake of June 20, 1990, in Manjil (Gilan and Zanjan region) (in Persian).
Mohammadi, S., De Angeli, S., Boni, G., Pirlone, F., & Cattari, S. (2024). Current Approaches and Critical Issues in Multi-Risk Recovery Planning for Urban Areas Exposed to Natural Hazards. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 24(1), 79–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-79-2024
Okunola, O. H., & Werners, S. E. (2024). A multi-dimensional framework for assessing disaster recovery pathways: Lessons and experiences from Germany and Nigeria. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 112, 104777. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104777
Organization, W. H. (2019). Health Emergency and Disaster Risk Management Framework. In Health emergency and disaster risk management framework.
Quarantelli, E. L. (1995). Patterns of sheltering and housing in US disasters. Disaster prevention and management: an international journal, 4(3), 43–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/09653569510088069
Rohwerder, B. (2016). Transitional shelter in post-disaster contexts. Birmingham, UK: GSDRC, University of Birmingham.
Shaditalab, J. (1994). Sociology of Disaster: the experience of the Rudbar-Manjil Earthquake (in Persian).
Shaw, R., & Goda, K. (2004). From disaster to sustainable civil society: the Kobe experience. Disasters, 28(1), 16–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0361-3666.2004.00241.x
Sheikhbardsiri, H., Yarmohammadian, M. H., Rezaei, F., & Maracy, M. R. (2017). Rehabilitation of vulnerable groups in emergencies and disasters: A systematic review. World journal of emergency medicine, 8(4), 253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2017.04.002
Sloan, S. (2008). Oral history and Hurricane Katrina: Reflections on shouts and silences. The Oral History Review, 35(2), 176–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ohr/ohn027
Sommer, B. W. Q., Mary Kay. (2009). The Oral History Manual. Altamira Press.
Tafti, M. T. (2017). Reconstruction of informality: Can formal reconstruction re-create informality? In Urban planning for disaster recovery (pp. 107–128). Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804276-2.00008-6
Tafti, M. T., & Tomlinson, R. (2015). Best Practices in Post-Disaster Housing and Livelihood Recovery Interventions: Winners and Losers. International Development Planning Review, 37(2), 165–185. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2015.14
Thompson, P. (2015). The voice of the past: Oral history. In The oral history reader (pp. 33–39). Routledge.
Tuhkanen, H. (2023). Shifting power through participation in post-disaster recovery: A scoping review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 97, 104041. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104041
UNDP. (2019). Recovery: Challenges and Lessons. https://www.undp.org/publications/recovery-challenges-and-lessons
UNDP. (2020). Disaster Recovery Framework Guide.
UNDP/IRP. (2024). Disaster Recovery: Challenges and Lessons https://recovery.preventionweb.net/quick/84267
Wu, H. (2014). Post-Wenchuan Earthquake Rural Reconstruction and Recovery in Sichuan, China: Memory, Civic Participation, and Government Intervention, University of British Columbia. https://open.library.ubc.ca/media/stream/pdf/24/1.0167266/2
Zandi, A. P. (1991). The June 20 Earthquake of Manjil (in Persian).