مقایسه اثربخشی درمان مبتنی بر رویکرد پذیرش و تعهد (ACT) با واقعیتدرمانی بر باورهای غیرمنطقی در زوجین متعارض در دوره پساکرونا
محورهای موضوعی : روانشناسی زوجین
طاهره کاشانی خطیب
1
*
,
عبدالله شفیع آبادی
2
*
,
عماد یوسفی
3
1 - دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مشاوره، واحد قشم، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قشم، ایران
2 - استاد، گروه مشاوره، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران، (نویسنده مسئول) Email: ashafiabady@yahoo.com, tell: 09383728186
3 - استادیار، گروه روانشناسی و مشاوره، واحد قشم، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قشم، ایران، Email: emad.yousefi30@gmail.com
کلید واژه: باورهای غیرمنطقی, پذیرش و تعهد, پساکرونا, تعارض, واقعیتدرمانی,
چکیده مقاله :
چکیده
مقدمه: با توجه به اینکه رویکردهای مبتنی بر پذیرش و تعهد و واقعیتدرمانی گلاسر باعث افزایش میزان احتمال معنا در زندگی، شادکامی، برخورداری از باور مثبت دربارهی خود و دیگران و افزایش میزان کنترل درونی می شوند، هدف پژوهش حاضر مقایسه اثربخشی درمان مبتنی بر رویکرد پذیرش و تعهد (ACT) با واقعیتدرمانی بر باورهای غیرمنطقی در زوجین متعارض در دوره پساکرونا بود.
روش پژوهش: روش پژوهش نیمهآزمایشی با طرح پیشآزمون - پسآزمون و گروه کنترل با دوره پیگیری دوماهه بود. جامعه آماري پژوهش حاضر، کلیه زوجین متعارض مراجعهکننده به درمانگاهها و مراکز مشاوره منطقه 20 شهر تهران در سال 1401 بودند. تعداد 45 نفر به شیوه هدفمند انتخاب و با گمارش تصادفی در دو گروه آزمایش و یک گروه گواه قرار گرفتند. ابزار پژوهش باورهای غیرمنطقی جونز بود. مداخله درمان مبتنی بر رویکرد پذیرش و تعهد (ACT) و واقعیتدرمانی در 8 جلسه 90 دقیقهای، هفتهای دو بار بهصورت گروهی برای گروه آزمایش اول و دوم اجرا شد. دادهها با بهرهگیری از تحليل واریانس آميخته تجزیهوتحلیل شدند.
یافتهها: نتایج نشان داد بین پسآزمون و پیگیری گروههای آزمایش و گواه باورهای غیرمنطقی تفاوت معناداری وجود دارد (05/0>P) و درمان پذیرش و تعهد نسبت به واقعیتدرمانی بهطور معناداری بر باورهای غیرمنطقی زوجین متعارض در دوره پساکرونا اثربخشتر بود و بین دو درمان تفاوت معنادار مشاهده شد (05/0>P).
نتیجهگیری: بنابراین میتوان گفت که رویکرد پذیرش و تعهد (ACT) اثربخش تر از واقعیتدرمانی در کاهش باورهای غیرمنطقی در زوجین متعارض بود.
© 2020 The Author(s). This work is published by family and health as an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
Introduction: Given that approaches based on acceptance and commitment and Glasser's reality therapy increase the likelihood of meaning in life, happiness, having positive beliefs about oneself and others, and increasing the level of internal control, the purpose of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of treatment based on the acceptance and commitment approach (ACT) with reality therapy on irrational beliefs in conflicting couples in the post-corona era.
Method: The research method was semi-experimental with a pre-test-post-test design and a control group with a two-month follow-up era. The statistical population of the present study was all conflicted couples who referred to clinics and counseling centers in the 20th district of Tehran in 2022. 45 people were selected in a purposeful way and randomly assigned to two experimental groups and one control group. The research tool was Jones' (1968) irrational beliefs. The treatment intervention based on acceptance and commitment approach (ACT) and reality therapy was implemented in 8 sessions of 90 minutes, twice a week as a group for the first and second experimental groups. The data were analyzed using mixed analysis of variance.
Results: The results showed that there is a significant difference between the post-test and the follow-up of the test and control groups of irrational beliefs (P<0.05) and the treatment of acceptance and commitment to reality therapy was significantly more effective on the irrational beliefs of conflicting couples in the post-corona era and there is a significant difference between the two treatments observed (P<0.05).
Conclusion: It can be said that the acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) was more effective than reality therapy in reducing irrational beliefs in conflicted couples.
1. Rolland JS. COVID-19 Pandemic: Applying a Multisystemic Lens. Family process. 2020; 59(3): 922-936. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12584
2. Sim MR. The COVID-19 pandemic: major risks to healthcare and other workers on the front line. Occupational and environmental medicine. 2020; 77(5): 281-282. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2020-106567
3. Gunthe SS, Swain B, Patra SS, Amte A. On the global trends and spread of the COVID-19 outbreak: preliminary assessment of the potential relation between location-specific temperature and UV index. Zeitschrift fur Gesundheitswissenschaften = Journal of public health. 2022; 30(1): 219-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-020-01279-y
4. Stanley SM, Markman HJ. Helping Couples in the Shadow of COVID-19. Family process. 2020; 59(3): 937–955. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12575
5. Brock RL, Laifer LM. Family science in the context of the COVID‐19 pandemic: Solutions and new directions. Family process. 2020; 59(3): 1007-1017. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12582
6. Chu IYH, Alam P, Larson HJ, Lin L. Social consequences of mass quarantine during epidemics: a systematic review with implications for the COVID-19 response. Journal of travel medicine. 2020; 27(7): taaa192. https://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taaa192
7. Lee S, Jobe M, Mathis A. Mental health characteristics associated with dysfunctional coronavirus anxiety. Psychological Medicine. 2021; 51(8): 1403-1404. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329172000121X
8. Lin CY, Broström A, Griffiths MD, Pakpour AH. Investigating mediated effects of fear of COVID-19 and COVID-19 misunderstanding in the association between problematic social media use, psychological distress, and insomnia. Internet interventions. 2020; 21: 100345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2020.100345
9. Zhu J, Liu M, Shu X, Xiang S, Jiang Y, Li Y. The moderating effect of marital conflict on the relationship between social avoidance and socio-emotional functioning among young children in suburban China. Frontiers in psychology. 2022; 13: 1009528. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1009528
10. Zareei Mahmoodabadi H, Sedrpoushan N, Kalantari M. The effectiveness of grief coping training in a group way in improving the experience of grief caused by covid-19 in women of Yazd city. TB. 2023; 22(1): 16-31. https://tbj.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-3479-fa.html (In Persian)
11. Afsharpour S, Aghdasi A. A comparative study of the effectiveness of reality therapy and existential therapy on the resilience of women with breast cancer Subject Areas: Woman & study of family. 2020; 14(52), 19-40. https://jwsf.tabriz.iau.ir/article_678500.html (In Persian)
12. Galea S, Merchant RM, Lurie N. The mental health consequences of COVID-19 and physical distancing: the need for prevention and early intervention. JAMA internal medicine. 2020; 180(6): 817-818. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1562
13. Hogan JN, Crenshaw AO, Baucom KJW, Baucom BRW. Time Spent Together in Intimate Relationships: Implications for Relationship Functioning. Contemporary family therapy. 2021; 43(3). 226–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-020-09562-6
14. Frye N, Ganong L, Jensen T, Coleman M. A dyadic analysis of emotion regulation as a moderator of associations between marital conflict and marital satisfaction among first -married and remarried couples. Journal of Family Issues. 2020; 41(12): 2328-2355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X20935504
15. Sarac A, Sanberk I. Marital Problem Solving Interaction and Satisfaction: A Micro analytic Study. The American Journal of Family Therapy. 2020; 50(1): 33-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2020.1862004
16. Ma J, Ji L, Lu G. Adolescents' experiences of acceptance and commitment therapy for depression: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of good-outcome cases. Frontiers in psychology. 2023; 14: 1050227. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1050227
17. Hajatpour R, Haroon Rashidi H. The Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on Irrational Beliefs and Death Attitude in the Elderly. Aging Psychology. 2020; 7(1): 43-54. https://jap.razi.ac.ir/article_1729.html?lang=en (In Persian)
18. Sharif Ara B, Khosropour F, Molayi Zarandi H. Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) on Emotional Processing, Irrational Beliefs and Rumination in Patients with Generalized Anxiety Disorder. JAYPS [Internet]. 2023; 4(4): 34-4. https://journals.kmanpub.com/index.php/jayps/article/view/1142 (In Persian)
19. Kamsari F, Keshavarz Afshar H, Ghadami M, Ahghar G. Comprehensive the effects of Adlerian group counseling and reality therapy on self-efficacy in students of middle school. Rooyesh. 2021; 10(5): 107-118. http://frooyesh.ir/article-1-2639-fa.html (In Persian)
20. Sharf S. Theories of psychotherapy & counseling: Concepts and cases. UK: Cengage Learning, 2015.
21. Shomaliahmadabadi M, Barkhordari Ahmadabadi A. The effectiveness of case virtual reality therapy on corona anxiety. Rooyesh. 2020; 9(7): 163-170. http://frooyesh.ir/article-1-2003-fa.html (In Persian)
22. Abdi Dehkordi S, Sharifi T, Qazanfari A, Solati K. The Effectiveness of Group Reality Therapy on Irrational Beliefs, Psychological Hardiness, and Academic Achievement of Students with Exceptional Talents. JOEC. 2019; 19(1): 95-108. http://joec.ir/article-1-869-fa.html (In Persian)
23. Jones RG. A factored measure of Ellis’s irrational beliefs with personality and maladjustment correlates. Texas: Technological College, 1986.
24. Parvaneh P, Khalatbari J, Saeedpoor F. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Dialectical-Behavioral and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy on Irrational Beliefs, Emotion Regulation, and Impulsive Behaviors of High School Female Students. Journal of community health. 2021; 15(2), 69-81. https://chj.rums.ac.ir/article_137410.html?lang=fa (In Persian)
25. Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Wilson K G. Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change. New York: Guilford Press, 2016.
26. Glasser W, Glasser C. The effect of reality therapy -based group counseling on self-esteem. The University of Virginia, 2010.
27. Paliliunas D, Belisle J, Dixon MR. A Randomized Control Trial to Evaluate the Use of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) to Increase Academic Performance and Psychological Flexibility in Graduate Students. Behavior analysis in practice. 2018; 11(3): 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-018-0252-x
28. Shameli L, Davodi M. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Reducing Interference and Improving Verbal and Visual Working Memory in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis, International Journal of Behavioral Sciences (IJBS). 2021; 15(1): 14-19. https://www.behavsci.ir/article_131145.html
29. Bahramian A, Kazemi S, Javidi H, Barzegar M. The Relationship between Conflict Resolution Styles, Irrational Beliefs and Communication Patterns with Marital Conflicts. Psychological Models and Methods. 2024. 15(55): 1-20. https://jpmm.marvdasht.iau.ir/article_6254.html?lang=fa (In Persian)
30. Fatehi N, Kachooei M. Relationship between Irrational Relationship Beliefs and Couple Burnout: The Mediator Role of Non_Adaptive Strategies of Cognitive Emotion Regulation. The Medical Journal of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. 2021. 63(5), 2903-2913. https://mjms.mums.ac.ir/article_17721.html?lang=fa (In Persian)