تدوین و اعتباریابی بستۀ آموزشیِ خودمراقبتیِ کاهندۀ آسیب¬های ارتباط با جنس مخالف مبتنی بر نظریۀ رفتار برنامه-ریزی شده و اثربخشی آن بر تنظیم شناختی هیجان دانش¬آموزان دخترِ نوجوان

محورهای موضوعی : سلامت نوجوانان

زهرا قلمی ¹ , اسماعیل سعدی پور ^{2 *} , فریبرز درتاج ³ , حسن اسدزاده ⁴ , صغری ابراهیمی قوام ⁵

1 - دانشجوی دکتری روان¬شناسی تربیتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، [e-mail]
2 - (نویسنده مسئول)، استاد تمام گروه روان¬شناسی تربیتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران [e-mail], tell: ۰۹۳۹۱۴۸۷۰۵۳
3 - استاد تمام گروه روان¬شناسی تربیتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران [e-mail]
4 - استاد تمام گروه روان¬شناسی تربیتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران [e-mail]
5 - دانشیار گروه روان¬شناسی تربیتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران [e-mail]

تاریخ دریافت : 1402/08/10 تاریخ پذیرش : 1402/10/10 تاریخ انتشار : 1402/07/01

کلید واژه: آسیب¬های ارتباط با جنس مخالف, اعتباریابی, تنظیم شناختی هیجان, خودمراقبتی, نظریۀ رفتار برنامه¬ریزی شده,

چکیده مقاله :

چکیده مقدمه: پیشگیری از آسیب¬های ارتباط با جنس مخالف در دوران نوجوانی از اهمیت بالایی برخوردار است، زیرا در این زمان است که رفتارهای دوستیابی آغاز شده، هنجارهای رفتاری ایجاد می¬شوند و انواع آسیب¬های متعاقب ارتباط نامناسب با جنس مخالف شروع به آشکار شدن می¬کند. این پژوهش با هدف تدوین و اعتباریابی بستة آموزشیِ خودمراقبتیِ کاهندۀ آسیب¬های ارتباط با جنس مخالف مبتنی بر نظریۀ رفتار برنامه¬ریزی شده و اثربخشی آن بر تنظیم شناختی هیجان دانش¬آموزان دخترِ نوجوان انجام شد. روش¬ پژوهش: نمونة آماری به منظور اعتباریابی بستۀ آموزشی تولید شده شامل ۱۲ نفر از صاحبنظرانی بود که در مسائل حوزۀ نوجوانان دارای تخصص بودند که به روش هدفمند انتخاب شدند. نمونة آماری در بخش کمی شامل ۴۰ نفر از دانش¬آموزان دورة متوسطة دوم منطقة 20 تهران بود که با روش نمونه¬گیری چندمرحله¬ای انتخاب شدند. ابزار پژوهش شامل پرسشنامۀ تنظيم شناختي هيجان گارنفسکي و کرايج بود. تجزیه و تحلیل آماری در بخش کمی با استفاده از تحلیل کوواریانس در نرم‌افزار SPSS صورت گرفت. یافته¬ها: نتایج در بخش کیفی نشان داد که بستۀ آموزشیِ خودمراقبتیِ کاهندۀ آسیب¬های ارتباط با جنس مخالف مبتنی بر نظریۀ رفتار برنامه-ریزی شده از روایی مناسبی برخوردار است. در بخش کمی، نتایج آزمون تحلیل کوواریانس چندمتغیره نشان داد که میانگین تنظیم شناختی هیجان در دانش¬آموزان گروه آموزش خودمراقبتی کاهنده آسیب‎های ارتباط با جنس مخالف مبتنی بر نظریه رفتار برنامه‎ریزی‎شده از آزمودنی‎ها در گروه کنترل بیشتر بود (001/0sig=). بنابراین، بستۀ آموزشیِ خودمراقبتیِ کاهندۀ آسیب¬های ارتباط با جنس مخالف مبتنی بر نظریۀ رفتار برنامه¬ریزی شده بر تنظیم شناختی هیجان دانش¬آموزان دخترِ نوجوان موثر بود. نتیجه¬گیری: بستۀ آموزشیِ خودمراقبتیِ کاهندۀ آسیب¬های ارتباط با جنس مخالف مبتنی بر نظریۀ رفتار برنامه¬ریزی شده می‌تواند ابزاری کاربردی در جهت بهبود توانمندی¬های نوجوانان باشد و در ارتقای تنظیم شناختی هیجان نوجوانان دختر تأثیرگذار باشد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Abstract Introduction: The prevention of the damages of relation with the opposite sex during adolescence is of great importance because it is at this time that dating behaviors begin, behavioral norms are established, and all kinds of harms following improper relation with the opposite sex begin to appear. This research was conducted with the aim of developing and validating a self-care educational package that reduces the damages of relation with the opposite sex based on the theory of planned behavior and its effectiveness on the cognitive emotion regulation of adolescent girl students. Method: The statistical sample for the purpose of validating the produced educational package included 12 experts who had expertise in adolescent issues, who were selected in a purposeful way. The statistical sample in the quantitative section consisted of 40 high school girl students in the 20th district of Tehran who were selected by a multi-stage sampling method. The research tool included the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire Garnefski & Kraaij. Statistical analysis was done in the quantitative part using covariance analysis in SPSS software. Findings: The results in the qualitative part showed that the self-care educational package that reduces the damages of relation with the opposite sex based on the theory of planned behavior has good validity. In the quantitative part, the results of the multivariate covariance analysis test showed that the average of cognitive emotion regulation in the students of the self-care training group that reduces the damages of relation with the opposite sex based on the theory of planned behavior was higher than that of the subjects in the control group. (Sig=0.001). Therefore, the educational package of self-care that reduces the damages of relation with the opposite sex based on the theory of planned behavior was effective on the cognitive emotion regulation of adolescent girl students. Conclusion: The self-care educational package that reduces the damages of relation with the opposite sex, based on the theory of planned behavior, can be a practical tool to improve the abilities of adolescents and be effective in improving cognitive emotion regulation in adolescent girls.

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Willoughby T, Heffer T, Good M, Magnacca C. Is adolescence a time of heightened risk taking? An overview of types of risk-taking behaviors across age groups. Developmental Review. 2021 Sep 1; 61: 100980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2021.100980
2. De Berardis D, Fornaro M, Orsolini L, Ventriglio A, Vellante F, Di Giannantonio M. Emotional dysregulation in adolescents: implications for the development of severe psychiatric disorders, substance abuse, and suicidal ideation and behaviors. Brain Sciences. 2020 Aug 26; 10(9): 591. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10090591
3. Herd T, King-Casas B, Kim-Spoon J. Developmental changes in emotion regulation during adolescence: Associations with socioeconomic risk and family emotional context. Journal of youth and adolescence. 2020 Jul; 49: 1545-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01193-2
4. Stikkelbroek Y, Bodden DH, Kleinjan M, Reijnders M, van Baar AL. Adolescent depression and negative life events, the mediating role of cognitive emotion regulation. PloS one. 2016 Aug 29; 11(8):e0161062. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192300
5. Anniko MK, Boersma K, Tillfors M. Investigating the mediating role of cognitive emotion regulation in the development of adolescent emotional problems. Nordic Psychology. 2018 Jan 2; 70(1): 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/19012276.2017.1323665
6. Fiol-Veny A, Balle M, De la Torre-Luque A, Bornas X. Negative cognitive emotion regulation as a predictor of adolescent heart rate variability and entropy under social stress. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping. 2019 Nov 2; 32(6):641-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2019.1641199
7. Theurel A, Gentaz E. The regulation of emotions in adolescents: Age differences and emotion-specific patterns. PloS one. 2018 Jun 7; 13(6):e0195501. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195501
8. Schweizer S, Gotlib IH, Blakemore SJ. The role of affective control in emotion regulation during adolescence. Emotion. 2020 Feb; 20(1): 80. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000695
9. Garnefski N, Kraaij V. Specificity of relations between adolescents’ cognitive emotion regulation strategies and symptoms of depression and anxiety. Cognition and Emotion. 2018 Oct 3; 32(7):1401-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1232698
10. Sompa N, Tahsin MR, Ali MM. Exploring the Relationship between Life Satisfaction and Love-relationship Experiences under the Light of Cognitive Emotion Regulation and Conflict Resolution: The Consequences of their Interplays. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports. 2022 Oct 25: 77-96. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJARR/2022/v16i11440
11. Chu Q, Wang X, Yao R, Fan J, Li Y, Nie F, Wang L, Tang Q. Childhood trauma and current depression among Chinese university students: a moderated mediation model of cognitive emotion regulation strategies and neuroticism. BMC psychiatry. 2022 Dec; 22(1): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03673-6
12. Essau CA, LeBlanc SS, Ollendick TH, editors. Emotion regulation and psychopathology in children and adolescents. Oxford University Press; 2017 May 19. https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780198765844.001.0001
13. Wallace GT, Barrett KC, Henry KL, Prince MA, Conner BT. Examining underlying structures of cognitive emotion regulation strategies using exploratory structural equation modeling. Quality & Quantity. 2023 Oct; 57(5): 4171-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01531-5
14. Balzarotti S, Biassoni F, Villani D, Prunas A, Velotti P. Individual differences in cognitive emotion regulation: Implications for subjective and psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2016 Feb; 17: 125-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9587-3
15. Ahmadboukani S, Fathi D, Karami M, Bashirgonbadi S, Mahmoudpour A, Molaei B. Providing a health‐promotion behaviors model in elderly: Psychological capital, perceived social support, and attitudes toward death with mediating role of cognitive emotion regulation strategies. Health Science Reports. 2023 Jan; 6(1):e1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1020
16. Araújo L B. Exploring the relationship between cognitive emotion regulation strategies and mental toughness. University of Porto, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, 2022. https://hdl.handle.net/10216/145567
17. Extremera N, Quintana-Orts C, Sánchez-Álvarez N, Rey L. The role of cognitive emotion regulation strategies on problematic smartphone use: Comparison between problematic and non-problematic adolescent users. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2019 Sep; 16(17):3142. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16173142
18. Cai WP, Pan Y, Zhang SM, Wei C, Dong W, Deng GH. Relationship between cognitive emotion regulation, social support, resilience and acute stress responses in Chinese soldiers: Exploring multiple mediation model. Psychiatry research. 2017 Oct 1; 256: 71-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.06.018
19. Meiksin R, Allen E, Crichton J, Morgan GS, Barter C, Elbourne D, Hunt K, Melendez-Torres GJ, Morris S, Reyes HL, Sturgess J. Protocol for pilot cluster RCT of project respect: a school-based intervention to prevent dating and relationship violence and address health inequalities among young people. Pilot and feasibility studies. 2019 Dec; 5: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-019-0391-z
20. Alimoradi Z, Kariman N, Simbar M, Ahmadi F. Contributing factors to high-risk sexual behaviors among Iranian adolescent girls: A systematic review. International journal of community based nursing and midwifery. 2017 Jan; 5(1):2-12. PMID: 28097173; PMCID: PMC5219561.
21. Amiritalab H, Etemadi A. The effectiveness of self-differentiation training on friendship relation in girl students, Journal of Woman Cultural Psychology. 2017; 8(30): 7-17. (Persian) https://journals.iau.ir/article_529391_0.html
22. Khalajabadi Farahani F. Meta Analysis of Premarital Heterosexual Relationships among Young People in Iran over the Past 15 Years (2001-2015). Journal of Family Research. 2017; 12(3): 339-367. (Persian) https://jfr.sbu.ac.ir/article_97397.html
23. Offenhauer P, Buchalter A. Teen dating violence: A literature review and annotated bibliography. InA report prepared by the Federal Research Division, Library of Congress under an interagency agreement with the Violence and Victimization Research Division, National Institute of Justice 2011 Jun. https://doi.org/10.1037/e726412011-001
24. De La Rue L, Polanin JR, Espelage DL, Pigott TD. School‐based interventions to reduce dating and sexual violence: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 2014; 10(1): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2014.7
25. Meiksin R, Crichton J, Dodd M, Morgan GS, Williams P, Willmott M, Allen E, Tilouche N, Sturgess J, Morris S, Barter CA. A school intervention for 13-to 15-year-olds to prevent dating and relationship violence: the Project Respect pilot cluster RCT. Public Health Research. 2020; 8(5):1-338. https://doi.org/10.3310/phr08050
26. Temple JR, Le VD, Muir A, Goforth L, McElhany AL. The Need for School-Based Teen Dating Violence Prevention. Journal of Applied Research on Children. 2013;4(1):4. https://doi.org/10.58464/2155-5834.1136
27. Khani Jeihooni A, Kouhpayeh A, Najafi S, Bazrafshan MR. Application theory of planned behavior on promotion of safe sexual behaviors among drug users. Journal of Substance Use. 2019 May 4; 24(3):293-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/14659891.2018.1562575
28. Hou WL, Lin CY, Wang YM, Tseng YH, Shu BC. Assessing related factors of intention to perpetrate dating violence among university students using the Theory of Planned Behavior. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2020 Feb; 17(3): 923. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030923
29. Momayyezi M, Fallahzadeh H, Rahaei Z, Akrami F, Hosseini M, Shakhs S. Prediction of food safety behaviors based on the theory of planned behavior in iranian women. Journal of Human Environment and Health Promotion. 2020 Mar 10; 6(1):24-9. https://doi.org/10.29252/jhehp.6.1.5
30. Agili DE, Salihu HM. Implementation of a school-based tobacco prevention program for adolescent females in Saudi Arabia guided by the theory of planned behavior. Population Medicine. 2020 May 27; 2(May). https://doi.org/10.18332/popmed/122528
31. Sarzehi N, Moodi M, Sharifzadeh G. Application of Theory of Planned Behavior in Predicting of effective Factors on heterosexual relationship in girls Adolescence of Birjand city. J Birjand Univ Med Sci. 2016; 23 (4): 325-333. (Persian) http://journal.bums.ac.ir/article-1-2029-fa.html
32. Sheikh darani H, Mehrabi H, Kajbaf MB, Abedi MR. The effect of education based on increasing awareness of the harms resulting from harmful relationships between girls and boys on the attitudes of female high school students. Knowledge & Research in Applied Psychology. 2009; 10(38): 41-62. (Persian) https://jsr-p.isfahan.iau.ir/article_533744.html
33. Rahmani E, Arefi M, Afsharineya K, Amiri H. Designing the educational package of sexual education based on Iranian culture and effectiveness on social self-efficacy and sexual risk-taking in middle school girl students. Journal of Psychological Science. 2018; 17(70), 735-744. (Persian) http://psychologicalscience.ir/article-1-284-fa.html
34. Darabi F, Kaveh MH, Farahani FK, Yaseri M, Majlessi F, Shojaeizadeh D. The effect of a theory of planned behavior-based educational intervention on sexual and reproductive health in Iranian adolescent girls: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of research in health sciences. 2017; 17(4): 400. PMCID: PMC7189942.
35. Taylor BG, Mumford EA, Stein ND. Effectiveness of “shifting boundaries” teen dating violence prevention program for subgroups of middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2015 Feb 1; 56(2): S20-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.07.004
36. Mathews C, Eggers SM, Townsend L, Aarø LE, de Vries PJ, Mason-Jones AJ, De Koker P, McClinton Appollis T, Mtshizana Y, Koech J, Wubs A. Effects of PREPARE, a multi-component, school-based HIV and intimate partner violence (IPV) prevention programme on adolescent sexual risk behavior and IPV: cluster randomized controlled trial. AIDS and Behavior. 2016 Sep; 20: 1821-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-016-1410-1
37. Trieu AV. Effectiveness of school-based prevention program in addressing intimate partner violence. Master thesis, California State University, San Bernardino. 2017. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd/528
38. Sosa-Rubi SG, Saavedra-Avendano B, Piras C, Van Buren SJ, Bautista-Arredondo S. True love: effectiveness of a school-based program to reduce dating violence among adolescents in Mexico City. Prevention science. 2017 Oct; 18: 804-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0718-4
39. Rizzo CJ, Joppa M, Barker D, Collibee C, Zlotnick C, Brown LK. Project Date SMART: A dating violence (DV) and sexual risk prevention program for adolescent girls with prior DV exposure. Prevention science. 2018 May; 19: 416-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-018-0871-z
40. Vivolo-Kantor AM, Niolon PH, Estefan LF, Le VD, Tracy AJ, Latzman NE, Little TD, Lang KM, DeGue S, Tharp AT. Middle school effects of the Dating Matters® comprehensive teen dating violence prevention model on physical violence, bullying, and cyberbullying: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. Prevention science. 2021 Feb; 22: 151-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-01071-9
41. Hosseini M, Matoor M. Designing, developing and validating a cooperative learning model for elementary school Farsi curriculum of “let’s read and write” (bekhanim & benevisim). Educational Innovations. 2013; 12(46): 9-50. (Persian) https://noavaryedu.oerp.ir/article_79003.html
42. Sadipour E. Research methods in psychology and educational sciences. Volume 1, Tehran: Douran. 2021. (Persian)
43. Garnefski N, Kraaij V. Cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire–development of a short 18-item version (CERQ-short). Personality and individual differences. 2006 Oct 1; 41(6): 1045-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.04.010
44. Besharat MA. Cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire: Instruction and scoring. Journal of Developmental Psychology: Iranian Psychologists. 2016; 13(50): 221-223. (Persian) https://jip.stb.iau.ir/article_529166.html
45. Besharat MA, Bazzazian S. Psychometri properties of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire in a sample of Iranian population. Advances in Nursing & Midwifery. 2015; 24(84): 61–70. (Persian) https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/en-jnm/article/view/7360
46. Ravi KE, Black BM, Mitschke DB, Pearson K. A pilot study of a teen dating violence prevention program with Karen refugees. Violence against women. 2019 May; 25(7):792-816. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218804091
47. Sheikh darani H, Golparvar M, Sajjadian I. The effectiveness of the Matrix intervention program and harm reduction training on mental health indices and attitudes toward harmful relationship in harmed high school female students from relation with opposite sex. Knowledge & Research in Applied Psychology. 2021; 22(3): 1-19. (Persian) https://doi.org/10.30486/jsrp.2019.1865531.1779
48. Antle BF, Sullivan DJ, Dryden A, Karam EA, Barbee AP. Healthy relationship education for dating violence prevention among high-risk youth. Children and Youth Services Review. 2011 Jan 1; 33(1): 173-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.08.031
49. Zych I, Viejo C, Vila E, Farrington DP. School bullying and dating violence in adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 2021 Apr; 22(2):397-412. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019854460
50. Ajalloueian N, Rezaie E, Aboutorabi R. The effectiveness of teaching healthy relationship with oppositional on anger managment and increasing social skills in adolescent Girls. Applied Research in Consulting. 2021; 4(1): 23-42. (Persian) https://www.jarci.ir/article_244221.html
51. Wolfe DA, Crooks C, Jaffe P, Chiodo D, Hughes R, Ellis W, Stitt L, Donner A. A school-based program to prevent adolescent dating violence: A cluster randomized trial. Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine. 2009 Aug 3; 163(8): 692-9. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.69
52. Whittaker A, Adler-Baeder F, Garneau C. The effects of relationship education on adolescent traditional gender role attitudes and dating violence acceptance. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension. 2014; 2(3):59-69. https://doi.org/10.54718/CZWZ6595