مدل¬یابی روابط ساختاری رفتار دلبستگی زناشویی و رابطه مادر-کودک: نقش میانجی خودخاموشی
محورهای موضوعی : مدل سازی
فاطمه شهامت دهسرخ
1
*
,
میلاد میرزائی
2
,
ریحانه ارجمندنیا
3
1 - استادیار گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه خیام، مشهد، ایران. (نویسنده مسئول) Email: f.shahamat@khayyam.ac.ir, tell: 09151210643
2 - دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه غیرانتفاعی خیام، مشهد، ایران mildmirzaeee7@gmail.com
3 - دانشجوی دکترا، واحد بیرجند، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بیرجند، ایران reyhanearjmandnia46@gmail.com
کلید واژه: خودخاموشی, دلبستگی زناشویی, رابطه مادر-کودک, مادران,
چکیده مقاله :
چکیده مقدمه: کیفیت روابط والدین به خصوص رابطه مادر-کودک نقش تعیین کننده ای در شکل گیری شخصیت و عملکرد اجتماعی و شناختی و نیز بهداشت روان کودک در آینده دارد . هدف پژوهش حاضر، بررسی روابط ساختاری رفتار دلبستگی زناشویی و رابطه مادر-کودک با نقش میانجی خودخاموشی در میان مادران بود. روش پژوهش: روش پژوهش از نوع همبستگی و از نوع مدل یابی معادلات ساختاری (SEM) بود. بدین، منظور 255 نفر از مادران متاهل دارای فرزند به روش نمونه گیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند و پرسشنامه های ارزیابی رابطه مادر-کودک (MCRE)، رفتار دلبستگی زناشویی (BARE) و خودخاموشی (STSS) را تکمیل کردند. تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها با استفاده از نرم افزار SPSS و لیزرل نسخه 8.8 انجام گرفت. یافته ها: نتایج نشان داد که بین رفتار دلبستگی زناشویی و خودخاموشی رابطه منفی و معناداری وجود دارد (33/0-r= ). همچنین بین تمامی مؤلفه های خودخاموشی با مولفه پذیرش فرزند رابطه منفی (30/0-r= )، و بین رفتار دلبستگی زناشویی با یکی از مولفه های رابطه مادر-کودک یعنی پذیرش فرزند رابطه مثبت و معناداری وجود داشت (20/0r= ). همچنین، نقش میانجی خودخاموشی در رابطه بین رفتار دلبستگی زناشویی و رابطه مادر-کودک نیز مورد تایید قرار گرفت و باتوجه به شاخص ها مدل از نظر برازش مطلوب بود. نتیجه گیری: یافته¬های پژوهش نشان داد که خودخاموشی در رابطه بین رفتار دلبستگی زناشویی و رابطه مادر- کودک نقش میانجی ایفا می-کند. رفتارهای دلبستگی زناشویی شامل رفتارهای در درسترس بودن، پاسخگو بودن و مشغولیت در رابطه با اثر بر حسی که مادران از خود دارند بر کیفیت رابطه آنها با کودک تأثیر می گذارد.
Abstract: Introduction: The quality of parental relationships, especially the mother-child relationship, plays a decisive role in shaping the child's personality, social and cognitive functioning, as well as their mental health in the future. The aim of the present study was to investigate the structural relationships between marital attachment behaviors and the mother-child relationship, with the mediating role of self-silencing among mothers. Research method: The research method was correlational and employed structural equation modeling (SEM). For this purpose, 255 married mothers with children were selected through convenience sampling and completed the Mother-Child Relationship Evaluation (MCRE), Marital Attachment Behavior (BARE), and Self-Silencing (STSS) questionnaires. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS 24 and LISREL version 8.8. Findings: The results showed a significant negative relationship between marital attachment behavior and self-silencing (r = -0.33). Additionally, there was a negative relationship between all components of self-silencing and the child acceptance component (r = -0.30), and a significant positive relationship between marital attachment behavior and one of the components of the mother-child relationship, namely child acceptance (r = 0.20). Furthermore, the mediating role of self-silencing in the relationship between marital attachment behavior and the mother-child relationship was confirmed. Considering the indices, the model demonstrated good fit. Conclusion: The research findings showed that self-silencing mediates the relationship between marital attachment behaviors and the mother-child relationship. Marital attachment behaviors, which including accessibility, responsiveness and engagement, impact the quality of the mother-child relationship through their effect on the mothers' self-perception.
1. Ali E, Letourneau N, Benzies K. Parent-child attachment: A principle-based concept analysis. SAGE Open Nursing. 2021; 7:23.https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608211009000.
2. Anaya LY. Marital conflict and child-mother attachment relationships. 2015.
3. Hollenstein T, Tighe AB, Lougheed JP. Emotional development in the context of mother–child relationships. Current .opinion .in .psychology. 2017; 17: 140-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.010
4. Adare AA, Zhang Y, Hu Y, Wang Z. Relationship between parental marital conflict and social anxiety symptoms of Chinese college students: mediation effect of attachment. Frontiers in psychology. 2021; 12:640770. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.640770.
5. Kinsey CB, Hupcey JE. State of the science of maternal–infant bonding: A principle-based concept analysis. Midwifery. 2013; 29(12): 1314-20.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2012.12.019 .
6. Cassidy J, Jones JD, Shaver PR. Contributions of attachment theory and research: A framework for future research, translation, and policy. Development and psychopathology. 2013;25(4pt2):1415-34.. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579413000692.
7. Little KK, Sockol LE. Romantic relationship satisfaction and parent-infant bonding during the transition to parenthood: An attachment-based perspective. Frontiers in psychology. 2020;11:2068 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02068.
8. McClain Z, Peebles R. Body Image and Eating Disorders among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Youth. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2016;63(6):1079-90.
9. Bradford AB, Burningham KL, Sandberg JG, Johnson LN. The association between the parent–child relationship and symptoms of anxiety and depression: The roles of attachment and perceived spouse attachment behaviors. Journal of marital and family therapy. 2017;43(2):291-307.https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12190.
10. Krauss S, Orth U, Robins RW. Family environment and self-esteem development: A longitudinal study from age 10 to 16. Journal of personality and social psychology. 2020;119(2):457. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000263.
11. Mark KM, Pike A. Links between marital quality, the mother–child relationship and child behavior: A multi-level modeling approach. International Journal of Behavioral Development. 2017;41(2):285-94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025416635281.
12. Eiden RD, Teti DM, Corns KM. Maternal working models of attachment, marital adjustment, and theparent‐childrelationship.Childdevelopment.1995;66(5):1504-18. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131660.
13. Feeney JA. Adult romantic attachment: Developments in the study of couple relationships. 2008.
14. Mikulincer M, Shaver PR. “Can't buy me love”: An attachment perspective on social support and money as psychological buffers. Psychological Inquiry. 2008;19(3-4):167-73.
15. Cordova JV, Scott RL. Intimacy: A behavioral interpretation. The Behavior Analyst. 2001; 24: 75-86.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392020.
16. Gottman JM, Coan J, Carrere S, Swanson C. Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 1998:5-22..
17. Sandberg JG, Busby DM, Johnson SM, Yoshida K. The brief accessibility, responsiveness, and engagement (BARE) scale: A tool for measuring attachment behavior in couple relationships. Family Process. 2012; 51(4):512-26.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2012.01422.x.
18. Johnson SM. Couple and family therapy: An attachment perspective. 2008.
19. Jack DC. Silencing the self: Women and depression: Harvard University Press; 1991.
20. Swim JK, Eyssell KM, Murdoch EQ, Ferguson MJ. Self‐silencing to sexism. Journal of Social Issues. 2010;66(3):493-507.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01658.x
21. Jack DC, Ali A. Silencing the self across cultures: Depression and gender in the social world: Oxford University Press; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195398090.001.0001.
22. Cramer KM, Thoms N. Factor structure of the silencing the self-scale in women and men. Personality and Individual Differences. 2003; 35(3): 525-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00216-7.
23. Ahmed F, Iqbal H. Self-silencing and marital adjustment in women with and without depression. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research. 2019; 34(2): 311-30. https://doi.org/10.33824/PJPR.2019.34.2.17.
24. Maji S, Dixit S. Self-silencing and women’s health: A review. International Journal of Social Psychiatry. 2019;65(1):3-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764018814271
25. Whiffen VE, Foot ML, Thompson JM. Self-silencing mediates the link between marital conflict and depression. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2007; 24(6):993-1006.https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407507084813.
26. Dib EP, Padovani FHP, Perosa GB. Mother-child interaction: implications of chronic maternal anxiety and depression. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica. 2019; 32: 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-019-0123-6.
27. Gueron-Sela N, Camerota M, Willoughby MT, Vernon-Feagans L, Cox MJ. Maternal depressive symptoms, mother-child interactions, and children’s executive function. Developmental psychology. 2018; 54(1):71.https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000389.
28. Gall MD, Gall JP, Borg WR, editors. A. Method of the Study. A Cohesion and Coherence on Students’ exposition Writing; 2017. https://books.google.com/books?id=E9DhnQEACAAJ.
29. Whitman B, Zachary RA. Factor Structure of the Mother-Child Relationship Evaluation'. Educationalandpsychologicalmeasurement.1986; 46(1): 135-41 https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164486461012.
30. Shahi, Arjamandania, Afrooz, Gholamali, Qavami, Farah. The effectiveness of the transformative relationship therapy program on improving mother-child interaction with autism spectrum disorder. Psychology of exceptional people. 2022; 12(47):1-32.
31. Busby DM, Walker EC, Holman TB. The association of childhood trauma with perceptions of self and the partner in adult romantic relationships. Personal Relationships. 2011;18(4):547-61.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01316.x.
32. Mohsen R, Mohsen Beg, Reza D. Assessing the psychometric properties of the short scale of accessibility, responsiveness and companionship (BARE): a tool for measuring attachment behavior in marital relationships. 2018.
33. Jack DC, Dill D. The Silencing the Self Scale: Schemas of intimacy associated with depression in women. Psychology of women quarterly.1992;16(1):97-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1992.tb00242.x.
34. Zabihi Dan S. "The relationship between family communication patterns and feelings of loneliness with the mediation of self-criticism and self-exclusion". Specialized thesis, Faculty of Humanities, Shiraz University, 2010.
35. Filip F, Marascu-Klein V, editors. The 5S lean method as a tool of industrial management performances. IOP conference series: materials science and engineering; 2015: IOP Publishing.
36. Raykov T, Marcoulides GA. Estimation of generalizability coefficients via a structural equation modeling approach to scale reliability evaluation. International Journal of Testing. 2006; 6(1):81-95.
37. Whisman MA. The association between depression and marital dissatisfaction. 2001.. https://doi.org/10.1037/10350-001
38. Erel O, Burman B. Interrelatedness of marital relations and parent-child relations: a meta-analytic review. Psychological bulletin. 1995; 118(1):108.
39. Krishnakumar A, Buehler C. Interparental conflict and parenting behaviors: A meta‐analytic review. Family relations. 2000; 49(1):25-44.
40. Twenge JM, Campbell WK, Foster CA. Parenthood and marital satisfaction: a meta‐analytic review. Journal of marriage and family. 2003; 65(3): 574-83. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3600024.
41. Davies PT, Cummings EM, Winter MA. Pathways between profiles of family functioning, child security in the interparental subsystem, and child psychological problems. Development and psychopathology. 2004; 16(3): 525-50. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579404004651.
42. Humphreys KL, King LS, Choi P, Gotlib IH. Maternal depressive symptoms, self-focus, and caregiving behavior. Journal of affective disorders. 2018; 238:465-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.05.072.
43. Thompson CB. Apoptosis in the pathogenesis and treatment of disease. Science. 1995; 267(5203): 1456-62.
44. Maji S, Dixit S. Self-silencing and women’s health: A review. International Journal of Social Psychiatry. 2019; 65(1):3-13.. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764018814271.
45. Johnson DW. Social interdependence: interrelationships among theory, research, and practice. American psychologist. 2003; 58(11):934.