بررسی پرورش کنه ی شکارگرNeoseiulus barkeri (Acari: Phytoseiidae) با استفاده از طعمه های جایگزین
محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه زیست شناسی جانوری
1 - بخش تحقیقات جانورشناسی کشاورزی، موسسه تحقیقات گیاه پزشکی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، تهران، ایران
2 - بخش تحقیقات جانورشناسی کشاورزی، موسسه تحقیقات گیاه پزشکی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، تهران، ایران
کلید واژه: شکارگر, بومی, پرورش, کنه انباری, گرده,
چکیده مقاله :
كنهی شكارگر Neoseiulus barkeri (Acari: Phytoseiidae) از شكارگرهای بومی کشور ایران است. به منظور بررسی روشهای پرورش نیمه انبوه کنهی شکارگر، از رژیمهای غذایی مختلف شامل مراحل مختلف زیستی سه گونه کنه انباری Tyrophagus putrescentiae ،Tyrolichus casei و Rhizoglyphus robini از خانواده Acaridae و گردههای گیاهی مختلف (گردهی ذرت و خرما) در ظروف پرورش روی اسفنج مرطوب استفاده شد. کنههای انباری با سبوس گندم به همراه مخمر و دانه گرده ذرت تغذیه شدند. تعداد کنههای شکارگر یک، دو، سه و چهار هفته بعد شمارش شد. استفاده از ظروف بزرگتر برای پرورش مناسبتر بود. در بین سه گونه شکار مورد استفاده، کنه انباری T. putrescentiae مواد غذایی بهتری برای کنه شکارگر فراهم کرد، به طوری در شمارش چهارم تعداد کنهها به 12/17 عدد رسید. گرده ذرت به دلیل وجود ترکیبات مغذیتر و سادگی تهیه آن، برای کنهی شکارگر بهترین گزینه است، افزایش میزان گرده و یا سبوس حاوی کنه انباری روی افزایش تعداد کنههای شکارگر تاثیری نداشت. در پرورش این شکارگر، کنه انباری T. putrescentiae به همراه سبوس گندم، مخمر و گرده ذرت توصیه میشود.
The predatory mite (Acari: Phytoseiidae) Neoseiulus barkeri is one of the native predators of. In order to investigate the semi-mass breeding methods of the predatory mite, different diets including different biological stages of three storage mite species Tyrophagus putrescentiae, Tyrolichus casei and (Acari: Acaridae) Rhizoglyphus robini and different plant pollens (corn and date pollen) were used in rearing containers on wet sponge. Storage mites fed with wheat bran, yeast and corn pollen. The number of predatory mites counted one, two, three and four weeks later. It was more suitable to use larger containers for predatory rearing. Among the three prey species used, the storage mite T. putrescentiae provided better food for the predatory mite, so in the fourth count, the number of mites reached 17.12. Corn pollen is the best option for predatory mites due to the presence of compounds that are more nutritious and the simplicity of its preparation. Increasing the amount of pollen or bran containing storage mites did not affect the increase in the number of predatory mites. T. putrescentia storage mite along with wheat bran, yeast and corn pollen are recommended in breeding this predator.
1. Azzazy M.M. 2021. Biological performance of the predatory mite Neoseiulus barkeri: a candiadate for controlling of three mite species infesting grape trees. Vitis, 60:11-20.
2. Barbosa M.F.C., de Moraes G.J. 2015. Evaluation of astigmatid mite as factitious food for rearing four predaceous phytoseiid mites (Acari: Astigmatina: Phytoseiidae). Biological Control, 91:22-26.
3. Ballal C.R., Gupta S.K., Gupta T., Varshney, R. 2021. A simple protocol for rearing a native predatory mite Neoseiulus indicus. Current Science, 120(12):1923-1926.
4. Bond J. 1989. Biological studies including population growth parameters of the predatory mite Amblyseius barkeri (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) at 25°c in the laboratory. Entomophaga, 34:275-287.
5. Castagnoli M., Nannelli R., Tarchi F., Simoni S. 2006. Screening of astigmatid mites for mass-rearing Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Redia, 89:55-58.
6. Daneshvar H. 1986. A few predatory ticks from Iran with the description of one genus and six new species. Applied Entomology and Phytopathology, 54:55-73. [In Persian].
7. Fan Y., Petitt F.L. 1994. Biological control of broad mite, Polyphagotarsonemus latus (Banks), by Neoseiulus barkeri hughes on pepper. Biological Control, 4:390-395.
8. Faraji F., Hajizadeh J., Ueckermann E., Kamali K., McMurtry J. 2007. The new record for Iranian Phytoseiid mites with synonymy and keys to the species of Typhloseiulus Chant and McMurtry and Phytoseiidae in Iran (Acari: Mesostigmata). International Journal of Acarology, 33(3): 231-239.
9. Elhalawang A.S., Abo-shnaf R.I., Sand A.S. 2021. Release of predatory mite Neoseiulus barkeri (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) on olive seedlings in Egypt. International Journal of Acarology, 47(1):33-40.
10. Jafari S., Abassi N., Bahirae F. 2013. Demographic parameters of Neoseiulus barkeri (Acari: Phytoseiidae) fed on Thrips tabaci (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Persian Journal of Acarology, 2:287-296.
11. Glockemann B. 1992. Biological control of Frankliniella occidentalis on ornamental plants using predatory mites. EPPO Bulletin, 22:397-404.
12. Goleva I., Zebitz C.P. 2013. Suitability of different pollen as alternative food for the predatory mite Amblyseius swirskii (Acari, Phytoseiidae). Experimental and Applied Acarology, 61(3):259-283.
13. Hosseinina A., Mojib Z.H.G., Azimi M. H., Khanjani M. 2021. Study of demographic parameters of the predatory mite Amblyseius swirskii Athias -Henriot (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on dried fruit mite Carpoglyphus lactis Linnaeus (Acari: Astigmata) for mass rearing. Flower and Ornamental Plants, 6(1):13-28.
14. Hosseinina A., Biaat H. 2021. Investigation of fungal infection control compounds in Amblyseius swirskii Athias-Henriot (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on the dried fruit mite Carpoglyphus lactis Linnaeus (Acari: Astigmata) for mass rearin. Technical report of Flower and Ornamental Plant Research Institute, 18pp.
15. Li Y.Y., Liu M.X., Zhou H.W., Tian C.B., Zhang G.H., Liu X.Q., Liu H., Wang J.J. 2017. Evaluation of Neoseiulus barkeri (Acari: Phytoseiidae) for control of Eotetranychus kankitus (Acari: Tetranychidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 110(3):903-914.
16. Li Y.Y., Zhang G.H., Tian C.B., Liu M.X., Liu Y.Q., Liu H., Wang J.J. 2017. Does Long-Term Feeding on Alternative Prey Affect the Biological Performance of Neoseiulus barkeri (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on the Target Spider Mites? Journal of Economic Entomology, 110(3):915-923.
17. Khanamani M., Fathipour Y., Talebi A., Mehrabadi M. 2017. Evaluation of different artificial diet for rearing the predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus diet –dependent life table studies. Acarologia, 57(2):407-419.
18. Overmeer W.P.J. 1985. Rearing and handing. In: Helle ED, Sablis MW. Spider Mites, Their Biology, Natural Enemis and Control. vol. 1B. Elsevier. Amsterdam, pp: 161-170.
19. Messelink G.J., Van Holstein S.R. 2006. Potential for biological control of the bulb scale mite (Acari: Tarsonemidae) by predatory mites in amaryllis, Proceedings of the Netherlands Entomological Society Meeting, 17:113-118.
20. McMurtry J.A., Scriven G.T. 1975. Population increases of Phytseiulus persimilis on different insctary feeding programs. Journal of Economic Entomology, 68:319-321.
21. Momen F., Abdelkader M. 2010. Fungi as food source for the generalist predator Neoseiulus barkeri (Hughes) (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica, 45(2):401-409.
22. Moraes G.J. McMurtry J.A., Denmark H.A. Campos C.B. 2004. A revised catalog of family Phytoseiidae. Zootaxa, 1(434):1-494.
23. Negm M.W., Alatawi F.J., Aldryhim, Y.N. 2014. Biology, predation and life table of Cydnoseius negevi and Neoseiulus barkeri (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on the old world date mite Oligonychus afrasiaticus (Acari: Tetranychidae). Journal of Insect Science, 14(1):177.
24. Nomikou M., Janssen A., Sabelis M.W. 2003. Phytoseiid predators of whiteflies feed and reproduce on non- prey food source. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 31:15-26.
25. Tanigoshi L.K. 1982. Advances in knowledge of the biology of the Phytoseiidae.1-22. In: Gerson, U., Smiley, R.L., Ochoa, R. Mites (acari) for pest control. Blackwell Science Ltd. 539 pp.
26. Pascua M.S., Rocca M., Gerco N.M., De Clercq P. 2020. Typha angustifolia L. pollen as an alternative food for the predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Systematic and Applied Acarology, 25(1): 51-62.
27. Rahmani H., Kamali K., Faraji F. 2010. Predatory mite fauna of Phytoseiidae of northwest Iran (Acari: Mesostigmata). Turkish Journal of Zoology, 34:497-508.
28. Rezaie M. 2008. Faunistic survey of the Mesostigmatic mites (Acari) in Kermanshah province. 15th National and 3rd International of Biology, University of Tehran. pp:134.
29. Rezaie M. 2019. Suitability of different plant pollens as supplementary food source and natural prey for predatory mite, Neoseiulus barkeri Hughes (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Plant Protection, 41(4):77-90.
30. Rezaie M., Askarieh S. 2016. ¬Effect of different pollen grains on life table parameters of Neoseiulus barkeri (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Persian Journal of Acarology, 5(3):239-253.
31. Rezaie M., JavanNezhad R. 2019. The effect of different factors on mass rearing of predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus. Journal of Applied Researches in Plant Protection. 7(1):85-97. [In Persian].
32. San P.P., Tuda M., Nakahira K. 2020. Optimal rearing medium for the population growth of the predatory mite, Amblyseius swirskii (Athias-Henriot) (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Egypt Journal of Bioiogical Pest Control, 30:130.
33. SPSS Inc. 2012. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Crop, 2012.
34. Shirdel D., Kamali K., Ostevan H., Arbabi M. 2002. Comparison of two predatory mite rearing methods Eseius finlandicus, Typhlodromus kettanehi (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Applied Entomology and Phytopathology, 70(2):101-119. [In Persian].
35. Schliesske J. 1981. Ueber die technik der massenanzucht von raubmilben (Acari: Phytoseiidae) unter kontrollierten bedingungen. Mededelingen Van De Faculteit Landbouwwetenschappen Rijksuniversiteit, 46(2):511-517.
36. Van Rijn P.C., Tanigoshi L.K. 1999. Pollen as Food for the Predatory Mites Iphiseius Degenerans and Neoseiulus Cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Dietary Range and Life History. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 23:785-802.
37. Wu S., Gao Y., Xu X., Wang E. 2014. Evaluation of Stratioloelaos scimitus and Neoseiulus barkeri for biological control of thrips on greenhouse cucumber. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 24(10):1110-1121.
38. Xia B., Zou Z., Li P., Lin P. 2012. Effect of temperature on development and reproduction of Neoseiulus barkeri (Acari: Phytoseiidae) fed on Aleuroglyphus ovatus. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 56: 33-41.
39. Yazdanpanah S., Fathipour Y., Riahi E., Zalucki P. 2022. Cost-efective and efcient factitious prey for mass production of Neoseiulus cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae): assessing its quality compared with natural prey. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control, 32 (16):1-12.
40. Yazdanpanah S., Fathipour Y., Riahi E., Zalucki P. 2022. Pollen alone or a mixture of pollen types? Assessing their suitability for mass rearing of Neoseiulus cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae) over 20 generations. Journal of Insect Science, 22(4):1-7.
41. Yue B., Tsai J.H. 1996. Development, survivorship and reproduction of Amblyseius largoensis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on selected plant pollens and temperatures. Environmental Entomology, 125:488-494.
42. Zhang B.X., Li D.S., Feng L., Huang S.H. 2007. Research progress of mass production and release technologies of predatory mites. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 23:279-283