بررسی اثرات ساختار آموزش بر توزیع درآمد
محورهای موضوعی : اقتصاد کار و جمعیت
کلید واژه: توزیع درآمد, ساختار آموزشی,
چکیده مقاله :
در این مقاله به بررسی اثرات ساختار آموزش بر توزیع درآمد ایران در دوره 1386-1347 پرداخته‌ایم. در این راستا علاوه بر بررسی تاثیر میزان آموزش بر نابرابری، به بررسی تاثیر هر کدام از سطوح آموزشی و همچنین تاثیر آموزش دولتی و خصوصی و آموزش میان مردان و زنان بر مقدار توزیع درآمد پرداختیم. یافته‌های این مقاله حکایت از آن دارد که سطوح مختلف آموزش سبب کاهش نابرابری شده و همچنین افزایش آموزش دولتی نسبت به خصوصی سبب کاهش بیشتر نابرابری خواهد شد. آموزش زنان نیز بیش از آموزش مردان، نابرابری درآمدی در جامعه را کاهش داده است.
In this paper, the effects of education structure on the distribution of income are going to be explained during 1968 – 2007 in Iran. In order to achieve the end, the writers try to represent the effects of education on the income in equality, the effects of different levels of education, the impact of private and public education and the difference of education effects between men and women. The findings represent that the more the level of education, the less the inequality of income. Public education reduces the income inequality more than the private education and woman education decrease the inequality more than men.
منابع
- Acemoglu, D., & Joshua, A. (2000). How large are human-capital externalities? evidence from compulsory schooling laws. 15 NBER Macroeconomics Annual
- Barro, R. J. (1991).Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2, 106, pp. 443-404.
- Chenery, h. et all. (1974). Redistribution with growth. Oxfoed University Press
- Eckstein, Z., & Zilcha, I. (1994). The effect of compulsory schooling on growth, income distribution, and welfare. Journal of Public Economics, 54, PP 339–359.
- Glomm, G., & Ravikumar, B. (1992). Public versus private investment in human capital: endogenous growth and income inequality. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 818–834.
- Grossman, G., & Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and growth in the global economy. MIT Press.
- Grossman, M. (2003). Education and nonmarket outcomes. In Handbook of the Economics of Education. E. Hanushek and F. Welch, Eds. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
- Kafaei, M. & Dorostkar, A. (2007). Formal education and income distribution. Iranian Journal of Economic Research, Issue 30, pp 53-76 (in Persian)
- Kakwani N., & Shahidur Khandker & Hyun H. Son. (2003). Poverty equivalent growth rate: with application to korea and thailand. World Bank, Washington D.C.
- Kuznets. (1995).Economics growth and income equality. American Economic Review, Vol. 45, No. 1, PP. 1-28.
- Lucas, Robert E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3-42.
- Mankiw, N., & Romer, D. and Weil, D. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107,112-128.
- Meregan, N. & M. Mosaei & R. Kihanihekmat (2008). Economic growth and income distribution in Iran. Social Welfare, 28, 57-78 (in Persian)
- Romer, Paul M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 71-102.
- Saint-Paul, G., & Verdier, T. (1992). Education, democracy, and growth. Centre for Economic Policy Research, London. Discussion Paper No. 613.
- Schultz, T. W. (1963). The economic value of education. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Schwartz, A. (1976). Migration, age, and education. Journal of Political Economy, 84(4), 701-719.
- Sylwester K. (2002). Can education expenditures reduce income inequality?. Economics of Education Review, 21, 43–52.
- Sylwester, K. (2000). A model of public education and income inequality. Working Paper. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.
- Zhang, J. (1996). Optimal investments in education and endogenous growth. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 98, 387–404.